Literature DB >> 17786453

Oncologic outcome of 132 cases of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with intact specimen removal for T1-2N0M0 renal cell carcinoma.

Ashok K Hemal1, Anup Kumar, Narmada P Gupta, Rajeev Kumar.   

Abstract

We present the short and long-term oncologic outcome of 132 patients with pathologically confirmed T1-T2, N0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC), who underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with intact specimen removal at our institution. Beginning January 1998, we prospectively collected data of 132 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, whose final pathologic stage was T1 or T2, N0M0, RCC. The clinical data of three groups categorized as group (pT1a)--36 patients, group (pT1b)--51 patients and group (pT2)--45 patients were analyzed statistically to assess oncological outcome. The specimens were removed intact without morcellation in all patients in a homemade plastic bag. The total median follow-up was 56 months (range 3-80 months) and there were no local or port-site recurrences or hernia. Patients with pT2 tumors had significantly greater operating time, blood loss and analgesic requirements than pT1a/pT1b tumor patients. The distant metastases were found in 1, 4 and 5 patients in group pT1a, pT1b and pT2, respectively. The 5-year cancer-specific survival was 97.2, 86.3 and 82.2%, respectively, in pT1a, pT1b and pT2 tumor patients (significantly lower in pT2 than pT1a, P = 0.008). The 5-year recurrence-free survival was 97.2, 84.3 and 82.2%, respectively, in pT1a, pT1b and pT2 tumor patients (significantly lower in pT2 than pT1a, P = 0.02). Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (retroperitoneal and transperitoneal route) with intact specimen removal for localized renal cell carcinoma (T1-2N0M0) provides satisfactory short and long-term oncologic efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17786453     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-007-0210-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  28 in total

1.  Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 100 patients: a single center experience from the United States.

Authors:  I S Gill; A M Meraney; D K Schweizer; S S Savage; M G Hobart; G T Sung; D Nelson; A C Novick
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Long-term followup after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Portis; Yan Yan; Jaime Landman; Cathy Chen; Peter H Barrett; Donald D Fentie; Yoshinari Ono; Elspeth M McDougall; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  High-resolution multidetector CT in the preoperative evaluation of patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  C Catalano; F Fraioli; A Laghi; A Napoli; F Pediconi; M Danti; P Nardis; R Passariello
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience.

Authors:  M D Dunn; A J Portis; A L Shalhav; A M Elbahnasy; C Heidorn; E M McDougall; R V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Impact of lymphadenectomy and nodal burden in renal cell carcinoma: retrospective analysis of the National Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

Authors:  Sue A Joslyn; S Joseph Sirintrapun; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Evaluation of the intact specimen after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for clinically localized renal cell carcinoma identifies a subset of patients at increased risk for recurrence.

Authors:  Daniel D Cohen; Surena F Matin; Jordan R Steinberg; Robin Zagone; Christopher G Wood
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Laparoscopic specimen extraction: morcellation.

Authors:  Ioannis Varkarakis; Khoon Rha; Fernando Hernandez; Louis R Kavoussi; Thomas W Jarrett
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 8.  The role of lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Courtney K Phillips; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.498

9.  Application of TNM, 2002 version, in localized renal cell carcinoma: is it able to predict different cancer-specific survival probability?

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Antonio Galfano; Giovanni Novella; Dionisio Schiavone; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Prognostic significance of tumour size in patients after tumour nephrectomy for localised renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas Steiner; Ralf Knels; Joerg Schubert
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  9 in total

1.  Early immune outcome of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Yang Lu; Fan Tianyong; Wei Qiang; Cui Xiaobo; Bu Siyuan; Han Ping
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Outcomes of curative nephrectomy against renal cell carcinoma based on a central pathological review of 914 specimens from the era of cytokine treatment.

Authors:  Noriyuki Ito; Shinsuke Kojima; Satoshi Teramukai; Yoshiki Mikami; Osamu Ogawa; Tomomi Kamba
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for kidney cancer resection: Dundee cohort and metaanalysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Campbell Tait; Salil Tandon; Lee Baker; Chris Goodman; Nicholas Townell; Ghulam Nabi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Transient variations in the serum concentrations of cell adhesion molecules following retroperitoneal laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy for localized renal-cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Lu Yang; Tianyong Fan; Qiang Wei; Xiaobo Cui; Siyuan Bu; Ping Han
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 5.  Surgical management of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Laura-Maria Krabbe; Aditya Bagrodia; Vitaly Margulis; Christopher G Wood
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  Analysis of long-term survival in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma: laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Jun-Hang Luo; Fang-Jian Zhou; Dan Xie; Zhi-Ling Zhang; Bing Liao; Hong-Wei Zhao; Yu-Ping Dai; Ling-Wu Chen; Wei Chen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Changing concepts in the surgery of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Axel S Merseburger; Markus A Kuczyk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Propensity-matched pair analysis of safety and efficacy between laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy for the treatment of large renal masses (>10 cm): a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Xinwen Nian; Huamao Ye; Wei Zhang; Kaixuan Zhang; Xu Gao; Bo Yang; Jianguo Hou; Chuanliang Xu; Linhui Wang; Yan Wang; Wenhui Zhang; Xiaolei Shi
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-08

9.  The contemporary role of surgery in kidney cancer.

Authors:  J B Lattouf; Q D Trinh; F Saad
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.