Literature DB >> 12861539

In-line image projection accelerates task performance in laparoscopic appendectomy.

Kamil Erfanian1, François I Luks, Arlet G Kurkchubasche, Conrad W Wesselhoeft, Thomas F Tracy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In laparoscopy, the monitor usually is placed at or above eye level across from the operating surgeon. Position of the endoscopic image at hand level has been shown in a laboratory model to facilitate task performance. The authors tested the hypothesis that in-line image projection reduced operating time for a standardized procedure.
METHODS: Children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy were assigned randomly according to video image position: (1) at the top of the laparoscopy tower in front of the surgeon ("overhead") or (2) on a screen placed on the patient's abdomen ("in-line"). Operating time was recorded for each operation, and patients were stratified according to severity of appendicitis and training level of the operating surgeon. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t, chi2 tests, and analysis of variance with post-hoc Fisher test (P <.05. significant).
RESULTS: One hundred eight children, aged 2 to 17 years, underwent a laparoscopic appendectomy during a 26-month period. Fifty-four were assigned to the in-line projection screen and 54 to the overhead monitor. Operating time was significantly shorter (P =.013) when in-line projection was used (46.8 +/- 10.2 v. 52.2 +/- 15.1 minutes with overhead monitor). By analysis of variance (ANOVA) the only factors that significantly affected operating time were use of in-line projection (P =.030), severity of appendicitis (P =.002), and training level of the operating surgeon (P =.047).
CONCLUSIONS: Placing the endoscopic image in the same field as the surgeon's hands decreases operating time by 10%, even for procedures that, like appendectomy, do not require complex suturing skills. This decrease in operating time occurs independently of the surgeon's level of proficiency or the degree of difficulty of the operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12861539     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(03)00192-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  8 in total

1.  Image inversion and digital mirror-image technology aid laparoscopic surgery task performance in the paradoxical view: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Richdeep S Gill; David P Al-Adra; Harshdeep Mangat; Haili Wang; Xinzhe Shi; Cliff Sample
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparison of a supplemental wide field of view versus a single field of view with zoom on performance in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Alex Cao; R Darin Ellis; Elizabeth D Klein; Gregory W Auner; Michael D Klein; Abhilash K Pandya
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Ergonomic assessment of neck posture in the minimally invasive surgery suite during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M J van Det; W J H J Meijerink; C Hoff; M A van Veelen; J P E N Pierie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Interoperative efficiency in minimally invasive surgery suites.

Authors:  M J van Det; W J H J Meijerink; C Hoff; J P E N Pierie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Ergonomic assessment of the French and American position for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the MIS Suite.

Authors:  Kelvin H Kramp; Marc J van Det; Eric R Totte; Christiaan Hoff; Jean-Pierre E N Pierie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive surgery suites: a review and guidelines.

Authors:  M J van Det; W J H J Meijerink; C Hoff; E R Totté; J P E N Pierie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Surgical ergonomics for urologists: a practical guide.

Authors:  Andrew T Gabrielson; Marisa M Clifton; Christian P Pavlovich; Michael J Biles; Mitchell Huang; Jacqueline Agnew; Phillip M Pierorazio; Brian R Matlaga; Petar Bajic; Zeyad R Schwen
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Monitor height ergonomics: A comparison of operating room video display terminals.

Authors:  Gregory I Kelts; Kevin C McMains; Phillip G Chen; Erik K Weitzel
Journal:  Allergy Rhinol (Providence)       Date:  2015-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.