Literature DB >> 12842542

Video-assisted mediastinoscopy: experience from 240 consecutive cases.

Nicolas Venissac1, Marco Alifano, Jèrôme Mouroux.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We report our experience with video-assisted mediastinoscopy.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of all patients who underwent video-assisted mediastinoscopy in a 26-month period. Video-assisted mediastinoscopy was performed in the presence of enlarged lymph nodes (short axis > 1 cm) found at computed tomography scan. Data about operative time, node stations sampled, number of biopsies, and operative complications were collected. Results of the pathologic examination were recorded, as well as (when different) the definitive diagnosis.
RESULTS: Video-assisted mediastinoscopy was performed in 240 consecutive patients. In 2 patients, the technique was employed for resection of a mesothelial cyst. In the other cases, it was used for diagnosis of enlarged nodes or staging of lung cancer. Mean number of biopsies was 6.0; mean number of sampled nodal stations was 2.3. Mean operative time was 36.6 minutes. Two operative complications occurred: a pneumothorax not requiring drainage and an injury to the innominate artery requiring manubrial split and suture. In 192 patients, the definitive diagnosis was lung cancer (18 small-cell lung cancers). In the remaining 46 patients, video-assisted mediastinoscopy allowed establishment of the diagnosis (sarcoidosis, n = 22; reactive hyperplastic lympho-adenitis, n = 13; tuberculosis, n = 4; involvement by malignancies other than lung cancer, n = 7). Among the 174 patients with non-small cell lung cancer, mediastinal nodal involvement was recognized in 107 cases (N3, n = 28; N2, n = 79). Sixty-seven patients were staged N less than 2; 47 underwent thoracotomy. Postthoracotomy staging agreed with video-assisted mediastinoscopy staging in 44 cases (93.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: Video-assisted mediastinoscopy proved to be safe and effective in nodal assessment of the mediastinum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12842542     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00164-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  17 in total

Review 1.  Does video-assisted mediastinoscopy have a better lymph node yield and safety profile than conventional mediastinoscopy?

Authors:  Miriam Adebibe; Omar A Jarral; Alex R Shipolini; David J McCormack
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-12-02

2.  Evolution and science, progress and change.

Authors:  Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 3.  [Video-assisted mediastinoscopic surgery].

Authors:  B Witte; M Hürtgen
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Anatomical bases of left recurrent nerve lesions during mediastinoscopy.

Authors:  Vincent Benouaich; Bertrand Marcheix; Luana Carfagna; Laurent Brouchet; Jacques Guitard
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Video-assisted mediastinoscopy as a therapeutic tool.

Authors:  Nicolas Venissac; Daniel Pop; Jérôme Mouroux
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Perioperative analysis of biopsies issued from mediastinoscopy.

Authors:  M Alifano; M C Charpentier; C Perrotin; T J Molina; P Magdeleinat; J Audouin; J-F Regnard; S Camilleri-Broët
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Learning mediastinoscopy: the need for education, experience and modern techniques--interdependency of the applied technique and surgeon's training level.

Authors:  Thorsten Walles; Godehard Friedel; Tobias Stegherr; Volker Steger
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-12-18

Review 8.  Comparison of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Video-Assisted Mediastinoscopy for Mediastinal Staging of Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Xiahui Ge; Wenbin Guan; Fengfeng Han; Xuejun Guo; Zhichao Jin
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 9.  Is video mediastinoscopy a safer and more effective procedure than conventional mediastinoscopy?

Authors:  Mustafa Zakkar; Carol Tan; Ian Hunt
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-11-17

10.  Mediastinoscopy: trends and practice patterns in the United States.

Authors:  Krishna S Vyas; Daniel L Davenport; Victor A Ferraris; Sibu P Saha
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.954

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.