Literature DB >> 12837810

Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine compared with cisplatin plus vinorelbine or cisplatin plus gemcitabine for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the Italian GEMVIN Investigators and the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

Cesare Gridelli1, Ciro Gallo, Frances A Shepherd, Alfonso Illiano, Francovito Piantedosi, Sergio Federico Robbiati, Luigi Manzione, Santi Barbera, Luciano Frontini, Enzo Veltri, Brian Findlay, Silvio Cigolari, Robert Myers, Giovanni P Ianniello, Vittorio Gebbia, Giampietro Gasparini, Sergio Fava, Vera Hirsh, Andrea Bezjak, Lesley Seymour, Francesco Perrone.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens are the standard treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although toxicity is common and may significantly affect the patient's quality of life (QoL). This trial aimed to assess whether a combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine had benefits in terms of QoL, without influencing negatively on survival, compared with cisplatin-containing regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB (effusion and supraclavicular nodes) or IV documented NSCLC who were younger than 70 years of age were randomly assigned gemcitabine plus vinorelbine (GemVin) or either gemcitabine plus cisplatin or vinorelbine plus cisplatin (cisplatin-based). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer scales were used for QoL analysis.
RESULTS: Five hundred one patients were randomly assigned to treatment. The median age was 62 years. There were no significant differences in global QoL scores between the two arms after 2 months of treatment. However, worsening scores for appetite, vomiting, and alopecia were significantly more common in the cisplatin-based arm. Median survival was 38 v 32 weeks and median progression-free survival was 23 v 17 weeks in the cisplatin-based versus GemVin arms, respectively. For the GemVin arm the hazard ratio for death was 1.15 (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.96 to 1.37) and the hazard ratio for progression was 1.29 (90% CI, 1.10 to 1.52). Grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression, vomiting, alopecia, and ototoxicity were significantly more frequent with cisplatin-based treatment.
CONCLUSION: Global QoL is not improved with GemVin, although advantages in some components of QoL were apparent. GemVin is less toxic than standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy. There is a nonsignificant slight survival advantage with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. GemVin could be offered to advanced NSCLC patients who express concern about toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12837810     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.06.099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  41 in total

Review 1.  Quality-of-life assessment in phase III clinical trials of gemcitabine in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan K Reynolds; Terri L Levien
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  50 Years of progress in the systemic therapy of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Heather Wakelee; Karen Kelly; Martin J Edelman
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2014

3.  Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine (GemVin) Regimen.

Authors:  Elizabeth Y Shang; Dominic A Solimando; J Aubrey Waddell
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2014-06

4.  Cisplatin plus continuous infusion vinorelbine for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase I-II study.

Authors:  M Cobo-Dols; S Gil-Calle; E Villar-Chamorro; I Alés-Díaz; F Carabantes-Ocón; J Alcalde-García; V Gutiérrez-Calderón; A Montesa-Pino; J J Bretón-García; M Benavides-Orgaz
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Quality-of-life outcomes for adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomized trial, JBR.10.

Authors:  Andrea Bezjak; Christopher W Lee; Keyue Ding; Michael Brundage; Timothy Winton; Barbara Graham; Marlo Whitehead; David H Johnson; Robert B Livingston; Lesley Seymour; Frances A Shepherd
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Effect of chemotherapy on quality of life in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Eileen Mannion; J J Gilmartin; Paul Donnellan; Maccon Keane; Dympna Waldron
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Non-platinum doublets were as effective as platinum-based doublets for chemotherapy-naïve advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in the era of third-generation agents.

Authors:  Jingwei Jiang; Xiaohua Liang; Xinli Zhou; Ruofan Huang; Zhaohui Chu; Qiong Zhan
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-08-05       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Gemcitabine and vinorelbine followed by weekly docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II trial of sequential chemotherapy.

Authors:  Manuel Cobo Dols; Esther Villar Chamorro; Inmaculada Alés Díaz; Silvia Gil Calle; Julia Alcalde García; Vanesa Gutiérrez Calderón; Francisco Carabantes Ocón; Alvaro Montesa Pino; Juan J Bretón García; Manuel Benavides Orgaz
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Gemcitabine for the treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Luca Toschi; Federico Cappuzzo
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  A randomized phase III study of the docetaxel/carboplatin combination versus docetaxel single-agent as second line treatment for patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Athanasios G Pallis; Sophia Agelaki; Athina Agelidou; Ioannis Varthalitis; Kostas Syrigos; Nikolaos Kentepozidis; Georgia Pavlakou; Athanasios Kotsakis; Emmanouel Kontopodis; Vassilis Georgoulias
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.