Literature DB >> 12878250

Limits of uncertainty in measured values of embolus-to-blood ratio due to Doppler sample volume shape and location.

Emma L Angell1, David H Evans.   

Abstract

Measurements of the relative Doppler power scattered by an embolus and the surrounding blood are widely used to infer the composition of the embolus. For a given embolus, measured embolus-to-blood ratio (MEBR) is affected by the Doppler sample volume shape, the geometrical relationship between the sample volume and the vessel, and the embolus trajectory through the blood vessel. The likely magnitudes of such effects were quantified using a model that allowed calculation of theoretical values of MEBR as a function of the geometrical relationship between a blood vessel and a defined sample volume. Overall, the effects of embolus trajectory, likely insonation angles, and plausible vessel misalignments introduced uncertainties in MEBR values of approximately 10 to 12 dB for a given vessel size. In practice, the only operator-controlled factors are the position and orientation of the transcranial Doppler probe on the patients' heads. Probe positioning can significantly affect MEBR and suboptimal positioning may result in the reduced detection of emboli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12878250     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(03)00067-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  4 in total

1.  Real-time identification and archiving of micro-embolic Doppler signals using a knowledge-based DSP system.

Authors:  L Fan; D H Evans; A R Naylor; P Tortoli
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Sizing gaseous emboli using Doppler embolic signal intensity.

Authors:  Caroline Banahan; James P Hague; David H Evans; Rizwan Patel; Kumar V Ramnarine; Emma M L Chung
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Thrombus size and Doppler embolic signal intensity.

Authors:  Matthew J Martin; Emma M L Chung; Kumar V Ramnarine; Alison H Goodall; A Ross Naylor; David H Evans
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 2.762

4.  An in vitro comparison of embolus differentiation techniques for clinically significant macroemboli: dual-frequency technique versus frequency modulation method.

Authors:  Caroline Banahan; Zach Rogerson; Clément Rousseau; Kumar V Ramnarine; David H Evans; Emma M L Chung
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 2.998

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.