Literature DB >> 1287574

Cooperative tapping: time control under different feedback conditions.

J Mates1, T Radil, E Pöppel.   

Abstract

The same isochronous tone sequence was presented simultaneously to two mutually isolated subjects. In half the trials, accentuation in this sequence was accomplished by doubling the duration of the first and then of every fourth tone; in the other half, by doubling the frequency of those tones. The subjects' task was to follow the rhythm of the resulting four-tone patterns by finger tapping to tone onsets. There were four auditory feedback (FB) conditions: (1) no FB; (2) FB from the subject's own motor responses; (3) "alien" FB from the motor responses of the other pair member who, in turn, was listening to FB from his/her own tapping; (4) mutually "crossed" FB, where each pair member listened to FB from the tapping of the other. Tap onsets regularly preceded stimulus onsets. The observed order of the amount of this anticipation (from least to greatest) was: (1) own FB, (2) no FB, (3) alien FB, and (4) crossed FB. No mutual dynamic influence between simultaneously performing subjects was detected. Anticipation was more pronounced for sequences that were accentuated by frequency rather than by duration changes. The type of accent also influenced timing of intertap intervals in the rhythmic patterns. For the frequency accent, regular timing was produced, whereas for the durational accent, shortening of the second and lengthening of the fourth (the last) intertap interval were observed. The presence and source of feedback as well as the character of accentuation are therefore relevant factors in the timing of auditorally controlled rhythmic motor behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1287574     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  21 in total

1.  The effects of different social feedback conditions upon performance in dyadic teams.

Authors:  S ROSENBERG; R L HALL
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1958-11

2.  Timing of rhythmic tapping and lateralization.

Authors:  J Ilmberger; U Müller; E Pöppel; J Mates; T Radil
Journal:  Act Nerv Super (Praha)       Date:  1990-06

3.  Stimulus anticipation and the 30 ms basic timing unit during rhythmic tapping.

Authors:  U Müller; J Ilmberger; E Pöppel; J Mates; T Radil
Journal:  Act Nerv Super (Praha)       Date:  1990-06

4.  Following of rhythmic tonal sequences by tapping and holding the response key.

Authors:  M Franĕk; T Radil; E Pöppel; K Beck; J Mates; J Ilmberger
Journal:  Act Nerv Super (Praha)       Date:  1989-06

5.  Sensory integration within temporally neutral systems states: a hypothesis.

Authors:  E Pöppel; K Schill; N von Steinbüchel
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1990-02

6.  Excitability cycles in central intermittency.

Authors:  E Pöppel
Journal:  Psychol Forsch       Date:  1970

7.  Proprioception as a mediator in the timing of motor responses.

Authors:  R A Schmidt; R W Christina
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-08

8.  Social feedback: determination of social learning.

Authors:  K U Smith; H Kao
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 2.254

Review 9.  Perception and estimation of time.

Authors:  P Fraisse
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 24.137

10.  Temporal tracking and synchronization strategies.

Authors:  D Hary; G P Moore
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1985
View more
  15 in total

1.  Transfer of learned perception of sensorimotor simultaneity.

Authors:  Michael J Pesavento; John Schlag
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Tapping ahead of time: its association with timing variability.

Authors:  Junkai Yang; Feiyi Ouyang; Linus Holm; Yingyu Huang; Lingyu Gan; Liang Zhou; Huizhen Chao; Mengye Wang; Mengxue He; Sheng Zhang; Bo Yang; Junhao Pan; Xiang Wu
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-06-28

3.  Trained to keep a beat: movement-related enhancements to timing perception in percussionists and non-percussionists.

Authors:  Fiona C Manning; Michael Schutz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-06-12

4.  Temporal prediction abilities are mediated by motor effector and rhythmic expertise.

Authors:  Fiona C Manning; Jennifer Harris; Michael Schutz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of recent research (2006-2012).

Authors:  Bruno H Repp; Yi-Huang Su
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

6.  Increasing stimulus intensity does not affect sensorimotor synchronization.

Authors:  Anita Białuńska; Simone Dalla Bella; Piotr Jaśkowski
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-04-03

7.  Auditory-motor integration of subliminal phase shifts in tapping: better than auditory discrimination would predict.

Authors:  Florian A Kagerer; Priya Viswanathan; Jose L Contreras-Vidal; Jill Whitall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Synchronizing actions with events: the role of sensory information.

Authors:  G Aschersleben; W Prinz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-04

9.  A model of synchronization of motor acts to a stimulus sequence. I. Timing and error corrections.

Authors:  J Mates
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Motor timing deficits in community and clinical boys with hyperactive behavior: the effect of methylphenidate on motor timing.

Authors:  Katya Rubia; Janet Noorloos; Anna Smith; Boudewijn Gunning; Joseph Sergeant
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2003-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.