Literature DB >> 12842048

Structural basis for ligand binding and processivity in cellobiohydrolase Cel6A from Humicola insolens.

Annabelle Varrot1, Torben P Frandsen, Ingemar von Ossowski, Viviane Boyer, Sylvain Cottaz, Hugues Driguez, Martin Schülein, Gideon J Davies.   

Abstract

The enzymatic digestion of cellulose entails intimate involvement of cellobiohydrolases, whose characteristic active-center tunnel contributes to a processive degradation of the polysaccharide. The cellobiohydrolase Cel6A displays an active site within a tunnel formed by two extended loops, which are known to open and close in response to ligand binding. Here we present five structures of wild-type and mutant forms of Cel6A from Humicola insolens in complex with nonhydrolyzable thio-oligosaccharides, at resolutions from 1.7-1.1 A, dissecting the structural accommodation of a processing substrate chain through the active center during hydrolysis. Movement of ligand is facilitated by extensive solvent-mediated interactions and through flexibility in the hydrophobic surfaces provided by a sheath of tryptophan residues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12842048     DOI: 10.1016/s0969-2126(03)00124-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Structure        ISSN: 0969-2126            Impact factor:   5.006


  35 in total

1.  Nonplanar peptide bonds in proteins are common and conserved but not biased toward active sites.

Authors:  Donald S Berkholz; Camden M Driggers; Maxim V Shapovalov; Roland L Dunbrack; P Andrew Karplus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Product binding varies dramatically between processive and nonprocessive cellulase enzymes.

Authors:  Lintao Bu; Mark R Nimlos; Michael R Shirts; Jerry Ståhlberg; Michael E Himmel; Michael F Crowley; Gregg T Beckham
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Processivity of cellobiohydrolases is limited by the substrate.

Authors:  Mihhail Kurasin; Priit Väljamäe
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Costs and benefits of processivity in enzymatic degradation of recalcitrant polysaccharides.

Authors:  Svein J Horn; Pawel Sikorski; Jannicke B Cederkvist; Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad; Morten Sørlie; Bjørnar Synstad; Gert Vriend; Kjell M Vårum; Vincent G H Eijsink
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Modelling of carbohydrate-aromatic interactions: ab initio energetics and force field performance.

Authors:  Vojtech Spiwok; Petra Lipovová; Tereza Skálová; Eva Vondrácková; Jan Dohnálek; Jindrich Hasek; Blanka Králová
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Substrate selectivity in starch polysaccharide monooxygenases.

Authors:  Van V Vu; John A Hangasky; Tyler C Detomasi; Skylar J W Henry; Son Tung Ngo; Elise A Span; Michael A Marletta
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Aromatic residues in the catalytic center of chitinase A from Serratia marcescens affect processivity, enzyme activity, and biomass converting efficiency.

Authors:  Henrik Zakariassen; Berit Bjugan Aam; Svein J Horn; Kjell M Vårum; Morten Sørlie; Vincent G H Eijsink
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  A kinetic model for the enzymatic action of cellulase.

Authors:  Christina L Ting; Dmitrii E Makarov; Zhen-Gang Wang
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  The three-dimensional structure of the cellobiohydrolase Cel7A from Aspergillus fumigatus at 1.5 Å resolution.

Authors:  Olga V Moroz; Michelle Maranta; Tarana Shaghasi; Paul V Harris; Keith S Wilson; Gideon J Davies
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.056

10.  Cellulase processivity.

Authors:  David B Wilson; Maxim Kostylev
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.