Literature DB >> 12838296

First-line sequential high-dose VIP chemotherapy with autologous transplantation for patients with primary mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumours: a prospective trial.

C Bokemeyer1, N Schleucher, B Metzner, M Thomas, O Rick, H-J Schmoll, C Kollmannsberger, I Boehlke, L Kanz, J T Hartmann.   

Abstract

To determine the efficacy of first-line sequential high-dose VIP chemotherapy (HD-VIP) in patients with primary mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (GCT), 28 patients were enrolled on a German multicentre trial. High-Dose VIP chemotherapy consisted of 3-4 cycles of dose-intensive etoposide and ifosfamide plus cisplatin, q22days, each cycle followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. One cycle of standard-dose VIP was applied to harvest peripheral blood stem cells. Ten patients had mediastinal involvement as the only manifestation (36 %), 18 of 28 patients had additional metastatic sites, such as lung (n=17; 61%), liver (n=7; 25%), bone (n=5; 18%), lymph nodes (n=3; 11%) and CNS (n=3; 11%). Median follow-up was 43 months (range, 7-113) for all patients and 52 months (range, 22-113) for surviving patients. Nineteen of 28 patients obtained a disease-free status; 11 with HD-VIP alone and eight with adjunctive surgery. In addition, one of the four patients with marker negative partial remission after HD-VIP without resection of residual masses is currently alive. Two patients developed recurrence of GCT or teratoma. Two patients have died due to an associated haematologic disorder. The 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates are 64 and 68%, respectively. This report represents a subgroup analysis of 28 patients with mediastinal nonsemina within the German first-line study for 'poor prognosis' GCT. Compared to data of an international database analysis including 253 patients with mediastinal nonseminoma treated with conventional chemotherapy, the results may indicate that HD-VIP results in an approximately 15% survival improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12838296      PMCID: PMC2394224          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Testicular germ cell cancer is the most common malignancy in men aged between 15 and 35 years (Hartmann , Bosl and Motzer, 1997). An important subset of germ cell tumours (GCT), approximately 5–7%, is of extragonadal origin (Collins and Pugh, 1964). In adults, these tumours most commonly arise in the midline of the body, particularly in the retroperitoneum and the mediastinum. Conventional cisplatin-based chemotherapy has demonstrated activity in patients with extragonadal GCT, and long-term survival rates approach those of patients with advanced-stage metastatic gonadal GCT (Nichols , Hidalgo ). Primary nonseminomatous tumours of the mediastinum have a poor outcome with conventional chemotherapy and the presence of a mediastinal location defines the patient as ‘poor prognosis’ according to the IGCCCG classification irrespective of additional metastatic sites or elevated tumour marker concentrations (Ulbright ; Toner ; Bukowski ; Childs ; Harding ; Saxman ; Hidalgo ; International Germ Cell Consensus Classification, 1997; Ganjoo ). High-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (HD-CT) is used as a therapeutic option with acceptable toxicity in patients with relapsed GCT, and has also been investigated as first-line therapy in patients fulfilling ‘intermediate’ or ‘poor prognosis’ criteria according to the IGCCCG classification (Motzer ,1997; Bokemeyer ). A retrospective matched-pair analysis demonstrated that first-line HD-CT is associated with a potential survival benefit of approximately 15% at 2 years in ‘poor prognosis’ patients compared to standard-dose cisplatin-based chemotherapy (Bokemeyer ). This report summarises our experience with HD-CT in patients with mediastinal nonseminomatous GCT. Those patients were included into a German multicentre trial using HD-VIP regimen as first-line treatment in patients fulfilling either ‘advanced disease’ criteria according to the Indiana classification or IGCCCG ‘poor prognosis’ criteria since its introduction in 1995 (Birch ; International Germ Cell Consensus Classification, 1997).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1993 to July 1998, 28 patients with primary mediastinal nonseminomatous GCT were treated with sequential first-line HD-VIP chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation within a German prospective, multicentre trial. Eligibility criteria included nonseminomatous histology, any primary site, ‘advanced disease’ according to the Indiana University Criteria (Birch ) or ‘poor prognosis’ according to the IGCCCG (International Germ Cell Consensus Classification, 1997), adequate kidney function (creatinine clearance >60 ml min−1) and liver function (bilirubin <1.5-fold upper normal limit, liver enzymes
Figure 1

Design of sequential HD-VIP with PBSCT. SD=standard dose; HD=high dose; G-CSF=granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor; PBSC(T)=autologous peripheral blood stem cell (transplantation). *Five patients received a 4th HD-VIP cycle because of declining, but not completely normalised, tumour maker concentrations.

