PURPOSE: The aims of this prospective study were to evaluate analysis of sulfur-hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent (Sonovue) transit times as a tool for differentiating liver cirrhosis from the noncirrhotic stage of liver disease and to compare its performance with that of conventional B-mode and Doppler ultrasonography (US). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Contrast-enhanced hepatic ultrasonography with the US contrast agent Sonovue was performed on 38 patients with diagnoses of hepatic cirrhosis based on unequivocal clinical signs or liver biopsy findings (Child-Pugh classes A in 19, B in 16 and C in three), 31 patients with noncirrhotic diffuse liver disease (biopsy confirmed) and 14 controls without diffuse liver disease. Time curves of hepatic-vein signal intensity were analysed using objective criteria to determine the time of enhancement onset (hepatic-vein arrival time) and peak enhancement (hepatic-vein peak enhancement). Accuracy in diagnosing cirrhosis was compared with that based on B-mode and Doppler data. RESULTS: Hepatic-vein arrival time in cirrhotic patients was significantly shorter (p < 0.01) than in noncirrhotic (chronic liver disease and controls) patients. Peak enhancement times in these three groups were not significantly different. An arrival-time cutoff of 17 s distinguished cirrhotic from noncirrhotic patients with high accuracy (100% sensitivity, 93.3% specificity, positive and negative predictive values 92.6% and 100%, respectively) and excellent reproducibility (kappa coefficients of 1.0 and 0.93 for intraand interobserver agreement). Contrast-enhanced US showed better sensitivity than the B-mode and Doppler data. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the time of onset of US contrast enhancement of the hepatic vein appears to be a potentially useful noninvasive supplement to conventional sonography and Doppler in the follow-up of patients with chronic diffuse liver disease.
PURPOSE: The aims of this prospective study were to evaluate analysis of sulfur-hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent (Sonovue) transit times as a tool for differentiating liver cirrhosis from the noncirrhotic stage of liver disease and to compare its performance with that of conventional B-mode and Doppler ultrasonography (US). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Contrast-enhanced hepatic ultrasonography with the US contrast agent Sonovue was performed on 38 patients with diagnoses of hepatic cirrhosis based on unequivocal clinical signs or liver biopsy findings (Child-Pugh classes A in 19, B in 16 and C in three), 31 patients with noncirrhotic diffuse liver disease (biopsy confirmed) and 14 controls without diffuse liver disease. Time curves of hepatic-vein signal intensity were analysed using objective criteria to determine the time of enhancement onset (hepatic-vein arrival time) and peak enhancement (hepatic-vein peak enhancement). Accuracy in diagnosing cirrhosis was compared with that based on B-mode and Doppler data. RESULTS: Hepatic-vein arrival time in cirrhotic patients was significantly shorter (p < 0.01) than in noncirrhotic (chronic liver disease and controls) patients. Peak enhancement times in these three groups were not significantly different. An arrival-time cutoff of 17 s distinguished cirrhotic from noncirrhotic patients with high accuracy (100% sensitivity, 93.3% specificity, positive and negative predictive values 92.6% and 100%, respectively) and excellent reproducibility (kappa coefficients of 1.0 and 0.93 for intraand interobserver agreement). Contrast-enhanced US showed better sensitivity than the B-mode and Doppler data. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the time of onset of US contrast enhancement of the hepatic vein appears to be a potentially useful noninvasive supplement to conventional sonography and Doppler in the follow-up of patients with chronic diffuse liver disease.
Authors: K Ohnishi; N Chin; M Saito; H Tanaka; H Terabayashi; T Nakayama; S Iida; F Nomura; K Okuda Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 1986-10 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: F Oberti; E Valsesia; C Pilette; M C Rousselet; P Bedossa; C Aubé; Y Gallois; H Rifflet; M Y Maïga; D Penneau-Fontbonne; P Calès Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1997-11 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: P S Kamath; R H Wiesner; M Malinchoc; W Kremers; T M Therneau; C L Kosberg; G D'Amico; E R Dickson; W R Kim Journal: Hepatology Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: E Giannini; F Botta; P Borro; D Risso; P Romagnoli; A Fasoli; M R Mele; E Testa; C Mansi; V Savarino; R Testa Journal: Gut Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 23.059