Literature DB >> 12855886

Number, incidence, and projections of distal forearm fractures admitted to hospital in Australia.

Alison E R Wigg1, Trevor C Hearn, Kieran A McCaul, Sonia M Anderton, Vanessa M Wells, Jeganath Krishnan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study documents the number, incidence, and relative risk (RR) of distal forearm fractures requiring admission to hospital in Australia in 1997 and estimates of the projected numbers for 2021.
METHODS: Distal forearm fracture numbers from 1993 to 1998 were obtained. The incidence and RR were calculated by gender and 5-year age groups for 1997. Projected numbers for 2021 were estimated using population projection data.
RESULTS: In 1997, fracture numbers were 12357 for male patients and 19319 for female patients. The incidence was 152 per 100000 for male patients and 157 per 100000 for female patients. The highest incidence and RR was in the 10- to 14-year age group for male patients and in the 85 years and over age group for female patients. If fracture incidence remains constant (on the basis of predicted population changes in Australia), by 2021, it is estimated that fracture numbers for people 50 years of age and over will increase by 81%, compared with 11% for people under 50. In the older age group, the number for women will be 4.7 times higher than for men.
CONCLUSION: This study quantifies the potential disproportionate increase in distal forearm fractures requiring admission in Australia, particularly for female patients, because of an aging population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12855886     DOI: 10.1097/01.TA.0000038544.45839.3D

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  8 in total

1.  A population-based study on trend in incidence of distal radial fractures in adults in Taiwan in 2000-2007.

Authors:  C-H Tsai; C-H Muo; Y-C Fong; W-Y Lo; Y-J Chen; H-C Hsu; F-C Sung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Urban-rural differences in distal forearm fractures: Cohort Norway.

Authors:  A J Søgaard; T K Gustad; E Bjertness; G S Tell; B Schei; N Emaus; H E Meyer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Which bone mass measures discriminate adolescents who have fractured from those who have not?

Authors:  G Jones; P Boon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  Sundeep Khosla; Shreyasee Amin; Eric Orwoll
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 19.871

5.  Epidemiology of distal forearm fractures in Austria between 1989 and 2010.

Authors:  H P Dimai; A Svedbom; A Fahrleitner-Pammer; H Resch; C Muschitz; H Thaler; M Szivak; K Amrein; F Borgström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Open reduction and internal fixation versus casting for highly comminuted and intra-articular fractures of the distal radius (ORCHID): protocol for a randomized clinical multi-center trial.

Authors:  Christoph Bartl; Dirk Stengel; Thomas Bruckner; Inga Rossion; Steffen Luntz; Christoph Seiler; Florian Gebhard
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Predicting fracture outcomes from clinical registry data using artificial intelligence supplemented models for evidence-informed treatment (PRAISE) study protocol.

Authors:  Joanna F Dipnall; Richard Page; Lan Du; Matthew Costa; Ronan A Lyons; Peter Cameron; Richard de Steiger; Raphael Hau; Andrew Bucknill; Andrew Oppy; Elton Edwards; Dinesh Varma; Myong Chol Jung; Belinda J Gabbe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Short Term Outcomes Following Open Reduction Internal Fixation Surgery for a Distal Radius Fracture: 2 Week Versus 4 Week Immobilization. A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Angela Toemen; Shirley Collocott; Wolfgang Heiss-Dunlop
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-03-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.