Design of sequential HD-VIP with PBSCT. SD=standard dose; HD=high dose; G-CSF=granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor; PBSC(T)=autologous peripheral blood stem cell (transplantation). *Five patients received a 4th HD-VIP cycle because of declining, but not completely normalised, tumour maker concentrations. A CR was defined as the complete disappearance of all clinical, radiological and biochemical evidence of disease after chemotherapy. Marker negative partial remission (PRm-) was assumed in patients with any decrease in the sum of the products of diameters of measurable lesions and normalisation of tumour markers. Progressive disease (PD) was defined as either residual lesions increasing in size or occurrence of new lesions and/or elevation of tumour markers at repeated controls.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (SPSS for Windows 10.0. software SPPS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). For all living patients, the status as of January 2002 was obtained. The overall survival (OS) calculation used death due to any reason as the end point. Various patients' characteristics such as, categorial variables, extent of disease at diagnosis, evidence of bone, lung, liver, brain, lymph node involvement, age grouping or tumour marker grouping (according to the IGCCCG classification) were investigated as potential prognostic factors by univariate analysis. For the survival time, the proportion of survivors was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method (Kaplan and Meier, 1958), and the log-rank test was used for comparison. For ordered categorial variables, the log-rank test for trends was used. All factors with a P-value <0.05 were considered as significant. All reported P-values were two-sided. The survival data of patients with high-dose chemotherapy have been compared with the cohort of patients receiving cisplatin-based conventional dose chemotherapy available from the International Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumour Study Group, which comprised individual treatment data on 635 patients with extragonadal GCT from 11 European and US cancer centres (Bokemeyer ; Hartmann ). A small proportion of patients with conventional dose chemotherapy received double-dose cisplatin, which had no impact on efficacy in a randomised, prospective intergroup study (Nichols ).

RESULTS

Patients' characteristics

Twenty-eight patients with primary mediastinal nonseminomatous GCT were treated within the HD-VIP protocol from 1993 to 1998. The median age was 32 years (range, 20–50). A detailed list of the patients' characteristics is given in Table 1. Due to the presence of the primary mediastinal GCT, all patients were classified as ‘poor prognosis’ testicular germ cell cancer according to the IGCCCG classification. Even without considering the primary tumour site, 18 patients (64%) fulfilled ‘poor prognosis’ criteria either because of the additional presence of visceral metastases or ‘poor marker’ status. Serum concentrations of the tumour markers α-fetoprotein, β-human chorionic gonadotropin and lactate dehydrogenase were elevated in 61, 36 and 43% of the 28 patients, respectively. Ten patients had localized disease confined to the mediastinum (36%), seven (25%) had additional thoracic involvement and 11 patients (39%) had evidence of visceral disease.
Table 1

Characteristics of 28 patients with nonseminomatous mediastinal GCT

CharacteristicsNo. of pts%
Median age – years (range)32 (20–50)
Histology  
 Nonseminomatous GCTa28b100
 Teratocarcinoma414
 Endodermal sinus tumour829
 Choriocarcinoma829
 Embryonal Cell14
 Serologic diagnosis onlyc14
 other GCT histology621
Elevated serum tumour markers
α-fetoprotein1761
 Median (range) in ng ml−1912 (1 to 31.114) 
 Human chorionic gonadotropin1036
 Median (range) in mIU ml−134 (0.9 to 300.000) 
 Lactate dehydrogenase1243
 Median (range) in IU l−1360 (113 to 2.682) 
Extent of disease
 Localised mediastinal mass1032
 Additional lung/pleural involvement725
 Visceral metastases1139
Sites of metastases
 Bone518
 Lung1761
 Liver725
 CNS311
 LN311
 Other518
Previous chemotherapy

GCT=germ cell tumour;

A total of 12 of 28 patients have been included in Bokemeyer et al (1998);

Patient had a mediastinal mass without histologic diagnosis of the tumour and elevation of tumour marker concentrations β-HCG and/or AFP indicating a mediastinal nonseminomatous GCT.

GCT=germ cell tumour; A total of 12 of 28 patients have been included in Bokemeyer et al (1998); Patient had a mediastinal mass without histologic diagnosis of the tumour and elevation of tumour marker concentrations β-HCG and/or AFP indicating a mediastinal nonseminomatous GCT.

