PURPOSE: The aim was to compare the efficacy between doublets of third-generation agents (non-platinum) and doublets of platinum plus a third-generation agent (platinum-based) for chemotherapy-naïve advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: We conducted a literature-based meta-analysis to compare the efficacy between doublets of third-generation agents and doublets of platinum plus a third-generation agent for chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC. The primary end point was overall survival, and the secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate. Subgroup analyses were also conducted by different non-platinum doublet regimens or different platinum-based doublets. A descriptive review for toxicity was performed. RESULTS: Sixteen randomized controlled trials were identified ultimately. Results demonstrated that the efficacy of non-platinum doublets was comparable with platinum-based doublets according to the overall survival (HR = 1.03, 95 % CI = 0.98-1.08, p = 0.29). Subgroup analyses by different non-platinum doublets also showed the efficacy of all the third-generation doublets, such as vinorelbine plus gemcitabine, vinorelbine plus paclitaxel, gemcitabine plus paclitaxel, and gemcitabine plus docetaxel, was comparable with platinum-based doublets (HR = 1.00, 95 % CI = 0.78-1.27, p = 0.98; HR = 0.97, 95 % CI = 0.80-1.18, p = 0.79; HR = 1.05, 95 % CI = 0.99-1.12, p = 0.11; HR = 1.01, 95 % CI = 0.92-1.10, p = 0.87; respectively). Subgroup analyses by different platinum-based doublets indicated that the efficacy of the third-generation doublets were equal to both cisplatin-based doublets and carboplatin-based doublets (HR = 1.08, 95 % CI = 1.00-1.17, p = 0.05; HR = 1.00, 95 % CI = 0.94-1.05, p = 0.94; respectively). The secondary end points indicated that platinum-based doublets might have an advantage in PFS but not in response rate (HR = 1.06, 95 % CI = 1.01-1.12, p = 0.03; RR = 0.99, 95 % CI = 0.90-1.08, p = 0.81; respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Non-platinum doublets were as effective as platinum-based doublets with different toxicity profile for chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC in the era of third-generation agents.
PURPOSE: The aim was to compare the efficacy between doublets of third-generation agents (non-platinum) and doublets of platinum plus a third-generation agent (platinum-based) for chemotherapy-naïve advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: We conducted a literature-based meta-analysis to compare the efficacy between doublets of third-generation agents and doublets of platinum plus a third-generation agent for chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC. The primary end point was overall survival, and the secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate. Subgroup analyses were also conducted by different non-platinum doublet regimens or different platinum-based doublets. A descriptive review for toxicity was performed. RESULTS: Sixteen randomized controlled trials were identified ultimately. Results demonstrated that the efficacy of non-platinum doublets was comparable with platinum-based doublets according to the overall survival (HR = 1.03, 95 % CI = 0.98-1.08, p = 0.29). Subgroup analyses by different non-platinum doublets also showed the efficacy of all the third-generation doublets, such as vinorelbine plus gemcitabine, vinorelbine plus paclitaxel, gemcitabine plus paclitaxel, and gemcitabine plus docetaxel, was comparable with platinum-based doublets (HR = 1.00, 95 % CI = 0.78-1.27, p = 0.98; HR = 0.97, 95 % CI = 0.80-1.18, p = 0.79; HR = 1.05, 95 % CI = 0.99-1.12, p = 0.11; HR = 1.01, 95 % CI = 0.92-1.10, p = 0.87; respectively). Subgroup analyses by different platinum-based doublets indicated that the efficacy of the third-generation doublets were equal to both cisplatin-based doublets and carboplatin-based doublets (HR = 1.08, 95 % CI = 1.00-1.17, p = 0.05; HR = 1.00, 95 % CI = 0.94-1.05, p = 0.94; respectively). The secondary end points indicated that platinum-based doublets might have an advantage in PFS but not in response rate (HR = 1.06, 95 % CI = 1.01-1.12, p = 0.03; RR = 0.99, 95 % CI = 0.90-1.08, p = 0.81; respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Non-platinum doublets were as effective as platinum-based doublets with different toxicity profile for chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC in the era of third-generation agents.
Authors: V Georgoulias; E Papadakis; A Alexopoulos; X Tsiafaki; A Rapti; M Veslemes; P Palamidas; I Vlachonikolis Journal: Lancet Date: 2001-05-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: E H Tan; A Szczesna; M Krzakowski; H N Macha; U Gatzemeier; K Mattson; M Wernli; P Reiterer; R Hui; J Von Pawel; O Bertetto; J C Pouget; J P Burillon; Y Parlier; R Abratt Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Andrea Ardizzoni; Luca Boni; Marcello Tiseo; Frank V Fossella; Joan H Schiller; Marianne Paesmans; Davorin Radosavljevic; Adriano Paccagnella; Petr Zatloukal; Paola Mazzanti; Donald Bisset; Rafael Rosell Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2007-06-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Egbert F Smit; Jan P A M van Meerbeeck; Pilar Lianes; Channa Debruyne; Catherine Legrand; Franz Schramel; Hans Smit; Rabab Gaafar; Bonne Biesma; Chris Manegold; Niels Neymark; Giuseppe Giaccone Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-11-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Christoph Pöttgen; Jehad Abu Jawad; Eleni Gkika; Lutz Freitag; Wolfgang Lübcke; Stefan Welter; Thomas Gauler; Martin Schuler; Wilfried Ernst Erich Eberhardt; Georgios Stamatis; Martin Stuschke Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: M C Pietanza; Matthew D Hellmann; John J Fiore; Stephanie Smith-Marrone; Ethan M Basch; Lawrence H Schwartz; Michelle S Ginsberg; Marwan Shouery; Samantha K Newman; Mary Shaw; Lauren J Rogak; Alex E Lash; Patrick Hilden; Mark G Kris Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 15.609