Literature DB >> 12865280

Liver microbubble transit time compared with histology and Child-Pugh score in diffuse liver disease: a cross sectional study.

M J K Blomley1, A K P Lim, C J Harvey, N Patel, R J Eckersley, R Basilico, R Heckemann, A Urbank, D O Cosgrove, S D Taylor-Robinson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A previous pilot study showed that early arrival time of a microbubble in a hepatic vein is a sensitive indicator of cirrhosis. AIM: To see if this index can also grade diffuse liver disease. PATIENTS: Thirty nine fasted patients with histologically characterised disease were studied prospectively. Nine patients had no evidence of liver fibrosis, 10 had fibrosis without cirrhosis, and 20 had cirrhosis (five Child's A, seven Child's B, and eight Child's C).
METHODS: Bolus injections of a microbubble (Levovist; Schering, Berlin) were given intravenously, followed by a saline flush. Time intensity curves of hepatic vein and carotid artery spectral Doppler signals were analysed. Hepatic vein transit time (HVTT) was calculated as the time after injection at which a sustained signal increase >10% of baseline was seen. Carotid delay time (CDT) was calculated as the difference between carotid and hepatic vein enhancement.
RESULTS: Diagnostic studies were achieved in 38/39 subjects. Both HVTT and CDT became consistently shorter with worsening disease, as follows (means (SD)): HVTT: no fibrosis 44 (25) s, fibrosis 26 (8) s, Child's A 21 (1) s, Child's B 16 (3) s, and Child's C 16 (2) s; CDT: no fibrosis 31 (29) s, fibrosis 14 (6) s, Child's A 8 (1) s, Child's B 4 (4) s, and Child's C 3 (3) s. These differences were highly significant (p<0.001, ANOVA comparison). A HVTT <24 s and a CDT <10 s were 100% sensitive for cirrhosis (20/20 and 18/18, respectively) but not completely specific: 2/8 subjects with fibrosis had CDT values <10 s and 3/9 had HVTT <24 s.
CONCLUSION: This minimally invasive test shows promise not only in diagnosing cirrhosis but also in assessing disease severity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12865280      PMCID: PMC1773750          DOI: 10.1136/gut.52.8.1188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  19 in total

Review 1.  Liver mass evaluation with ultrasound: the impact of microbubble contrast agents and pulse inversion imaging.

Authors:  S R Wilson; P N Burns
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.115

Review 2.  Microbubble contrast agents: a new era in ultrasound.

Authors:  M J Blomley; J C Cooke; E C Unger; M J Monaghan; D O Cosgrove
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-19

3.  Liver biopsy:complications and risk factors.

Authors:  Pornpen Thampanitchawong; Teerha Piratvisuth
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  An audit of ultrasound guided liver biopsies: a need for evidence-based practice.

Authors:  M A Stone; J F Mayberry
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr

Review 5.  Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis.

Authors:  K Ishak; A Baptista; L Bianchi; F Callea; J De Groote; F Gudat; H Denk; V Desmet; G Korb; R N MacSween
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 25.083

6.  Quantitative echo contrast concentration measurement by Doppler sonography.

Authors:  K Q Schwarz; G P Bezante; X Chen; R Schlief
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Hepatic vein transit time of an ultrasound contrast agent: simplified procedure using pulse inversion imaging.

Authors:  N Bang; M B Nielsen; A N Rasmussen; P A Osterhammel; J F Pedersen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Management of chronic hepatitis C: clinical audit of biopsy based management algorithm.

Authors:  G R Foster; R D Goldin; J Main; I Murray-Lyon; S Hargreaves; H C Thomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-08-23

9.  Accuracy of ultrasonography in diagnosis of hepatocellular disease.

Authors:  B B Gosink; S K Lemon; W Scheible; G R Leopold
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Is ultrasonography useful in the assessment of diffuse parenchymal liver disease?

Authors:  N L Sanford; P Walsh; C Matis; H Baddeley; L W Powell
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  29 in total

1.  Assessment of tissue perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Emilio Quaia
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Imaging of perfusion using ultrasound.

Authors:  David Cosgrove; Nathalie Lassau
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Quantitative tissue blood flow measurement of the liver parenchyma: comparison between xenon CT and perfusion CT.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Hashimoto; Takamichi Murakami; Keizo Dono; Masatoshi Hori; Tonsok Kim; Masayuki Kudo; Shigeru Marubashi; Atsushi Miyamoto; Yutaka Takeda; Hiroaki Nagano; Koji Umeshita; Hironobu Nakamura; Morito Monden
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: an update.

Authors:  Emilio Quaia
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-03-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Invasive and non-invasive diagnosis of cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

Authors:  Moon Young Kim; Woo Kyoung Jeong; Soon Koo Baik
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the evaluation of liver fibrosis after biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Hyun Joo Shin; Eun Young Chang; Hye Sun Lee; Jung Hwa Hong; Gyuri Park; Hyun Gi Kim; Myung-Joon Kim; Mi-Jung Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Simultaneous grayscale and subharmonic ultrasound imaging on a modified commercial scanner.

Authors:  J R Eisenbrey; J K Dave; V G Halldorsdottir; D A Merton; P Machado; J B Liu; C Miller; J M Gonzalez; S Park; S Dianis; C L Chalek; K E Thomenius; D B Brown; V Navarro; F Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  Diagnosis of liver cirrhosis with contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Guang-Jian Liu; Ming-De Lu
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-01-28

9.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for quantitative assessment of portal pressure in canine liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Lin Zhai; Lan-Yan Qiu; Yuan Zu; Yan Yan; Xiao-Zhuan Ren; Jun-Feng Zhao; Yu-Jiang Liu; Ji-Bin Liu; Lin-Xue Qian
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Diagnosis of liver cirrhosis by transit-time analysis at contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Authors:  T Abbattista; F Ridolfi; E Ciabattoni; F Marini; E Bendia; E Brunelli; P Busilacchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.