Literature DB >> 21638184

Image inversion and digital mirror-image technology aid laparoscopic surgery task performance in the paradoxical view: a randomized controlled trial.

Richdeep S Gill1, David P Al-Adra, Harshdeep Mangat, Haili Wang, Xinzhe Shi, Cliff Sample.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As laparoscopic surgical procedures increase in complexity, surgeons may find themselves with the laparoscope opposite to their laparoscopic instruments, thus creating the paradoxical viewpoint. We assessed whether surgical task performance in the paradoxical viewpoint would be improved by digitally altering the image or by changing the camera orientation.
METHODS: Sixty-one laparoscopically naïve operators performed a Peg Transfer task using a trainer box. In the first "round," naïve operators were block-randomized to perform the Peg-Transfer task either in the standard view or the paradoxical view. In the second "round," naïve operators were positioned in the paradoxical view and block-randomized to having the monitor image as paradoxical (n = 19) or altered by being digitally flipped (mirror-image) (n = 22) or inverted (n = 20). The task consisted of transferring six plastic objects in 5 min (300 s). Scoring was based on the formula of total time = time to completion (max = 300 s) + penalty time (50 s/peg not transferred).
RESULTS: In the first round, average total time to perform the Peg Transfer task using the standard view was 215 ± 20 s, which was significantly less (P < 0.001) than the 563 ± 13 s for the paradoxical view. In the second round (with all naïve operators in the paradoxical viewpoint), the total time for the paradoxical image, digitally flipped image (mirror-image), and inverted image were 561 ± 12, 449 ± 25, and 259 ± 37 s, respectively. The total time for the inverted image was significantly less than both the paradoxical image and digitally flipped image (P < 0.001). The total time for the digitally flipped image was also less than paradoxical image (P < 0.05). The group with the paradoxical image completed 0.8 ± 0.2 peg transfers, which was less than both the digitally flipped and inverted-view groups (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate that when in the paradoxical viewpoint, altering the image on the video monitor, either by digitally flipping or inverting the image, can improve surgical task performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21638184     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1754-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  14 in total

1.  Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Peters; Gerald M Fried; Lee L Swanstrom; Nathaniel J Soper; Lelan F Sillin; Bruce Schirmer; Kaaren Hoffman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Effect of the angle between the optical axis of the endoscope and the instruments' plane on monitor image and surgical performance.

Authors:  P V Patil; G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Optimization of the projection screen in a display system for minimal access surgery.

Authors:  S I Brown; T G Frank; A Cuschieri; R Sharpe; C Cartwright
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Characterizing the "gold standard" image for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  S I Brown; C White; K Wipat; G B Hanna; T G Frank; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Simulated laparoscopy using a head-mounted display vs traditional video monitor: an assessment of performance and muscle fatigue.

Authors:  S K Maithel; L Villegas; N Stylopoulos; S Dawson; D B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Reverse-alignment surgical skills assessment.

Authors:  Jon C Gould; James Frydman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Certification pass rate of 100% for fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skills after proficiency-based training.

Authors:  Daniel J Scott; E Matt Ritter; Seifu T Tesfay; Elisabeth A Pimentel; Alykhan Nagji; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Eliminating the effects of paradoxic imaging during laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Adam A Abodeely; Yee-Lee Cheah; Beth A Ryder; Jeremy T Aidlen; Francois I Luks
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.878

9.  Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  A M Derossis; G M Fried; M Abrahamowicz; H H Sigman; J S Barkun; J L Meakins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Image converter eliminates mirror imaging during laparoscopy.

Authors:  William K Johnston; Roger K Low; Sakti Das
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Usefulness of a 180° Rotatable Monitor for an Assistant to Overcome the Hand-Eye Discordance in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Sungjin Kim; Sung Il Kang; So Hyun Kim; Jae-Hwang Kim
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2020-09-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.