OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our prospective study was to assess the image quality with respect to the radiation dose incurred by multidetector CT (MDCT) in patients with suspected bronchiectasis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Image clusters, composed of nine images, using MDCT (120 kVp, a 2.5-mm collimation, a pitch of 6, and 2.5-mm reconstruction intervals) were obtained at each of two levels-the azygous arch and the right inferior pulmonary vein-at 170, 100, 70, 40, 20, and 10 mA. Independently, two chest radiologists assessed and compared the quality of the images obtained at the six milliamperage exposures. Image quality was graded using a 5-point scale with lung and mediastinal window settings. Radiation doses were measured at each of the six milliamperage settings while scanning the whole lung of a thoracic phantom using MDCT. RESULTS: The mean image quality scores at exposures of 170, 100, 70, 40, 20, 10 mA were as follows: 3.9, 3.7, 3.8, 3.2, 2.5, 1.6 at lung window settings and 4.1, 4.3, 4.0, 3.4, 2.3, 1.3 at mediastinal window settings, respectively. Images obtained at 70 mA were rated significantly better than those obtained at 40 mA or less (p < 0.01). The mean radiation dose at 170, 100, 70, 40, 20, 10 mA was 23.72, 14.39, 10.54, 5.41, 2.74, and 1.50 mGy, respectively. CONCLUSION: With a tube current setting as low as 70 mA, MDCT provides images of acceptable quality and volumetric data sets for the evaluation of bronchiectasis. The trade-off of using MDCT rather than conventional high-resolution CT is that the radiation dose is five times higher with MDCT (10.54 mGy) than with conventional high-resolution CT (2.17 mGy with parameters of 120 kVp, 170 mA, 1-mm collimation, and 10-mm intervals).
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our prospective study was to assess the image quality with respect to the radiation dose incurred by multidetector CT (MDCT) in patients with suspected bronchiectasis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Image clusters, composed of nine images, using MDCT (120 kVp, a 2.5-mm collimation, a pitch of 6, and 2.5-mm reconstruction intervals) were obtained at each of two levels-the azygous arch and the right inferior pulmonary vein-at 170, 100, 70, 40, 20, and 10 mA. Independently, two chest radiologists assessed and compared the quality of the images obtained at the six milliamperage exposures. Image quality was graded using a 5-point scale with lung and mediastinal window settings. Radiation doses were measured at each of the six milliamperage settings while scanning the whole lung of a thoracic phantom using MDCT. RESULTS: The mean image quality scores at exposures of 170, 100, 70, 40, 20, 10 mA were as follows: 3.9, 3.7, 3.8, 3.2, 2.5, 1.6 at lung window settings and 4.1, 4.3, 4.0, 3.4, 2.3, 1.3 at mediastinal window settings, respectively. Images obtained at 70 mA were rated significantly better than those obtained at 40 mA or less (p < 0.01). The mean radiation dose at 170, 100, 70, 40, 20, 10 mA was 23.72, 14.39, 10.54, 5.41, 2.74, and 1.50 mGy, respectively. CONCLUSION: With a tube current setting as low as 70 mA, MDCT provides images of acceptable quality and volumetric data sets for the evaluation of bronchiectasis. The trade-off of using MDCT rather than conventional high-resolution CT is that the radiation dose is five times higher with MDCT (10.54 mGy) than with conventional high-resolution CT (2.17 mGy with parameters of 120 kVp, 170 mA, 1-mm collimation, and 10-mm intervals).
Authors: Andreas Christe; Zsolt Szucs-Farkas; Adrian Huber; Philipp Steiger; Lars Leidolt; Justus E Roos; Johannes Heverhagen; Lukas Ebner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-26 Impact factor: 3.240