Literature DB >> 12878951

Doppler microembolic load predicts risk of thromboembolic complications in Novacor patients.

Darius G Nabavi1, Joerg Stockmann, Christof Schmid, Michael Schneider, Dieter Hammel, Hans H Scheld, E Bernd Ringelstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Left ventricular assist devices have become an established method to bridge patients with end-stage cardiac failure to heart transplantation. Besides infection and bleeding, thromboembolism represents one of the most serious complications. We evaluated the value of microembolic signals in predicting thromboembolic events for individual patients and distinctive left ventricular assist device periods.
METHODS: Twenty patients (14 male) aged 23-57 years supported with the Novacor N100 left ventricular assist device were enrolled in this study. All patients were on effective anticoagulation, 12 patients additionally received antiplatelet therapy. Unilateral detection of microembolic signals was performed once weekly by insonation of the middle cerebral artery using transcranial Doppler sonography for 30 minutes duration. Evidence of clinically manifest thromboembolic events was based on regular questionnaires, clinical examinations, and results of diagnostic procedures.
RESULTS: During a cumulative follow-up of 3876 left ventricular assist device days, 44 thromboembolic complications occurred (incidence, 1.1%) in 15 out of 20 patients. A total of 360 transcranial Doppler sonography monitorings (range, 5-34 per patient) were performed with an overall microembolic signals prevalence of 35.3% and a microembolic signal mean of 2.3 +/- 9.2 per examination. There was a highly significant correlation between the individual microembolic signal activity and the respective incidence of clinical thromboembolism (r = 0.61-0.9; P <.01). Patients with additional antiplatelet treatment had significantly less thromboembolic complications (0.7%) and lower microembolic signal prevalence (18.3%) than those without (2.8% and 65.4%, respectively). Individual patients and left ventricular assist device months with clinical thromboembolization could be identified using the microembolic signal activity with moderate positive (0.37-0.7) and high negative predictive values (0.82-1.0).
CONCLUSIONS: The amount of microembolic signals, serially detected in patients with the Novacor left ventricular assist device, is significantly associated with their incidence of embolic complications. The high negative predictive value of microembolic signals enables to identify those patients and left ventricular assist device periods with particularly low risk of clinical thromboembolization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12878951     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(03)00019-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of micro-emboli in a patient with ventricular assist device support with hemolysis.

Authors:  Osamu Seguchi; Kozue Saito; Kazuki Fukuma; Keiko Shimamoto; Takuma Sato; Seiko Nakajima; Haruki Sunami; Kensuke Kuroda; Takamasa Sato; Takuya Watanabe; Hiroki Hata; Masanobu Yanase; Tomoyuki Fujita; Junjiro Kobayashi; Kazuyuki Nagatsuka; Takeshi Nakatani
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 2.  The biological basis of thrombosis and bleeding in patients with ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Ranjit John; Sangjin Lee
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Microembolic signals and strategy to prevent gas embolism during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Paolo Zanatta; Alessandro Forti; Enrico Bosco; Loris Salvador; Maurizio Borsato; Fabrizio Baldanzi; Carolina Longo; Carlo Sorbara; Pierluigi Longatti; Carlo Valfrè
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 1.637

4.  Frequency analysis of high-intensity transient signals of transcranial Doppler ultrasound in patients supported with a left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Koichi Sato; Kazuhiko Hanzawa; Takeshi Okamoto; Shunei Kyo; Jun-ichi Hayashi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 5.  Physiologic effects of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Aaron H Healy; Stephen H McKellar; Stavros G Drakos; Antigoni Koliopoulou; Josef Stehlik; Craig H Selzman
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Stroke Incidence and Impact of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Cerebrovascular Physiology.

Authors:  William K Cornwell; Amrut V Ambardekar; Tomio Tran; Jay D Pal; Luis Cava; Justin Lawley; Takashi Tarumi; Christy L Cornwell; Keith Aaronson
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 7.914

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.