Literature DB >> 12849713

Measuring clinical pain in chronic widespread pain: selected methodological issues.

Michael Gendreau1, Michael R Hufford, Arthur A Stone.   

Abstract

Assessing clinical pain is an important task in clinical practice and research. A large empirical literature has documented that patients' pain reports can be systematically biased by a number of methodological factors. This chapter reviews a selection of methodological issues that can affect pain ratings, including: the impact of recall bias, the use of paper and electronic diaries to assess pain experiences, ecological momentary assessment methods as a way of capturing real-time pain data in the real world, and pain scaling and data analysis considerations. Data from a recent study that implemented an electronic diary for capturing real-time pain data are presented and reviewed in the context of the methodological factors reviewed above. It is concluded that methodological factors can greatly affect our understanding of patients' pain experiences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12849713     DOI: 10.1016/s1521-6942(03)00031-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 1521-6942            Impact factor:   4.098


  22 in total

1.  How Common Is Back Pain and What Biopsychosocial Factors Are Associated With Back Pain in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

Authors:  Arnold Y L Wong; Dino Samartzis; Prudence W H Cheung; Jason Pui Yin Cheung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Technology for behavioral assessment and intervention in bariatric surgery.

Authors:  J Graham Thomas; Dale S Bond; David B Sarwer; Rena R Wing
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 4.734

Review 3.  Improving the assessment of pediatric chronic pain: harnessing the potential of electronic diaries.

Authors:  Jennifer N Stinson
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.037

4.  Effect of a pain diary use on recovery from acute whiplash injury: a cohort study.

Authors:  Robert Ferrari; Deon Louw
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.066

5.  Public health surveillance of dental pain via Twitter.

Authors:  N Heaivilin; B Gerbert; J E Page; J L Gibbs
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  The validity of a patient-reported adverse drug event questionnaire using different recall periods.

Authors:  Sieta T de Vries; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp; Dick de Zeeuw; Petra Denig
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Situational versus dispositional measurement of catastrophizing: associations with pain responses in multiple samples.

Authors:  Claudia M Campbell; Tarek Kronfli; Luis F Buenaver; Michael T Smith; Chantal Berna; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Robert R Edwards
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.820

8.  A Functional Neuroimaging Study of Expectancy Effects on Pain Response in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Randy L Gollub; Irving Kirsch; Nasim Maleki; Ajay D Wasan; Robert R Edwards; Yiheng Tu; Ted J Kaptchuk; Jian Kong
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 9.  Assessment and management of pain in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Authors:  Jennifer N Stinson; Nadia J C Luca; Lindsay A Jibb
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.037

10.  Depression, pain intensity, and interference in acute spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Linton Cuff; Jesse R Fann; Charles H Bombardier; Daniel E Graves; Claire Z Kalpakjian
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2014
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.