Literature DB >> 12852471

Cancer risks from medical radiation.

Elaine Ron1.   

Abstract

About 15% of the ionizing radiation exposure to the general public comes from artificial sources, and almost all of this exposure is due to medical radiation, largely from diagnostic procedures. Of the approximately 3 mSv annual global per caput effective dose estimated for the year 2000, 2.4 mSv is from natural background and 0.4 mSv from diagnostic medical exams. Diagnostic and therapeutic radiation was used in patients as early as 1896. Since then, continual improvements in diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy as well as the aging of our population have led to greater use of medical radiation. Temporal trends indicate that worldwide population exposure from medical radiation is increasing. In the United States, there has been a steady rise in the use of diagnostic radiologic procedures, especially x rays. Radiotherapy also has increased so that today about 40% of cancer patients receive some treatment with radiation. Epidemiologic data on medically irradiated populations are an important complement to the atomic-bomb survivors' studies. Significant improvement in cancer treatment over the last few decades has resulted in longer survival and a growing number of radiation-related second cancers. Following high-dose radiotherapy for malignant diseases, elevated risks of a variety of radiation-related second cancers have been observed. Risks have been particularly high following treatment for childhood cancer. Radiation treatment for benign disease was relatively common from the 1940's to the 1960's. While these treatments generally were effective, some resulted in enhanced cancer risks. As more was learned about radiation-associated cancer risks and new treatments became available, the use of radiotherapy for benign disease has declined. At moderate doses, such as those used to treat benign diseases, radiation-related cancers occur in or near the radiation field. Cancers of the thyroid, salivary gland, central nervous system, skin, and breast as well as leukemia have been associated with radiotherapy for tinea capitis, enlarged tonsils or thymus gland, other benign conditions of the head and neck, or benign breast diseases. Because doses from diagnostic examinations typically are low, they are difficult to study using epidemiologic methods, unless multiple examinations are performed. An excess risk of breast cancer has been reported among women with tuberculosis who had multiple chest fluoroscopies as well as among scoliosis patients who had frequent diagnostic x rays during late childhood and adolescence. Dental and medical diagnostic x rays performed many years ago, when doses were presumed to be high, also have been linked to increased cancer risks. The carcinogenic effects of diagnostic and therapeutic radionuclides are less well characterized. High risks of liver cancer and leukemia have been demonstrated following thorotrast injections, and patients treated with radium appear to have an elevated risk of bone sarcomas and possibly cancers of the breast, liver, kidney, thyroid, and bladder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12852471     DOI: 10.1097/00004032-200307000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  82 in total

1.  Parathyroid four-dimensional computed tomography: evaluation of radiation dose exposure during preoperative localization of parathyroid tumors in primary hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  Amit Mahajan; Lee F Starker; Monica Ghita; Robert Udelsman; James A Brink; Tobias Carling
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Exposing the thyroid to radiation: a review of its current extent, risks, and implications.

Authors:  Bridget Sinnott; Elaine Ron; Arthur B Schneider
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 3.  Effects of radiation exposure from cardiac imaging: how good are the data?

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Methodology for determining doses to in-field, out-of-field and partially in-field organs for late effects studies in photon radiotherapy.

Authors:  Rebecca M Howell; Sarah B Scarboro; Phillip J Taddei; Sunil Krishnan; Stephen F Kry; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures.

Authors:  Martha S Linet; Thomas L Slovis; Donald L Miller; Ruth Kleinerman; Choonsik Lee; Preetha Rajaraman; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Effect of organ size and position on out-of-field dose distributions during radiation therapy.

Authors:  Sarah B Scarboro; Marilyn Stovall; Allen White; Susan A Smith; Derek Yaldo; Stephen F Kry; Rebecca M Howell
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Malignant transformation and new primary tumours after therapeutic radiation for benign disease: substantial risks in certain tumour prone syndromes.

Authors:  D G R Evans; J M Birch; R T Ramsden; S Sharif; M E Baser
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Work history and radioprotection practices in relation to cancer incidence and mortality in US radiologic technologists performing nuclear medicine procedures.

Authors:  Marie Odile Bernier; Michele M Doody; Miriam E Van Dyke; Daphné Villoing; Bruce H Alexander; Martha S Linet; Cari M Kitahara
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Doses of Ukrainian female clean-up workers with diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Vadim V Chumak; Sergiy V Klymenko; Horst Zitzelsberger; Christina Wilke; Lyudmila A Rybchenko; Elena V Bakhanova
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 1.925

10.  Increased frequency of chromosome translocations associated with diagnostic x-ray examinations.

Authors:  Parveen Bhatti; Michele M Doody; Dale L Preston; Diane Kampa; Elaine Ron; Robert W Weinstock; Steven Simon; Alan A Edwards; Alice J Sigurdson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.841

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.