Literature DB >> 12868339

[Acquisition and assessment of patient exposure in diagnostic radiology and nuclear medicine].

Dieter Regulla1, Jürgen Griebel, Dietmar Nosske, Burkhard Bauer, Gunnar Brix.   

Abstract

The regular annual monitoring of patient exposure in radiation diagnostics, as performed by the Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), plays an important role in evaluating the awareness of radiological quality and safety in Germany and the risk-benefit optimization for patients. For the reporting year 1997, X-ray diagnostics resulted in a mean effective dose of 2 +/- 0.5 mSv per head of population. The underlying frequency of medical X-ray examinations was approximately 136 million, i.e., 1.7 examinations annually per head of population. In terms of nuclear medicine diagnostics, the patients exposure amounted to approximately 0.15 mSv effective dose per head of population. In this case, the number of examinations amounted to approximately 4 million, corresponding to a frequency of approximately 0.05 examinations annually per head of population. The paper discusses factors influencing the calculation of exposure, as well as the lack of an internationally accepted protocol to evaluate patient exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12868339     DOI: 10.1078/0939-3889-00153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Med Phys        ISSN: 0939-3889            Impact factor:   4.820


  6 in total

1.  Effective dose delivered by conventional radiology to Aosta Valley population between 2002 and 2009.

Authors:  F Zenone; S Aimonetto; P Catuzzo; A Peruzzo Cornetto; P Marchisio; M Natrella; A M Rosanò; T Meloni; M Pasquino; S Tofani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Sustainability of medical imaging.

Authors:  Eugenio Picano
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-06

3.  [Recommendations for the standardized evaluation and classification of painful temporomandibular disorders: an update].

Authors:  J C Türp; A Hugger; P Nilges; S Hugger; J Siegert; E Busche; S Effenberger; H J Schindler
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  Estimation of patient dose and associated radiogenic risks from limb lengthening.

Authors:  Frank M Schiedel; Tim C Buller; Robert Rödl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Economic and biological costs of cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Eugenio Picano
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2005-05-25       Impact factor: 2.062

Review 6.  The biological effects of diagnostic cardiac imaging on chronically exposed physicians: the importance of being non-ionizing.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Andreassi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 2.062

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.