Literature DB >> 12838555

Life insurance and breast cancer risk assessment: adverse selection, genetic testing decisions, and discrimination.

Katrina Armstrong1, Barbara Weber, Genevieve FitzGerald, John C Hershey, Mark V Pauly, Jean Lemaire, Krupa Subramanian, David A Asch.   

Abstract

Life insurance industry access to genetic information is controversial. Consumer groups argue that access will increase discrimination in life insurance premiums and discourage individuals from undergoing genetic testing that may provide health benefits. Conversely, life insurers argue that without access to risk information available to individuals, they face substantial financial risk from adverse selection. Given this controversy, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the impact of breast cancer risk information on life insurance purchasing, the impact of concerns about life insurance discrimination on use of BRCA1/2 testing, and the incidence of life insurance discrimination following participation in breast cancer risk assessment and BRCA1/2 testing. Study participants were 636 women who participated in genetic counseling and/or genetic testing at a University based clinic offering breast cancer risk assessment, genetic counseling, and BRCA1/2 testing between January 1995 and May 2000. Twenty-seven women (4%) had increased and six (1%) had decreased their life insurance since participation in breast cancer risk assessment. The decision to increase life insurance coverage was associated with predicted breast cancer risk (adjusted OR 1.03 for each 1% absolute increase in risk, 95% CI 1.01-1.10) and being found to carry a mutation in BRCA1/2 (OR 5.10, 95% CI 1.90-13.66). Concern about life insurance discrimination was inversely associated with the decision to undergo BRCA1/2 testing (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.85). No respondent reported having life insurance denied or canceled. In this cohort of women, these results indicate that information about increased breast cancer risk is associated with increase in life insurance purchasing, raising the possibility of adverse selection. Although fear of insurance discrimination is associated with the decision not to undergo BRCA1/2 testing, there was no evidence of actual insurance discrimination from BRCA1/2 testing. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12838555     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  18 in total

Review 1.  Global trends on fears and concerns of genetic discrimination: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Annet Wauters; Ine Van Hoyweghen
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.172

2.  A model to decompose the performance of supplementary private health insurance markets.

Authors:  Reiner Leidl
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2008-06-22

Review 3.  Ethical considerations in genomic testing for hematologic disorders.

Authors:  Jonathan M Marron; Steven Joffe
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Pediatric Whole Exome Sequencing: an Assessment of Parents' Perceived and Actual Understanding.

Authors:  Leandra K Tolusso; Kathleen Collins; Xue Zhang; Jennifer R Holle; C Alexander Valencia; Melanie F Myers
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Why Patients Decline Genomic Sequencing Studies: Experiences from the CSER Consortium.

Authors:  Laura M Amendola; Jill O Robinson; Ragan Hart; Sawona Biswas; Kaitlyn Lee; Barbara A Bernhardt; Kelly East; Marian J Gilmore; Tia L Kauffman; Katie L Lewis; Myra Roche; Sarah Scollon; Julia Wynn; Carrie Blout
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Hereditary breast cancer in Jews.

Authors:  Wendy S Rubinstein
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease and its impact on insurance purchasing behavior.

Authors:  Cathleen D Zick; Charles J Mathews; J Scott Roberts; Robert Cook-Deegan; Robert J Pokorski; Robert C Green
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Engagement with genetic discrimination: concerns and experiences in the context of Huntington disease.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Elizabeth Penziner; Oksana Suchowersky; Mark Guttman; Jane S Paulsen; Joan L Bottorff; Michael R Hayden
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Physicians' experiences with BRCA1/2 testing in community settings.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Kathryn A Stoeckert; Meredith M Regan; Lisa DiGianni; Judy E Garber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Colorectal cancer in the family: psychosocial distress and social issues in the years following genetic counselling.

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Fred H Menko; Irma Kluijt; Babs G Taal; Miranda A Gerritsma; Lidwina D V Wever; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.