Treatment side effects

A total of 89 high-dose cycles with a median number of 3 (range, 3–4) per patient were given to the 28 patients with mediastinal primary tumours resulting in a median duration of WHO grade IV granulo- and thrombocytopenia of 6 and 4 days. Median time to haematologic recovery from the start of treatment was at days 15 and 16, respectively. WHO grade III/IV mucositis/enteritis occurred in nine (32%) patients. Nine (32%) patients developed grade III/IV fever/infection. No toxic death occurred. Chemotherapy-related neurotoxicity grade I/II was observed in five (18%) patients.

Response to treatment

Median follow-up duration was 43 months (range, 7–113) for all patients and 52 months (range, 22–113) for surviving patients. Follow-up data and response evaluation are summarised in Table 2. Nineteen of 28 patients (68%) obtained a disease-free status after treatment. Of the 19 patients with no evidence of disease after treatment, 16 are continuously in CR and in addition, one of four patients with PRm- after HD-VIP is currently alive. Two patients have relapsed from CR with recurrent GCT (n=1) and teratoma (n=1). Relapses occurred after 32 and 43 months after treatment. The patient who had developed teratoma remained alive and disease free 37 months after mediastinal resection and atypical right upper lobectomy. Three of four patients relapsed after achievement of a marker normalised PR at 2, 5 and 10 months after completion of chemotherapy. Two patients developed haematologic disorders, one an acute myelogenous leukaemia and the other a myelodysplasia with abnormal megakaryocytes, 12 and 18 months after initial therapy. Both died shortly after the occurrence of the haematologic disorder. Patients, who did not attain a CR to HD-VIP, received different second-line chemotherapy regimens including VeIP (Loehrer ) Loehrer et al, 2001 not cited in ref. List, TIP (Rick ), continuation of standard VIP and oral etoposide; however, none of the patients responded to salvage treatment. Neither the median progression-free survival (PFS) nor the median OS has been reached. The estimated 2- and 5-year PFS rates are 64% (95 % CI, 47–82%) and 56% (95% CI, 37–75%), and the estimated OS rates are 68% (95% CI, 51–85%) at 2 years and 64% (95% CI, 46–82%) at 5 years.
Table 2

Response to treatment and current follow-up status

 No. of pts%
Response to treatmenta
 CR/NEDnecrosis11 (4b/7)39 (14/25)
 NEDvital tumour7c25
 NEDteratoma14
 PRm−414
 PD518
Follow-up status
 NED17d61
 Continuously NED1657
 PR (>1 year)14
 DoD829
 Dead due to haematologic disorder2e7
Estimated OS%CI95%
 At 2 years6851–85
 At 5 years6446–82
Estimated PFS
 At 2 years6447–82
 At 5 years5637–75

Evaluation of response based on CT scans and determination of serum tumour marker concentrations.

Including one patient with consolidation CNS radiation for CNS metastases.

One patient with non-germ cell tumour elements.

One patient after resection of mature teratoma at relapse.

One patient with simultaneous relapse of GCT (after achievement of PRm−) and development of haematologic disorder (myelodysplasia with abnormal megakaryocyctes).

CR=complete remission after chemotherapy alone; NEDvital tumour/teratoma/necrosis=no evidence of disease after complete resection of vital tumour or differentiated teratoma; PR=partial remission; PD=Progressive disease; DoD=dead of disease; CI=confidence interval; OS=overall survival; PFS=progression-free survival; pts=patients.

Evaluation of response based on CT scans and determination of serum tumour marker concentrations. Including one patient with consolidation CNS radiation for CNS metastases. One patient with non-germ cell tumour elements. One patient after resection of mature teratoma at relapse. One patient with simultaneous relapse of GCT (after achievement of PRm−) and development of haematologic disorder (myelodysplasia with abnormal megakaryocyctes). CR=complete remission after chemotherapy alone; NEDvital tumour/teratoma/necrosis=no evidence of disease after complete resection of vital tumour or differentiated teratoma; PR=partial remission; PD=Progressive disease; DoD=dead of disease; CI=confidence interval; OS=overall survival; PFS=progression-free survival; pts=patients.

