Literature DB >> 12853788

Laparoscopic nephrectomy: assessment of morcellation versus intact specimen extraction on postoperative status.

Fernando Hernandez1, Koon H Rha, Peter A Pinto, Fernando J Kim, Nicholas Klicos, Theresa Y Chan, Louis R Kavoussi, Thomas W Jarrett.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared pathological evaluation and postoperative recovery in patients undergoing transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy at our institution with morcellated vs intact specimen extraction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective evaluation of 57 consecutive patients undergoing radical and simple transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy was reviewed. One patient was excluded from study due to transitional cell carcinoma, which was detected intraoperatively. The 33 morcellated specimens were extracted at the umbilical port and the 23 intact specimens were extracted through a midline infraumbilical incision. Data were obtained on narcotic requirements, hospital stay, complications, estimated blood loss, mass size based on preoperative imaging, specimen weight and extraction incision length.
RESULTS: Mean incision length in the morcellated and intact specimen removal groups was 1.2 and 7.1 cm, respectively (p <0.001). No significant differences in pain or recovery were noted between the 2 groups. Two cases of microscopic invasion of the perinephric adipose tissue in the intact specimen group were up staged from clinical T1 to pT3a disease. No change in patient treatment was made based on this information.
CONCLUSIONS: We did not find a significant difference in surgical time, pain or hospital stay. Only incision length was statistically significant. Postoperative recovery appeared to be similar in these 2 groups. With modern imaging modalities information on pathological stage did not alter patient treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12853788     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000076667.70020.82

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  5 in total

Review 1.  Justification of extraperitoneal laparoscopic access for surgery of the upper urinary tract.

Authors:  András Hoznek; Laurent Salomon; Matthew Gettman; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Clément-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery for radical and cytoreductive nephrectomy, renal vein thrombectomy, and partial nephrectomy: a prospective pilot evaluation.

Authors:  Ithaar H Derweesh; Jonathan L Silberstein; Wassim Bazzi; Ryan Kopp; Tracy M Downs; Christopher J Kane
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2010-06-07

3.  Oncologic outcome of 132 cases of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with intact specimen removal for T1-2N0M0 renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ashok K Hemal; Anup Kumar; Narmada P Gupta; Rajeev Kumar
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Robotic treatment of oligometastatic kidney tumor with synchronous pancreatic metastasis: case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Andrea Boni; Giovanni Cochetti; Stefano Ascani; Michele Del Zingaro; Francesca Quadrini; Alessio Paladini; Diego Cocca; Ettore Mearini
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy versus conventional laparoendoscopic nephrectomy for kidney tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dengyuan Feng; Rong Cong; Hong Cheng; Yi Wang; Jiajun Zhou; Jiadong Xia; Min Gu
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.840

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.