Literature DB >> 12870783

Cost-effectiveness of photodynamic therapy for treatment of Barrett's esophagus with high grade dysplasia.

Chin Hur1, Norman S Nishioka, G Scott Gazelle.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) versus surgical esophagectomy and intensive endoscopic surveillance for patients with Barrett's esophagus and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) who are operative candidates. The results of our Markov Monte Carlo model show that PDT increased life expectancy by 1.8 years and quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) by 1.65 years when compared to the surveillance strategy. Relative to the esophagectomy strategy, PDT resulted in a greater life expectancy by 0.8 years and 2.17 additional quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Although PDT cost 20,400 dollars and 7,100 dollars more than surveillance and esophagectomy respectively, the resulting incremental cost-effective ratios (ICERs) of 12,400 dollars/QALY and 3,300 dollars/QALY are within commonly accepted values. These findings were sensitive to the value assigned to the quality of life after PDT, but only at unrealistic values. In conclusion, PDT increases life expectancy and is cost-effective when compared to endoscopic surveillance and surgical esophagectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12870783     DOI: 10.1023/a:1024146823549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  36 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Screening for high-grade dysplasia in gastroesophageal reflux disease: is it cost-effective?

Authors:  A Soni; R E Sampliner; A Sonnenberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota.

Authors:  G R Locke; N J Talley; S L Fett; A R Zinsmeister; L J Melton
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 4.  Current status of photodynamic therapy of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  K K Wang
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Authors:  M C Weinstein; J E Siegel; M R Gold; M S Kamlet; L B Russell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Cost-effectiveness of screening the average-risk population for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Dawn Provenzale
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2002-01

Review 7.  Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  S J Spechler; R K Goyal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-08-07       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Carcinoma of the esophagus: results of treatment.

Authors:  J G van Andel; J Dees; C M Dijkhuis; W Fokkens; H van Houten; P C de Jong; W M van Woerkom-Eykenboom
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia: an indication for esophagectomy?

Authors:  M Pera; V F Trastek; H A Carpenter; M S Allen; C Deschamps; P C Pairolero
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery.

Authors:  C B Begg; L D Cramer; W J Hoskins; M F Brennan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-25       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  17 in total

1.  Targeted screening of individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer: results of a simulation model.

Authors:  Pari V Pandharipande; Curtis Heberle; Emily C Dowling; Chung Yin Kong; Angela Tramontano; Katherine E Perzan; William Brugge; Chin Hur
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Two models better than one.

Authors:  C Hur; N S Nishioka; G S Gazelle
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Photodynamic therapy for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Dan Comay; Gord Blackhouse; Ron Goeree; David Armstrong; John K Marshall
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 4.  Barrett's oesophagus: the new endoscopic modalities have a future.

Authors:  J Deviere
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Patient preferences for the management of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Chin Hur; Eve Wittenberg; Norman S Nishioka; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Screening and Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus: Is It Cost-Effective?

Authors:  John M Inadomi; Nina Saxena
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Tumor cell survival pathways activated by photodynamic therapy: a molecular basis for pharmacological inhibition strategies.

Authors:  Mans Broekgaarden; Ruud Weijer; Thomas M van Gulik; Michael R Hamblin; Michal Heger
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 9.264

8.  A bioactivatable self-quenched nanogel for targeted photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Huacheng He; Anna-Liisa Nieminen; Peisheng Xu
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 6.843

Review 9.  A cost-utility analysis of ablative therapy for Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  John M Inadomi; Ma Somsouk; Ryan D Madanick; Jennifer P Thomas; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 10.  Treatment for Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  Jonathan Re Rees; Pierre Lao-Sirieix; Angela Wong; Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.