Univariate analysis on prognostic factors for survival

Results are summarised in Table 3. A significant inferior PFS was found for patients who had a disease extending beyond the mediastinum with evidence of liver or pulmonary metastases. Disease confined to the mediastinum indicated a superior outcome. The presence of liver metastases was identified to worsen OS. Elevation of tumour marker concentrations and categorisation into ‘good/intermediate’– vs ‘poor’ – marker according to the IGCCCG did not influence either PFS or OS.
Table 3

Univariate analysis of patients' and treatment characteristics for their influence on OS in nonseminomatous mediastinal GCT

CharacteristicsNo. of pts (%)Calculated 5-year OS rate (%)PCalculated 5-year PFS rate (%)P
Extent of disease
 Mediastinum only10 (32)90 90 
 Lung/pleural7 (25)57 29 
 Visceral disease11 (36)450.08450.02
Bone metastases
 No23 (82)64 59 
 Yes5 (18)600.87600.93
Lung metastases
 No11 (39)89 89 
 Yes17 (61)530.23410.03
CNS metastases
 No25 (89)58 54 
 Yes3 (11)1000.221000.18
Liver metastases
 No21 (75)80 75 
 Yes7 (25)14<0.0114<0.01
Lymph nodes1
 No25 (89)66 63 
 Yes3 (11)330.12330.38
Age
 20–256 (21)0 0 
 26–307 (25)86 86 
 31–357 (25)57 43 
 36–405 (18)80 80 
 >403 (11)1000.02670.27
Tumour marker status2
 AFP
  Good/intermediate18 (64)67 56 
  Poor7 (25)570.65570.87
β-HCG
  Good/intermediate20 (71)65 60 
  Poor5 (18)600.86400.37
 LDH
  Good/intermediate24 (86)67 58 
  Poor1 (4)00.1400.29

Additional regional lymph node involvement outside of the midline.

According to International germ cell consensus classification, 1997.

β-HCG=beta human chorionic gonadotropin; LDH=lactate dehydrogenase; LN=lymph nodes; OS=overall survival; PFS=progression-free survival; pts=patients.

Additional regional lymph node involvement outside of the midline. According to International germ cell consensus classification, 1997. β-HCG=beta human chorionic gonadotropin; LDH=lactate dehydrogenase; LN=lymph nodes; OS=overall survival; PFS=progression-free survival; pts=patients.

Comparison to standard-dose cisplatin-containing treatment programmes

Two hundred fifty three patients with mediastinal GCT, who had received cisplatin-based conventional chemotherapy between 1979 and 1996, were available from the database of the International Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumour Study Group comprising 635 patients with extragonadal GCT from 11 cancer centres in the US and Europe (Bokemeyer ; Hartmann ). The results of patients with nonseminomatous mediastinal GCT undergoing standard-dose regimen were compared with our experience in patients with dose-intensive chemotherapy according to the HD-VIP protocol (Table 4, Figures 2A,B). There was a higher 5-year OS rate with dose-intensive therapy compared to standard-dose cisplatin protocols of 64% vs 46% as well as 57% vs 42% for PFS rates at 5 years. The corresponding hazard ratios for PFS and OS in patients receiving HD-VIP compared to standard cisplatin chemotherapy were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.42 – 1.17) and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.38 – 1.01), respectively.
Table 4

Comparison of trials in patients with primary mediastinal nonseminomatous GST including conventional cisplatin-based regimen and high-dose chemotherapy

 Conventional dosea
HD-VIP
VariableNo. of pts%No. of pts%
Patients253 28 
CR/PRm- (assessable)157 (244)4517 (28)61
Status
NED114451761
AwD11414
Dead121481036
Lost to follow-up94
Median 5-year PFS rate (%)42 56 
Median 5-year OS rate (%)46 64 
Median PFS (months)15 Not reached 
Median OS (months)40 Not reached 

HD=high dose; CR=complete remission; PRm-=marker normalized partial remission; NED=no evidence of disease; AwD=alive with disease; PFS=progression-free survival; OS=overall survival; pts=patients.

Data about patients receiving standard cisplatin chemotherapy are derived from the database of the International Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumour Study Group (in part described in Bokemeyer et al, 2002, Hartmann et al, 2002).

