OBJECTIVE: Because birth weight has been positively associated with adult life breast cancer risk and pregnancy estrogens have been hypothesized to affect breast cancer risk in the offspring, we have evaluated the association of pregnancy estriol (E3), estradiol (E2), progesterone and prolactin in maternal serum samples collected during the 16th and 27th gestational week with birth size parameters. METHODS: Prospective study of 230 Caucasian women who delivered a live singleton after 37-42 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: E3 at the 27th gestational week was significantly positively associated with birth weight, birth length and placental weight. Progesterone at the 27th gestational week was also significantly positively associated with birth weight and placental weight but, after mutual adjustment among the studied pregnancy hormones, these associations weakened considerably. There was also inconsistent evidence that SHBG and prolactin at the 27th gestational week may be respectively positively and inversely related with birth size parameters. Measurements during the 16th gestational week were generally unrelated to birth size parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Because E3 is a dominant estrogen during pregnancy, the positive association of it with birth weight allows the use of the latter as a proxy of in utero exposure to estrogens in breast cancer investigations.
OBJECTIVE: Because birth weight has been positively associated with adult life breast cancer risk and pregnancy estrogens have been hypothesized to affect breast cancer risk in the offspring, we have evaluated the association of pregnancy estriol (E3), estradiol (E2), progesterone and prolactin in maternal serum samples collected during the 16th and 27th gestational week with birth size parameters. METHODS: Prospective study of 230 Caucasian women who delivered a live singleton after 37-42 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: E3 at the 27th gestational week was significantly positively associated with birth weight, birth length and placental weight. Progesterone at the 27th gestational week was also significantly positively associated with birth weight and placental weight but, after mutual adjustment among the studied pregnancy hormones, these associations weakened considerably. There was also inconsistent evidence that SHBG and prolactin at the 27th gestational week may be respectively positively and inversely related with birth size parameters. Measurements during the 16th gestational week were generally unrelated to birth size parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Because E3 is a dominant estrogen during pregnancy, the positive association of it with birth weight allows the use of the latter as a proxy of in utero exposure to estrogens in breast cancer investigations.
Authors: E T Jensen; J L Daniels; T Stürmer; W R Robinson; C J Williams; D Moster; P B Juliusson; K Vejrup; P Magnus; M P Longnecker Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Yawei Zhang; Barry I Graubard; Matthew P Longnecker; Frank Z Stanczyk; Mark A Klebanoff; Katherine A McGlynn Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2006-08-01 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Lauren E Barber; Kimberly A Bertrand; Lynn Rosenberg; Tracy A Battaglia; Julie R Palmer Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Angela M Bengtson; Carla J Chibwesha; Daniel Westreich; Mwangelwa Mubiana-Mbewe; Bellington Vwalika; William C Miller; Muntanga Mapani; Patrick Musonda; Audrey Pettifor; Benjamin H Chi Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Sven Cnattingius; Sandra Eloranta; Hans-Olov Adami; Ove Axelsson; Paul W Dickman; Chung-cheng Hsieh; Lorelei A Mucci; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Mats Lambe; Anna L V Johansson Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Lorelei A Mucci; Paul W Dickman; Mats Lambe; Hans-Olov Adami; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Tomas Riman; Chung-Cheng Hsieh; Sven Cnattingius Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Marie Lof; Leena Hilakivi-Clarke; Sven Sandin S; Sonia de Assis; Wei Yu; Elisabete Weiderpass Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2009-04-30 Impact factor: 2.809