Jennifer E Earl-Boehm1, Lori A Bolgla2, Carolyn Emory3, Karrie L Hamstra-Wright4, Sergey Tarima5, Reed Ferber3. 1. Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. 2. Department of Physical Therapy, Augusta University, GA. 3. Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 4. North Park University, Chicago, IL. 5. Department of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a common injury that interferes with quality of life and physical activity. Clinical subgroups of patients may exist, one of which is caused by proximal muscle dysfunction. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical prediction rules that predict a positive outcome after either a hip and core- or knee-focused strengthening program for individuals with PFP. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from a randomized control trial. SETTING: Four university laboratories. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 199 participants with PFP. INTERVENTION(S): Participants were randomly allocated to either a hip and core-focused (n = 111) or knee-focused (n = 88) rehabilitation group for a 6-week program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Demographics, self-reported knee pain (visual analog scale) and function (Anterior Knee Pain Scale), hip strength, abdominal muscle endurance, and hip range of motion were evaluated at baseline. Treatment success was defined as a decrease in visual analog scale score by ≥2 cm or an increase in the Anterior Knee Pain Scale score by ≥8 points or both. Bivariate relationships between the outcome (treatment success) and the predictor variables were explored, followed by a forward stepwise logistic regression to predict a successful outcome. RESULTS: Patients with more pain, better function, greater lateral core endurance, and less anterior core endurance were more likely to have a successful outcome after hip and core strengthening (88% sensitivity and 54% specificity). Patients with lower weight, weaker hip internal rotation, stronger hip extension, and greater trunk-extension endurance were more likely to have success after knee strengthening (82% sensitivity and 58% specificity). CONCLUSION: The patients with PFP who have more baseline pain and yet maintain a high level of function may experience additional benefit from hip and core strengthening. The clinical prediction rules from this study remain in the developmental phase and should be applied with caution until externally validated.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a common injury that interferes with quality of life and physical activity. Clinical subgroups of patients may exist, one of which is caused by proximal muscle dysfunction. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical prediction rules that predict a positive outcome after either a hip and core- or knee-focused strengthening program for individuals with PFP. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from a randomized control trial. SETTING: Four university laboratories. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 199 participants with PFP. INTERVENTION(S): Participants were randomly allocated to either a hip and core-focused (n = 111) or knee-focused (n = 88) rehabilitation group for a 6-week program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Demographics, self-reported knee pain (visual analog scale) and function (Anterior Knee Pain Scale), hip strength, abdominal muscle endurance, and hip range of motion were evaluated at baseline. Treatment success was defined as a decrease in visual analog scale score by ≥2 cm or an increase in the Anterior Knee Pain Scale score by ≥8 points or both. Bivariate relationships between the outcome (treatment success) and the predictor variables were explored, followed by a forward stepwise logistic regression to predict a successful outcome. RESULTS:Patients with more pain, better function, greater lateral core endurance, and less anterior core endurance were more likely to have a successful outcome after hip and core strengthening (88% sensitivity and 54% specificity). Patients with lower weight, weaker hip internal rotation, stronger hip extension, and greater trunk-extension endurance were more likely to have success after knee strengthening (82% sensitivity and 58% specificity). CONCLUSION: The patients with PFP who have more baseline pain and yet maintain a high level of function may experience additional benefit from hip and core strengthening. The clinical prediction rules from this study remain in the developmental phase and should be applied with caution until externally validated.
Authors: Erik Witvrouw; Michael J Callaghan; Joshua J Stefanik; Brian Noehren; David M Bazett-Jones; John D Willson; Jennifer E Earl-Boehm; Irene S Davis; Christopher M Powers; Jenny McConnell; Kay M Crossley Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Michael S Rathleff; Ewa M Roos; Jens L Olesen; Sten Rasmussen; Lars Arendt-Nielsen Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2013-03-18 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Natalie J Collins; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Kay M Crossley; Robbart L van Linschoten; Bill Vicenzino; Marienke van Middelkoop Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Henri Taanila; Jaana Suni; Harri Pihlajamäki; Ville M Mattila; Olli Ohrankämmen; Petteri Vuorinen; Jari Parkkari Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2009-07-22 Impact factor: 2.362