Figure 2

Overall survival (A) and PFS (B) for patients with primary mediastinal nonseminoma treated on programmes that included either high-dose chemotherapy (HD-VIP) or conventional dose cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy (date about patients receiving standard cisplatin chemotherapy are derived from the database of the International Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumour Study Group (in part described in Bokemeyer ; Hartmann ). mos= months

HD=high dose; CR=complete remission; PRm-=marker normalized partial remission; NED=no evidence of disease; AwD=alive with disease; PFS=progression-free survival; OS=overall survival; pts=patients. Data about patients receiving standard cisplatin chemotherapy are derived from the database of the International Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumour Study Group (in part described in Bokemeyer et al, 2002, Hartmann et al, 2002). Overall survival (A) and PFS (B) for patients with primary mediastinal nonseminoma treated on programmes that included either high-dose chemotherapy (HD-VIP) or conventional dose cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy (date about patients receiving standard cisplatin chemotherapy are derived from the database of the International Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumour Study Group (in part described in Bokemeyer ; Hartmann ). mos= months

DISCUSSION

Although the principles of management of patients with mediastinal nonseminomatous GCT parallel those of metastatic nonseminomatous testicular GCT, patients with mediastinal primaries clearly have a worse prognosis compared to patients with gonadal GCT. Accordingly, the presence of a mediastinal primary tumour in patients with nonseminomatous GCT was identified as a major adverse prognostic factor by the IGCCCG. Such patients appear to represent a clinically and biologically distinct disease entity (Nichols ,1987,1990a; Hartmann ,2001a,2001b), associated with lower complete response rates to chemotherapy, high rates of relapse and more frequent failures to salvage chemotherapy (Saxman , Loehrer ; Hartmann ). Historically, the incorporation of cisplatin into chemotherapy regimens has yielded survival rates of approximately 30–40% in retrospective analyses (Garnick ; Logothetis ; Delgado ; Dulmet ; Toner ; International germ cell consensus classification, 1997). Two prospective series based on 31 and 41 patients reported a long-term survival rate of >50% following conventional cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus secondary surgery (Nichols , Bukowski ). The database of the International Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumour Study Group contains 287 patients with primary mediastinal tumour location and nonseminomatous histology from 11 Cancer Centres (Bokemeyer ; Hartmann ). Of these patients, 253 have been treated with conventional cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The 2- and 5-year OS rates of those patients were 55 and 46%, and 47 and 42% for PFS. The analysis of the International Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumour Study Group demonstrated that patients with primary mediastinal GCT have a heterogeneous prognosis depending on patients' characteristics (Hartmann ). Patients having localised mediastinal disease without elevation of HCG at initial diagnosis and who were of young age, revealed a favourable survival (OS 83% at 2 years) compared to patients presenting with adverse prognostic variables such as presence of visceral metastases or of lung metastases (OS 34 or 42% at 2 years). One conclusion from this investigation is that patients with localised disease confined to the mediastinum have an acceptable prognosis when treated by a multidisciplinary approach with aggressive surgery of the residual mediastinal tumour mass. However, more than half of the patients with mediastinal nonseminomatous GCT failed to achieve a durable response to conventional cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The success of carboplatin/etoposide- (CE) or carboplatin/etoposide/cyclophosphamide- (CEC) containing high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (HD-CT) in the treatment of patients with relapsed disease led to its investigation as initial first-line treatment in patients fulfilling ‘poor prognosis’ criteria. With this approach as initial treatment, the time to blood count recovery is shorter, toxicity is reduced, and further dose intensification is feasible compared with its use in heavily pretreated patients (Motzer ). Two consecutive trials conducted by investigators at the MSKCC suggested a therapeutic benefit for HD-CT when used as first-line treatment for ‘poor prognosis’ patients (Motzer ,1997). The long-term survival rates for all ‘poor prognosis’ patients have been 54 and 67% after HD-CT with the CE- or CEC-regimen. These trials included single patients with primary mediastinal nonseminomatous GCT; however, no detailed data on response and outcome for this subgroup of patients due to the small numbers