Literature DB >> 12859045

The biological basis of non-invasive strategies for selection of human oocytes and embryos.

Lynette Scott1.   

Abstract

There is a need for more accurate embryo selection in human assisted reproduction, if the goal of reducing the number of embryos used in embryo transfer is to be realized. Furthermore, any selection strategy should be non-invasive if the embryos are to be used in embryo transfer. Currently, the strategy is selection by one to three parameters in the cleaving- and blastocyst-stage embryo, sometimes with additional pronuclear selection. It is clear that no one system is ideal, as the vast majority of transferred embryos do not implant. As the health of the embryo is largely dictated by the originating gametes, the very early events in oocyte development should be considered. This review will point to the early biological events in the unfertilized and fertilized oocyte that can be scored non-invasively and which can have a profound effect on the later developmental stages. Using a sequential scoring system, with emphasis on the oocyte, a system for selecting the most viable single embryo for transfer may hopefully be achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12859045     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmg023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  22 in total

1.  Procedure for rapid oocyte selection based on quantitative analysis of cumulus cell gene expression.

Authors:  Stefania Ferrari; Debora Lattuada; Alessio Paffoni; Tiziana A L Brevini; Claudia Scarduelli; Giorgio Bolis; Guido Ragni; Fulvio Gandolfi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Cytoplasmic pitting has a negative influence on implantation outcome.

Authors:  Thomas Ebner; Gernot Tews; Michael Sommergruber; Marianne Moser
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Sarah Armstrong; Priya Bhide; Vanessa Jordan; Allan Pacey; Jane Marjoribanks; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-29

4.  The association between multinucleated blastomeres and poor ovarian response under the Bologna criteria.

Authors:  Johnny S Younis; Vicky Yazdi; Ido Izhaki; Moshe Ben-Ami
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Endometrial pattern, but not endometrial thickness, affects implantation rates in euploid embryo transfers.

Authors:  Julian A Gingold; Joseph A Lee; Jorge Rodriguez-Purata; Michael C Whitehouse; Benjamin Sandler; Lawrence Grunfeld; Tanmoy Mukherjee; Alan B Copperman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Effect of sperm entry on blastocyst development after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection - mouse model.

Authors:  Karolina Piotrowska-Nitsche; Anthony W S Chan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Does first polar body morphology predict oocyte performance during ICSI treatment?

Authors:  Johnny S Younis; Orit Radin; Ido Izhaki; Moshe Ben-Ami
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Comparison of the development of human embryos cultured in either an EmbryoScope or benchtop incubator.

Authors:  R Sciorio; J K Thong; S J Pickering
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  The clinical outcomes of day 3 4-cell embryos after extended in vitro culture.

Authors:  Ping Zhao; Ming Li; Ying Lian; Xiaoying Zheng; Ping Liu; Jie Qiao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Embryonic Development in Relation to Maternal Age and Conception Probability.

Authors:  Oshrit Lebovitz; Mediea Michaeli; Nardin Aslih; Diana Poltov; Daniela Estrada; Yuval Atzmon; Einat Shalom-Paz
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.060

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.