Literature DB >> 29720482

Work history and radioprotection practices in relation to cancer incidence and mortality in US radiologic technologists performing nuclear medicine procedures.

Marie Odile Bernier1,2, Michele M Doody1, Miriam E Van Dyke3, Daphné Villoing1, Bruce H Alexander4, Martha S Linet1, Cari M Kitahara1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Technologists working in nuclear medicine (NM) are exposed to higher radiation doses than most other occupationally exposed populations. The aim of this study was to estimate the risk of cancer in NM technologists in relation to work history, procedures performed and radioprotection practices.
METHODS: From the US Radiologic Technologists cohort study, 72 755 radiologic technologists who completed a 2003-2005 questionnaire were followed for cancer mortality through 31 December 2012 and for cancer incidence through completion of a questionnaire in 2012-2013. Multivariable-adjusted models were used to estimate HRs for total cancer incidence and mortality by history of ever performing NM procedures and frequency of performing specific diagnostic or therapeutic NM procedures and associated radiation protection measures by decade.
RESULTS: During follow-up (mean=7.5 years), 960 incident cancers and 425 cancer deaths were reported among the 22 360 technologists who worked with NM procedures. We observed no increased risk of cancer incidence (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.04) or death (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.19) among workers who ever performed NM procedures. HRs for cancer incidence but not mortality were higher for technologists who began performing therapeutic procedures in 1960 and later compared with the 1950s. Frequency of performing diagnostic or therapeutic NM procedures and use of radioprotection measures were not consistently associated with cancer risk. No clear associations were observed for specific cancers, but results were based on small numbers.
CONCLUSION: Cancer incidence and mortality were not associated with NM work history practices, including greater frequency of procedures performed. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; cohort study; ionising radiation; nuclear medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29720482      PMCID: PMC6051924          DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2017-104559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  30 in total

1.  Radiation organ doses received in a nationwide cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists: methods and findings.

Authors:  Steven L Simon; Dale L Preston; Martha S Linet; Jeremy S Miller; Alice J Sigurdson; Bruce H Alexander; Deukwoo Kwon; R Craig Yoder; Parveen Bhatti; Mark P Little; Preetha Rajaraman; Dunstana Melo; Vladimir Drozdovitch; Robert M Weinstock; Michele M Doody
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Occupational exposure in nuclear medicine in Portugal in the 1999-2003 period.

Authors:  M B Martins; J G Alves; J N Abrantes; A R Roda
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  NCRP report 160 and what it means for medical imaging and nuclear medicine.

Authors:  Norman E Bolus
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2013-10-31

4.  Mortality among United States radiologic technologists, 1926-90.

Authors:  M M Doody; J S Mandel; J H Lubin; J D Boice
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  A U.S. Multicenter Study of Recorded Occupational Radiation Badge Doses in Nuclear Medicine.

Authors:  Daphnée Villoing; R Craig Yoder; Christopher Passmore; Marie-Odile Bernier; Cari M Kitahara
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Properties of proportional-hazards score tests under misspecified regression models.

Authors:  S W Lagakos; D A Schoenfeld
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Solid cancer incidence among Chinese medical diagnostic x-ray workers, 1950-1995: Estimation of radiation-related risks.

Authors:  Zhijuan Sun; Peter D Inskip; Jixian Wang; Deukwoo Kwon; Yongcheng Zhao; Liangan Zhang; Qin Wang; Saijun Fan
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998.

Authors:  D L Preston; E Ron; S Tokuoka; S Funamoto; N Nishi; M Soda; K Mabuchi; K Kodama
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Health outcomes of low-dose ionizing radiation exposure among medical workers: a cohort study of the Canadian national dose registry of radiation workers.

Authors:  Jan M Zielinski; Michael J Garner; Pierre R Band; Daniel Krewski; Natalia S Shilnikova; Huixia Jiang; Patrick J Ashmore; Willem N Sont; Martha E Fair; Ernest G Letourneau; Robert Semenciw
Journal:  Int J Occup Med Environ Health       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.843

10.  Risk of cancer from occupational exposure to ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study of workers in France, the United Kingdom, and the United States (INWORKS).

Authors:  David B Richardson; Elisabeth Cardis; Robert D Daniels; Michael Gillies; Jacqueline A O'Hagan; Ghassan B Hamra; Richard Haylock; Dominique Laurier; Klervi Leuraud; Monika Moissonnier; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Ausrele Kesminiene
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-10-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.