Literature DB >> 12846762

Effect of Kt/V on survival and clinical outcome in CAPD patients in a randomized prospective study.

Wai-Kei Lo1, Yiu-Wing Ho, Chun-Sang Li, Kin-Shing Wong, Tak-Mao Chan, Alex Wai-Yin Yu, Flora So-King Ng, Ignatius Kum-Po Cheng.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been a lack of randomized control study on the effect of Kt/V on patient outcome. This interventional study was designed to examine the effect of Kt/V on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients' clinical outcome and nutritional status in a randomized prospective manner.
METHOD: A total of 320 new CAPD patients with baseline renal Kt/V <1.0 were recruited from six centers in Hong Kong and were randomized into three Kt/V targets: group A, 1.5 to 1.7; group B, 1.7 to 2.0; and group C,>2.0. Kt/V and nutritional status were assessed every 6 months and dialysis prescription adjusted accordingly. Nutritional assessment included serum albumin and composite nutritional index (CNI). Patients were allowed to withdraw at the discretion of their physicians or themselves.
RESULTS: Total Kt/V were significantly different between groups (P = 0.000) and the difference was contributed by peritoneal Kt/V only. The overall 2-year patient survival was 84.9%. There was no statistical difference in patient survival among the three groups (2-year survival in group A, 87.3%; group B, 86.1%; and group C, 81.5%). However, there were more patients withdrawn by physicians in group A (group A, 16; group B, 7; and group C, 6; P = 0.023). Total Kt/V or Kt did not significantly affect survival after adjustment to age and diabetes. There was no difference in serum albumin, CNI scores, and hospitalization rate, but there were more patients in group A requiring erythropoietin (EPO) treatment after 1 year.
CONCLUSION: Patients with total Kt/V maintained below 1.7 had significantly more clinical problems and severe anemia but there was no difference in outcome demonstrated for patients with Kt/V maintained above 2.0 and between 1.7 and 2.0. We recommended that the minimal target of total Kt/V should be above 1.7.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12846762     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00098.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  46 in total

Review 1.  Nutrition in patients on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Seung-Hyeok Han; Dae-Suk Han
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 28.314

2.  Predicting Risk in Peritoneal Dialysis: Is Membrane Biology Destiny?

Authors:  Maria Erika Ramirez; Joanne Bargman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy in Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Elizabeth Oei; Stanley Fan
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Incremental start to PD as experienced in Italy: results of censuses carried out from 2005 to 2014.

Authors:  Loris Neri; Giusto Viglino; Giancarlo Marinangeli; Anna Rachele Rocca; Alessandro Laudon; Antonino Ragusa; Gianfranca Cabiddu
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 5.  The Use of a Multidimensional Measure of Dialysis Adequacy-Moving beyond Small Solute Kinetics.

Authors:  Jeffrey Perl; Laura M Dember; Joanne M Bargman; Teri Browne; David M Charytan; Jennifer E Flythe; LaTonya J Hickson; Adriana M Hung; Michel Jadoul; Timmy Chang Lee; Klemens B Meyer; Hamid Moradi; Tariq Shafi; Isaac Teitelbaum; Leslie P Wong; Christopher T Chan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Volume-Based Peritoneal Dialysis Prescription Guide to Achieve Adequacy Targets.

Authors:  Alp Akonur; Catherine A Firanek; Mary E Gellens; Audrey M Hutchcraft; Pranay Kathuria; James A Sloand
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Differences in survival on peritoneal dialysis between oriental Asians and Caucasians: one center's experience.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Effie Tziviskou; Maggie Chu; Joanne Bargman; Vanita Jassal; Stephen Vas; Dimitrios G Oreopoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 8.  Long-term outcome of chronic dialysis in children.

Authors:  Rukshana Shroff; Sarah Ledermann
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 9.  [Peritoneal dialysis from the beginnings up to today: which developments of the last decades were important?].

Authors:  Andreas Vychytil
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2013-04-17

10.  Design of the Blood Pressure Goals in Dialysis pilot study.

Authors:  Ambreen Gul; Dana Miskulin; Jennifer Gassman; Antonia Harford; Bruce Horowitz; Joline Chen; Susan Paine; Edward Bedrick; John W Kusek; Mark Unruh; Philip Zager
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.378

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.