Literature DB >> 12877695

Venous occlusion of the access vein in patients referred for lead extraction: influence of patient and lead characteristics.

Frank Bracke1, Albert Meijer, Berry Van Gelder.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of patient and lead characteristics on occlusion of the access vein in pacemaker and ICD patients. Contrast venography of the access vein was obtained in 89 patients (17 patients with an ICD) scheduled for lead extraction. The indication for extraction was infection in 57 patients (systemic infection in 9) and lead malfunction in 32 patients. In 6 of the 89 patients, leads were introduced in both the right and left subpectoral area, resulting in a total of 95 venous entry sites. In 22 of these entry sites one lead was present, in 61 two leads, in 11 three, and in 1 four leads. The vessel patency was graded open or occluded. Occlusion of the subclavian vein occurred in four (13%) patients with lead malfunction versus 18 (32%) patients with infection (P = 0.07). In patients with systemic infection, 5 of 9 showed venous occlusion (P = 0.01 when compared to patients with malfunction, odds ratio 8.75, 95% confidence interval 1.21-64.11). Considered per entry site, the incidence of occlusion was 7 of 22 with one lead present, 17 of 61 with two leads, 0 of 11 with three leads, and 0 of 1 with four leads (P = 0.13). No patient had a superior vena caval occlusion. Patients with systemic infection have an increased risk of occlusion of the access vein. On the contrary, the study found no support for the concept that the risk of venous occlusion increases with a higher number of leads present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12877695     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.t01-1-00247.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  16 in total

1.  Symptomatic occlusion of the access vein after pacemaker or ICD lead extraction.

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; L M Van Gelder
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  [Strategies for the avoidance and treatment of complications during pacemaker implantation].

Authors:  C Kolb
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2007-12

Review 3.  Venous thrombosis and stenosis after implantation of pacemakers and defibrillators.

Authors:  Grzegorz Rozmus; James P Daubert; David T Huang; Spencer Rosero; Burr Hall; Charles Francis
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Reflections of six years of lead extraction: influence on indications and technique.

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; B van Gelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.380

5.  Treatment of pacemaker-induced superior vena cava syndrome by balloon angioplasty and stenting.

Authors:  B Klop; M G Scheffer; E McFadden; F Bracke; B van Gelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Percutaneous treatment of the superior vena cava syndrome via an excimer laser sheath in a patient with a single chamber atrial pacemaker.

Authors:  Ann C Garlitski; Jad D Swingle; Anthony Aizer; Douglas S Holmes; Neil E Bernstein; Larry A Chinitz
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Implanted endocardial lead characteristics and risk of stroke or transient ischemic attack.

Authors:  Vaibhav R Vaidya; Christopher V DeSimone; Samuel J Asirvatham; Vishnu M Chandra; Amit Noheria; David O Hodge; Joshua P Slusser; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Paul A Friedman
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Pulmonary embolism in patients with transvenous cardiac implantable electronic device leads.

Authors:  Amit Noheria; Shiva P Ponamgi; Christopher V Desimone; Vaibhav R Vaidya; Christopher A Aakre; Elisa Ebrille; Tiffany Hu; David O Hodge; Joshua P Slusser; Naser M Ammash; Charles J Bruce; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Paul A Friedman; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 5.214

9.  Successful coronary sinus lead replacement despite total venous occlusion using femoral pull through, two operator counter-traction and subclavian venoplasty.

Authors:  Dominic P S Rogers; Pier D Lambiase; Anthony W C Chow
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Percutaneous transvenous angioplasty of left innominate vein stenosis following right side permanent pacemaker implantation- a left femoral vein to left axillary vein approach.

Authors:  Gautam Sharma; Nagendra Boopathy Senguttuvan; Sandeep Singh; Rajnish Juneja; Vinay K Bahl
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2012-12-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.