Literature DB >> 12871062

Conformational flexibility models for the receptor in structure based drug design.

M L Teodoro1, L E Kavraki.   

Abstract

The problem of incorporating receptor flexibility in routine in silico screening of databases of small chemical compounds for the purposes of structure based drug design is still an unsolved problem. The main reason behind this difficulty is the large number of degrees of freedom that have to be considered to represent receptor flexibility. In this paper we review protein flexibility models that have been developed to limit the number of additional search parameters. These models can be roughly divided into five different categories. These are a) use of soft receptors which relax energetic penalties due to steric clashes, b) selection of a few critical degrees of freedom in the receptor binding site, c) use of multiple receptor structures either individually or by combining them using an averaging scheme, d) use of modified molecular simulation methods, and e) use of collective degrees of freedom as a new basis of representation for protein flexibility. All these flexible receptor models strive to balance an improvement in the accuracy of the binding predictions with an increase in computational cost. In addition, other challenges such as the development of accurate solvation models and scoring functions make the receptor flexibility problem even harder.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12871062     DOI: 10.2174/1381612033454595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Pharm Des        ISSN: 1381-6128            Impact factor:   3.116


  39 in total

1.  Utilizing experimental data for reducing ensemble size in flexible-protein docking.

Authors:  Mengang Xu; Markus A Lill
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Discovery of novel checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitors by virtual screening based on multiple crystal structures.

Authors:  Yan Li; Dong Joon Kim; Weiya Ma; Ronald A Lubet; Ann M Bode; Zigang Dong
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Efficient molecular docking of NMR structures: application to HIV-1 protease.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 4.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative.

Authors:  Maxim Totrov; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 5.  Evaluation of the performance of 3D virtual screening protocols: RMSD comparisons, enrichment assessments, and decoy selection--what can we learn from earlier mistakes?

Authors:  Johannes Kirchmair; Patrick Markt; Simona Distinto; Gerhard Wolber; Thierry Langer
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  IRECS: a new algorithm for the selection of most probable ensembles of side-chain conformations in protein models.

Authors:  Christoph Hartmann; Iris Antes; Thomas Lengauer
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Modeling the inhibition of quadruple mutant Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase by pyrimethamine derivatives.

Authors:  Gary B Fogel; Mars Cheung; Eric Pittman; David Hecht
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 8.  Receptor-ligand molecular docking.

Authors:  Isabella A Guedes; Camila S de Magalhães; Laurent E Dardenne
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2013-12-21

Review 9.  Efficient incorporation of protein flexibility and dynamics into molecular docking simulations.

Authors:  Markus A Lill
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Molecular recognition in the case of flexible targets.

Authors:  Anthony Ivetac; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.