were reported. The use of initial dose intensification in patients with nonseminomatous mediastinal GCT appears reasonable because the results with salvage treatment, even including HD-CT, have been rather disappointing. It appears that more than 90% of patients with relapsed mediastinal nonseminoma fail to obtain a durable, complete remission in the salvage setting (Josefsen ; Saxman ; Loehrer ; Hartmann ). The current series on the use of intensive first-line HD-VIP for patients with primary mediastinal nonseminoma indicates the feasibility of this approach, and a 15–20% absolute survival improvement for these patients receiving sequential HD-VIP as initial treatment compared to the use of conventional induction chemotherapy might be achievable. Calculation of the hazard ratios portended a 33% and 41%-risk reduction in recurrence and death probability for patients treated with HD-VIP compared to standard cisplatin chemotherapy. However, this is based on a small sample size in the high-dose chemotherapy group. The comparison of high-dose and standard-dose chemotherapy was not performed as a prospective randomised trial, and therefore patient selection and stage migration might be an issue since both groups of patients had been treated in a different time period. Prognostic factors for patients receiving HD-VIP in the univariate analysis have been similar to those in the International Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumour Study Group database – localised mediastinal disease vs visceral disease, for example, liver, bone, CNS metastases and lung/pleural involvement. The OS rates at 2 years achieved in this investigation compared to the expected rates according to the prognostic index of the International Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumour Study Group for mediastinal nonseminomas have been 100 vs 65% for patients with localised disease, 57 vs 42% for disease confined to the thorax (patients with lung or pleural metastases) and 45 vs 34% for patients with presence of visceral metastases (Hartmann ), suggesting that the results observed in this investigation of dose-intensified HD-VIP chemotherapy might not be achieved due to a selection of patients possessing more favourable prognostic characteristics. The only way to truly ascertain the difference between standard- and high-dose chemotherapy is to perform a randomised trial. An ongoing phase III trial has been initiated in the US to define the role of HD-CT including high-dose carboplatin instead of cisplatin in ‘intermediate’ and ‘poor prognosis’ patients. This trial also includes patients with primary mediastinal nonseminoma. However, because of the rarity of mediastinal location within the group of poor prognosis patients, this trial will only include approximately 12–18 patients with primary mediastinal GCT in each arm that will not allow a sufficient subgroup analysis. Overall, the survival rates in patients with mediastinal GCT have been improved over the years – particularly due to aggressive postchemotherapy surgery of residual mediastinal masses – now approaching the rate which is achieved in patients with ‘poor prognosis’ metastatic disease according to the IGCCCG classification (International Germ Cell Consensus Classification, 1997). More than half of the patients in the current series have undergone a multidisciplinary treatment approach including aggressive postchemotherapy surgery and the use of consolidation radiation of the brain in one patient. As in patients with metastatic gonadal GCT, radical surgical resection of residual masses after first-line chemotherapy is indicated, whenever technically possible either as a one-stage or as a sequential procedure (Kay ; Wright ; Nichols ; Hartmann ; Ganjoo ; Vuky ). In this series, all 10 patients with disease confined to the mediastinum regardless of other prognostic factors that are relevant for metastastic gonadal GCT, for example, tumour marker status, are disease-free. One of these patients died due to a haematologic disorder without evidence of GCT relapse. As described before, there is approximately a 6% risk to develop a haematologic disorder in patients with primary mediastinal nonseminoma, which represents a biological phenomenon not related to chemotherapy (Nichols ,1990a; Hartmann ). The haematologic malignancies have a very aggressive clinical course with patients either dying before treatment, not responding to antileukaemic therapy, or achieving remissions of very short duration. In the current investigation, two patients died due to haematologic disorders 12 and 18 months after completion of GCT treatment. Investigational approaches in progress explore whether the outcome of patients with mediastinal primary GCT can be further improved with the use of first-line sequential HD-CT or with the addition of further active drugs to the HD-VIP regimen (Hartmann ). In order to improve the prognosis of patients with mediastial GCT, it appears mandatory to include these patients into controlled clinical trials at experienced centres.
  40 in total

