Literature DB >> 12872879

Process dissociation using a guided procedure.

Leonard D Stern1, Angela K McNaught-Davis, Timothy R Barker.   

Abstract

A method for achieving process dissociation is described that places less emphasis on participants' understanding and remembering interpretations of test cues than does the standard procedure. The proposed method, called the guided procedure, tests memory with a sequence of two prompts, one requesting word-stem recognition, followed by another for word-stem completion. Inclusion and exclusion conditions are produced by requesting completion of recognized stems to form previously presented or new words, respectively. Estimates of automatic and conscious memory produced by the standard and the guided procedures are compared in studies modeled after Toth, Reingold, and Jacoby (1994). Although not significantly different in many aspects, the outcomes differ in ways that may reflect less reliance on a generate-recognize strategy of participants tested with the guided procedure. Additional measures of memory available only with the guided procedure are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12872879     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  11 in total

1.  Evidence for a generate-recognize model of episodic influences on word-stem completion.

Authors:  G E Bodner; M E Masson; J I Caldwell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Level of processing and the process-dissociation procedure: elusiveness of null effects on estimates of automatic retrieval.

Authors:  Alan Richardson-Klavehn; John M Gardiner; Cristina Ramponi
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2002 Sep-Nov

3.  Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model.

Authors:  A P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Facilitation and interference in indirect/implicit memory tests and in the process dissociation paradigm: the letter insertion and the letter deletion tasks.

Authors:  E M Reingold
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1995-12

5.  Invariance in automatic influences of memory: toward a user's guide for the process-dissociation procedure.

Authors:  L L Jacoby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation.

Authors:  T Curran; D L Hintzman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Recollective experience in the revelation effect: separating the contributions of recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  D C LeCompte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-05

8.  Toward a redefinition of implicit memory: process dissociations following elaborative processing and self-generation.

Authors:  J P Toth; E M Reingold; L L Jacoby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Depressive deficits in recognition: dissociation of recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  P T Hertel; S Milan
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1994-11

10.  Involuntary conscious memory and the method of opposition.

Authors:  A Richardson-Klavehn; J M Gardiner; R I Java
Journal:  Memory       Date:  1994-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.