Literature DB >> 12839207

Use of an inclinometer to measure flexibility of the iliotibial band using the Ober test and the modified Ober test: differences in magnitude and reliability of measurements.

Nancy B Reese1, William D Bandy.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Test-retest design to evaluate the reliability of the measurement of iliotibial (IT) band flexibility using an inclinometer to measure the hip adduction angle.
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine the intrarater reliability of the Ober test and the modified Ober test for the assessment of IT band flexibility using an inclinometer to measure the hip adduction angle. A secondary objective was to determine if a difference existed between the measurements of IT band flexibility between the Ober and modified Ober test.
BACKGROUND: The Ober test and the modified Ober test are frequently used for the measurement of IT band flexibility. To date, data documenting the objective measurement of flexibility of the IT band is scarce in the literature. METHODS AND MEASURES: Sixty-one subjects, with a mean age of 24.2 (SD = 4.3) years, were measured during 2 measurement sessions over 2 consecutive days. During each measurement session, subjects were positioned on their left side and, with an inclinometer at the lateral epicondyle of the femur, hip adduction was measured during the Ober test (knee at 90 degrees of flexion) and the modified Ober test (knee extended). If the limb was horizontal, it was considered to be at 0 degrees, if below horizontal (adducted), it was recorded as a positive number, and if above horizontal (abducted), it was recorded as a negative number.
RESULTS: The ICC values calculated for the intrarater reliability of the repeated measurement were 0.90 for the Ober test and 0.91 for the modified Ober test. Results of the dependent t test indicated a significantly greater range of motion of the hip in adduction using the modified Ober test as compared to the Ober test. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: The use of an inclinometer to measure hip adduction using both the Ober test and the modified Ober test appears to be a reliable method for the measurement of IT band flexibility, and the technique is quite easy to use. However, given that the modified Ober test allows significantly greater hip adduction range of motion than the Ober test, the 2 examination procedures should not be used interchangeably for the measurement of the flexibility of the IT band.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12839207     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2003.33.6.326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  17 in total

1.  Assessment of strength, flexibility, and running mechanics in men with iliotibial band syndrome.

Authors:  Brian Noehren; Anne Schmitz; Ross Hempel; Carolyn Westlake; William Black
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.751

2.  Influence of Hamstring and Abdominal Muscle Activation on a Positive Ober's Test in People with Lumbopelvic Pain.

Authors:  H Rich Tenney; Kyndall L Boyle; Aaron Debord
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  Normative and critical criteria for iliotibial band and iliopsoas muscle flexibility.

Authors:  Reed Ferber; Karen D Kendall; Lindsay McElroy
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Comparison of twice refocused spin echo versus stimulated echo diffusion tensor imaging for tracking muscle fibers.

Authors:  Brian Noehren; Anders Andersen; Thorsten Feiweier; Bruce Damon; Peter Hardy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  The use of trigger point dry needling and intramuscular electrical stimulation for a subject with chronic low back pain: a case report.

Authors:  Charles E Rainey
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-04

6.  Treatment Success of Hip and Core or Knee Strengthening for Patellofemoral Pain: Development of Clinical Prediction Rules.

Authors:  Jennifer E Earl-Boehm; Lori A Bolgla; Carolyn Emory; Karrie L Hamstra-Wright; Sergey Tarima; Reed Ferber
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  THE EFFECTS OF AN AQUATIC MANUAL THERAPY TECHNIQUE, AQUASTRETCH™ ON RECREATIONAL ATHLETES WITH LOWER EXTREMITY INJURIES.

Authors:  Timothy Alejo; Corey Shilhanek; Michael McGrath; John D Heick
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-04

8.  Patellofemoral pain syndrome and modifiable intrinsic risk factors; how to assess and address?

Authors:  Farzin Halabchi; Reza Mazaheri; Tohid Seif-Barghi
Journal:  Asian J Sports Med       Date:  2013-02-12

9.  THE EFFECTS OF AN ACUTE BOUT OF FOAM ROLLING ON HIP RANGE OF MOTION ON DIFFERENT TISSUES.

Authors:  MacGregor Hall; J Chadwick Smith
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-08

10.  The Immediate Effects of Foam Rolling and Stretching on Iliotibial Band Stiffness: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Talin M Pepper; Jean-Michel Brismée; Phillip S Sizer; Jeegisha Kapila; Gesine H Seeber; Christopher A Huggins; Troy L Hooper
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2021-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.