Literature DB >> 12843735

Internal fixation versus arthroplasty of comminuted fractures of the distal humerus.

William T Obremskey1, Mohit Bhandari, Douglas R Dirschl, Emil Shemitsch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A comminuted distal humerus fracture in an older patient is a difficult clinical problem. Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) carries the risks of nonunion, loss of fixation, infection, and stiffness. Arthroplasty carries the risks of loosening, infection, and periprosthetic fracture. Both procedures are technically challenging, and complications following these procedures are frequent.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate best available evidence to assist in guiding clinical decision making for ORIF versus arthroplasty of intraarticular distal humeral fractures in elderly patients. HIGHEST AVAILABLE EVIDENCE: 1. Case series of internal fixation or arthroplasty of acute interarticular distal humerus fractures in the elderly (level IV). 2. Review of expert opinion without explicit critical appraisal or controlled research (level V). STUDY IDENTIFICATION: 1. Computerized data search 1969-2003, Cochrane Database, OVID Search Engine. 2. Reviews of bibliographies of selected articles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12843735     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200307000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  11 in total

1.  Trends in total elbow arthroplasty: a nationwide analysis in Germany from 2005 to 2014.

Authors:  Alexander Klug; Yves Gramlich; Johannes Buckup; Uwe Schweigkofler; Reinhard Hoffmann; Kay Schmidt-Horlohé
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly. Pros and cons of endoprosthetic replacement].

Authors:  S-O Dietz; T E Nowak; K J Burkhart; L P Müller; P M Rommens
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  The clinical outcome and activity levels of patients under 55 years treated with distal humeral hemiarthroplasty for distal humeral fractures: minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Geoffrey C S Smith; Grant Bayne; Richard Page; Jeff S Hughes
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-07-18

4.  Arthroplasty compared to internal fixation by locking plate osteosynthesis in comminuted fractures of the distal humerus.

Authors:  Alexander Ellwein; Helmut Lill; Christine Voigt; Pauline Wirtz; Gunnar Jensen; Jan Christoph Katthagen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Osteochondral allograft transplantation for complex distal humeral fractures assisted by 3D computer planning and printing technology: technical note.

Authors:  Raffaele Russo; Antonio Guastafierro; Giuseppe Della Rotonda; Stefano Viglione; Michele Ciccarelli; Fabrizio Fiorentino; Paolo Minopoli; Marco Mortellaro; Livia Renata Pietroluongo; Francesco Langella
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-09-15

6.  Infection in fracture fixation: can we influence infection rates through implant design?

Authors:  T Fintan Moriarty; U Schlegel; S Perren; R Geoff Richards
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Contributing risk factors for orthopedic device related infections in sina hospital, tehran, iran.

Authors:  A Hadadi; M J Zehtab; H Babagolzadeh; H Ashraf
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 0.611

Review 8.  Antimicrobial agents in orthopaedic surgery: Prophylaxis and treatment.

Authors:  Andrej Trampuz; Werner Zimmerli
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.431

9.  Comparison of open reduction and internal fixation with total elbow arthroplasty for intra-articular distal humeral fractures in older age: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jong Seok Baik; Sung Hyun Lee; Hyun Tak Kang; Tae Hyun Song; Jeong Woo Kim
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2020-05-26

10.  Primary total elbow arthroplasty.

Authors:  Suresh Kumar; Sunayan Mahanta
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.