Review 1.  Testicular germ-cell cancer.

Authors:  G J Bosl; R J Motzer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Chemotherapy of extragonadal germ cell tumors.

Authors:  C J Logothetis; M L Samuels; D E Selig; F H Dexeus; D E Johnson; D A Swanson; A C von Eschenbach
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Hematologic disorders associated with primary mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumors.

Authors:  J T Hartmann; C R Nichols; J P Droz; A Horwich; A Gerl; S D Fossa; J Beyer; J Pont; K Fizazi; L Einhorn; L Kanz; C Bokemeyer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-01-05       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Extragonadal germ cell tumors of the mediastinum and retroperitoneum: results from an international analysis.

Authors:  Carsten Bokemeyer; Craig R Nichols; Jean-P Droz; Hans-J Schmoll; Alan Horwich; Arthur Gerl; Sophie D Fossa; Jörg Beyer; Jörg Pont; Lothar Kanz; Lawrence Einhorn; Jörg T Hartmann
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  The use of dose-intensified chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors. German Testicular Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  C Bokemeyer; A Harstrick; J Beyer; B Metzner; U Rüther; J T Hartmann; K Holstein; H G Derigs; R de Wit; J Casper; P Schöffski; I Kührer; H J Illiger; B Kempf; A Reichle; A Föller; D K Hossfeld; J T Fischer; W E Berdel; H H Gerhartz; H Kirchner; K H Pflüger; H Ostermann; L Kanz; H J Schmoll
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 6.  Hematologic neoplasia associated with primary mediastinal germ-cell tumors.

Authors:  C R Nichols; B J Roth; N Heerema; J Griep; G Tricot
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-05-17       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Mediastinal non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (MNSGCT) treated with cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy.

Authors:  M Hidalgo; L Paz-Ares; F Rivera; P Lianes; G Huidobro; A Ruiz; M López-Brea; J Sanz-Ortiz; J López López; H Cortés-Funes; J M Tabernero
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Phase II trial of high-dose carboplatin and etoposide with autologous bone marrow transplantation in first-line therapy for patients with poor-risk germ cell tumors.

Authors:  R J Motzer; M Mazumdar; S C Gulati; D F Bajorin; P Lyn; V Vlamis; G J Bosl
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-11-17       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Management of malignant teratoma: does referral to a specialist unit matter?

Authors:  M J Harding; J Paul; C R Gillis; S B Kaye
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-04-17       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Salvage treatment in male patients with germ cell tumours.

Authors:  D Josefsen; S Ous; J Høie; A E Stenwig; S D Fosså
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the treatment of testicular cancer.

Authors:  Hans-Georg Kopp; Markus Kuczyk; Johannes Classen; Arnulf Stenzl; Lothar Kanz; Frank Mayer; Michael Bamberg; Jörg Thomas Hartmann
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Successful treatment of disseminated extragonadal germ cell cancer with intensive conventional chemotherapy after first-line high-dose chemotherapy.

Authors:  Takeshi Yuasa; Tetsuya Yoshida; Yoshihiko Wakabayashi; Akira Kataoka; Mitsuhiro Narita; Tatsuhiro Yoshiki; Yusaku Okada
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Bone metastases in germ cell tumor patients.

Authors:  Karin Oechsle; Carsten Bokemeyer; Christian Kollmannsberger; Frank Mayer; Lars Arne Berger; Christoph Oing; Friedemann Honecker
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  Standard versus high-dose chemotherapy in mediastinal germ cell tumors: a narrative review.

Authors:  Emilio Francesco Giunta; Margaret Ottaviano; Alessandra Mosca; Giuseppe Luigi Banna; Pasquale Rescigno
Journal:  Mediastinum       Date:  2022-03-25

Review 5.  [What does the oncologist need from the pathologist in testicular cancer?]

Authors:  Christoph Oing; Mia-Carlotta Peters; Felix Bremmer
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.011

6.  Treatment strategies and prognostic factors of patients with primary germ cell tumors in the mediastinum.

Authors:  Ting Zhi Liu; Dong Sheng Zhang; Ying Liang; Ning Ning Zhou; Hong Fei Gao; Ke Jun Liu; Hai Ying Wu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Primary mediastinal germ cell tumors: Survival outcomes and prognostic factors - 10 years experience from a tertiary care institute.

Authors:  Narendra Kumar; Renu Madan; Chinna Babu Dracham; Vigneshwaran Chandran; Arun Elangovan; Divya Khosla; Budhi Singh Yadav; Rakesh Kapoor
Journal:  Rare Tumors       Date:  2020-11-18

8.  Unusual coexistence of a renal anomaly and germ cell tumor: An embryonal happenstance?

Authors:  Ankita Nachankar; Rahul Krishnatry; Anusheel Munshi; Kumar Prabhash; Poladia Bhavesh Pradip; C S Pramesh; Jai Prakash Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol       Date:  2012-07

9.  Intensive chemotherapy as salvage treatment for solid tumors: focus on germ cell cancer.

Authors:  F Selle; J Gligorov; S Richard; A Khalil; I Alexandre; D Avenin; S Provent; D G Soares; J P Lotz
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.590

10.  Prognostic factors in children with extracranial germ cell tumors treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jinsup Kim; Na Hee Lee; Soo Hyun Lee; Keon Hee Yoo; Ki Woong Sung; Hong Hoe Koo; Jeong-Meen Seo; Suk-Koo Lee
Journal:  Korean J Pediatr       Date:  2015-10-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.