Literature DB >> 12871764

Human V5 demonstrated by magnetoencephalography using random dot kinematograms of different coherence levels.

Hajime Nakamura1, Satoshi Kashii, Takashi Nagamine, Yoshie Matsui, Tadashi Hashimoto, Yoshihito Honda, Hiroshi Shibasaki.   

Abstract

To investigate the cortical mechanisms for motion perception in human V5, we measured visual evoked magnetic fields in response to random dot kinematograms (RDKs) of three different coherence levels (50, 70 and 100%) using a 122-channel whole-head magnetometer. As the coherence level increased, the peak amplitude measured by the root mean square (RMS) of the local response increased significantly (7.4+/-1.0, 9.5+/-1.5 and 15.5+/-3.2 fT/cm on the right, 6.4+/-0.3, 7.8+/-0.7 and 12.5+/-0.9 fT/cm on the left; for the coherence level of 50, 70 and 100%, respectively). There was no significant difference between the hemispheres. As for the peak latency, there was no significant difference in terms of coherence levels or hemispheres. The response was localized posterior to the junction of the ascending limb of the inferior temporal and lateral occipital sulci (human V5). These findings indicate that processing of global motion in terms of the synchronized portion correlates well with the response amplitude but not with its latency. Thus, we could estimate the magnetic responses of human V5 non-invasively by presenting different coherence levels of the visual motion stimuli. Hemispheric laterality was recognized, although the dominant side varied among subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12871764     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-0102(03)00119-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Res        ISSN: 0168-0102            Impact factor:   3.304


  23 in total

Review 1.  A primer on motion visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Abnormalities of coherent motion processing in strabismic amblyopia: Visual-evoked potential measurements.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Mark W Pettet; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Neural processes for intentional control of perceptual switching: a magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Masanori Shimono; Keiichi Kitajo; Tsunehiro Takeda
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review.

Authors:  Anthony M Norcia; L Gregory Appelbaum; Justin M Ales; Benoit R Cottereau; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Individual differences in children's global motion sensitivity correlate with TBSS-based measures of the superior longitudinal fasciculus.

Authors:  Oliver Braddick; Janette Atkinson; Natacha Akshoomoff; Erik Newman; Lauren B Curley; Marybel Robledo Gonzalez; Timothy Brown; Anders Dale; Terry Jernigan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Magnetoencephalography demonstrates multiple asynchronous generators during human sleep spindles.

Authors:  Nima Dehghani; Sydney S Cash; Andrea O Rossetti; Chih Chuan Chen; Eric Halgren
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Global motion perception in 2-year-old children: a method for psychophysical assessment and relationships with clinical measures of visual function.

Authors:  Tzu-Ying Yu; Robert J Jacobs; Nicola S Anstice; Nabin Paudel; Jane E Harding; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Motion in the mind's eye: comparing mental and visual rotation.

Authors:  Amy L Shelton; Holly A Pippitt
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Deficits of visual motion perception and optokinetic nystagmus after posterior suprasylvian lesions in the ferret (Mustela putorius furo).

Authors:  D Hupfeld; C Distler; K-P Hoffmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Invisibility of moving objects: a core symptom of motion blindness.

Authors:  Nobuko Otsuka-Hirota; Haruko Yamamoto; Kotaro Miyashita; Kazuyuki Nagatsuka
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-04-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.