Literature DB >> 12848726

Mechanism of quinolone resistance in anaerobic bacteria.

H Oh1, C Edlund.   

Abstract

Several recently developed quinolones have excellent activity against a broad range of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and are thus potential drugs for the treatment of serious anaerobic and mixed infections. Resistance to quinolones is increasing worldwide, but is still relatively infrequent among anaerobes. Two main mechanisms, alteration of target enzymes (gyrase and topoisomerase IV) caused by chromosomal mutations in encoding genes, or reduced intracellular accumulation due to increased efflux of the drug, are associated with quinolone resistance. These mechanisms have also been found in anaerobic species. High-level resistance to the newer broad-spectrum quinolones often requires stepwise mutations in target genes. The increasing emergence of resistance among anaerobes may be a consequence of previous widespread use of quinolones, which may have enriched first-step mutants in the intestinal tract. Quinolone resistance in the Bacteroides fragilis group strains is strongly correlated with amino acid substitutions at positions 82 and 86 in GyrA (equivalent to positions 83 and 87 of Escherichia coli). Several studies have indicated that B. fragilis group strains possess efflux pump systems that actively expel quinolones, leading to resistance. DNA gyrase seems also to be the primary target for quinolones in Clostridium difficile, since amino acid substitutions in GyrA and GyrB have been detected in resistant strains. To what extent other mechanisms, such as mutational events in other target genes or alterations in outer-membrane proteins, contribute to resistance among anaerobes needs to be further investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12848726     DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00725.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  7 in total

1.  Antianaerobic activity of a novel fluoroquinolone, WCK 771, compared to those of nine other agents.

Authors:  Mihaela Peric; Michael R Jacobs; Peter C Appelbaum
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Genetic determinant of intrinsic quinolone resistance in Fusobacterium canifelinum.

Authors:  Georg Conrads; Diane M Citron; Ellie J C Goldstein
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Anaerobic infections: update on treatment considerations.

Authors:  Elisabeth Nagy
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Effects of exposure of Clostridium difficile PCR ribotypes 027 and 001 to fluoroquinolones in a human gut model.

Authors:  Katie Saxton; Simon D Baines; Jane Freeman; Rachael O'Connor; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-08-18       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  A curated C. difficile strain 630 metabolic network: prediction of essential targets and inhibitors.

Authors:  Mathieu Larocque; Thierry Chénard; Rafael Najmanovich
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2014-10-15

Review 6.  Clostridium difficile Infections: A Global Overview of Drug Sensitivity and Resistance Mechanisms.

Authors:  Saeed S Banawas
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  A global to local genomics analysis of Clostridioides difficile ST1/RT027 identifies cryptic transmission events in a northern Arizona healthcare network.

Authors:  Charles H D Williamson; Nathan E Stone; Amalee E Nunnally; Heidie M Hornstra; David M Wagner; Chandler C Roe; Adam J Vazquez; Nivedita Nandurkar; Jacob Vinocur; Joel Terriquez; John Gillece; Jason Travis; Darrin Lemmer; Paul Keim; Jason W Sahl
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2019-05-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.