Literature DB >> 12867217

Effects of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron and granisetron in healthy subjects.

Robert A Blum1, Anup Majumdar, Jacqueline McCrea, John Busillo, Laura H Orlowski, Deborah Panebianco, Michael Hesney, Kevin J Petty, Michael R Goldberg, M Gail Murphy, Kevin M Gottesdiener, Carolyn M Hustad, Christian Lates, Walter K Kraft, Sandi Van Buren, Scott A Waldman, Howard E Greenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The neurokinin-1-receptor antagonist aprepitant, when given in combination with a corticosteroid and a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT(3))-receptor antagonist, has been shown to be effective for the prevention of acute and delated chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).
OBJECTIVE: Two studies were conducted to determine whether concomitant administration of aprepitant altered the pharmacokinetic profiles of ondansetron and granisetron, two 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists commonly used as antiemetic therapy for CINV.
METHODS: The 2 studies were randomized, open-label, crossover trials conducted in healthy subjects aged between 18 and 46 years. Study 1 involved the following 2 treatment regimens: aprepitant 375 mg PO, dexamethasone 20 mg PO, and ondansetron 32 mg IV on day 1, followed by aprepitant 250 mg PO and dexamethasone 8 mg PO on days 2 through 5; and dexamethasone 20 mg PO and ondansetron 32 mg IV on day 1, followed by dexamethasone 8 mg PO on days 2 through 5. Study 2 involved the following 2 treatment regimens: aprepitant 125 mg PO with granisetron 2 mg PO on day 1, followed by aprepitant 80 mg PO on days 2 and 3; and granisetron 2 mg PO on day 1 only. Individual plasma samples were used to estimate area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0- infinity )), peak plasma concentration, and apparent terminal elimination half-life (t(12)) of both ondansetron and granisetron.
RESULTS: Study 1 included 19 subjects (10 women, 9 men), and study 2 included 18 subjects (11 men, 7 women). Coadministration of aprepitant 375 mg produced a small but statistically significant increase in the AUC(0- infinity ) for intravenous ondansetron (from 1268.3 to 1456.5 ng.h/mL; P = 0.019), with no significant effect on peak concentration at the end of the infusion (360.8 ng/mL with aprepitant vs 408.4 ng/mL without) or t(12) (5.0 vs 4.5 hours, respectively). Coadministration of aprepitant 125 mg/80 mg did not alter the mean pharmacokinetic characteristics of oral granisetron (AUC(0- infinity ), 101.4 ng.h/mL with aprepitant vs 92.2 ng.h/mL without; maximum plasma concentration, 9.0 ng/mL with and without aprepitant; time to maximum plasma concentration, both 3.0 hours; t(12), 6.5 vs 6.9 hours, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Concomitant administration of aprepitant had no clinically significant effect on the mean pharmacokinetic characteristics of either ondansetron or granisetron in these healthy subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12867217     DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80128-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  17 in total

1.  The NK₁ receptor antagonist aprepitant does not alter the pharmacokinetics of high-dose melphalan chemotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Gerlinde Egerer; Kathrin Eisenlohr; Martina Gronkowski; Juergen Burhenne; Klaus-Dieter Riedel; Gerd Mikus
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Aprepitant: a review of its use in the prevention of nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Monique P Curran; Dean M Robinson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Aprepitant and fosaprepitant drug interactions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Priya Patel; J Steven Leeder; Micheline Piquette-Miller; L Lee Dupuis
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  PharmGKB summary: Ondansetron and tropisetron pathways, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Rachel Huddart; Russ B Altman; Teri E Klein
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Effect of netupitant, a highly selective NK₁ receptor antagonist, on the pharmacokinetics of palonosetron and impact of the fixed dose combination of netupitant and palonosetron when coadministered with ketoconazole, rifampicin, and oral contraceptives.

Authors:  Selma Calcagnile; Corinna Lanzarotti; Giorgia Rossi; Anders Henriksson; Klaus Peter Kammerer; Wolfgang Timmer
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Consensus proposals for the prevention of acute and delayed vomiting and nausea following high-emetic-risk chemotherapy.

Authors:  Mark G Kris; Paul J Hesketh; Jorn Herrstedt; Cynthia Rittenberg; Lawrence H Einhorn; Steven Grunberg; Jim Koeller; Ian Olver; Sussanne Borjeson; Enzo Ballatori
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  Same old story? Do we need to modify our supportive care treatment of elderly cancer patients? Focus on antiemetics.

Authors:  Cesare Gridelli
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 8.  Factors influencing the choice of 5-HT3-receptor antagonist antiemetics: focus on elderly cancer patients.

Authors:  Cesare Gridelli; Matti Aapro
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-03-04       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Effectiveness of a single-day three-drug regimen of dexamethasone, palonosetron, and aprepitant for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting caused by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Steven M Grunberg; Matthew Dugan; Hyman Muss; Marie Wood; Susan Burdette-Radoux; Tracey Weisberg; Marisa Siebel
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  Aprepitant: a review of its use in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Toni M Dando; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.