Literature DB >> 12858277

The ontogeny of fluctuating asymmetry.

James R Kellner1, Ross A Alford.   

Abstract

We tested seven hypotheses regarding the mechanisms by which fluctuating asymmetry (FA) originates. We did this by analyzing data on four bilateral characters measured repeatedly during the development of individual domestic fowl. Immediately posthatching, there was substantial directional asymmetry, which rapidly decreased. We detected FA at significant levels in all characters in the majority of our measurements over the remainder of development. We also examined the effects of known environmental stressors (food and density stress) on levels of FA. At the levels we examined, changes in these stressors did not alter the degree of asymmetry we found in fowl. Time series of asymmetry for individuals did not exhibit regular oscillations, as much of the relevant literature predicts. Asymmetry levels reflected the combined effects of developmental noise, which was random in degree and direction, and feedback processes, which decreased asymmetry by altering growth rates on both sides of the body. Our findings best fit the predictions of the residual asymmetry and compensatory growth hypotheses, which suggest that levels of asymmetry reflect only recent growth history.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12858277     DOI: 10.1086/375177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  7 in total

1.  Coordination of bilateral tooth replacement in the juvenile gecko is continuous with in ovo patterning.

Authors:  Theresa M Grieco; Joy M Richman
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 1.930

2.  Dispersal without errors: symmetrical ears tune into the right frequency for survival.

Authors:  Monica Gagliano; Martial Depczynski; Stephen D Simpson; James A Y Moore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Differences between rodent taxa in fluctuating asymmetry of cranial structures.

Authors:  I A Kshnyasev; E A Gileva; A V Borodin; L E Yalkovskaya; S V Zykov
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug

4.  Are large wattles related to particular MHC genotypes in the male pheasant?

Authors:  Mariella Baratti; Martina Ammannati; Claudia Magnelli; Alessandro Massolo; Francesco Dessì-Fulgheri
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 5.  Stochasticity or the fatal 'imperfection' of cloning.

Authors:  Reiner A Veitia
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.795

6.  Testing the relationship between human occupancy in the landscape and tadpole developmental stress.

Authors:  Paula C Eterovick; Luís F F Bar; Jorge B Souza; José F M Castro; Felipe S F Leite; Ross A Alford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Differences in fear response strategy and stress susceptibility amongst four different commercial layer strains reared cage free.

Authors:  Austin A Brown; Eric B Sobotik; Gabrielle M House; Jill R Nelson; Gregory S Archer
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.755

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.