Literature DB >> 12836145

Predictors of student satisfaction in distance-delivered graduate nursing courses: what matters most?

Gregory A Debourgh1.   

Abstract

This article describes a study designed to investigate graduate nursing students' satisfaction with a course taught via interactive video teleconferencing (IVT) and the World Wide Web/Internet (WWW/INT). A correlational research design examined the relationships among 5 learner attributes and 3 instructional variables and student satisfaction. Regression analyses identified learner attributes and instructional variables predictive of student satisfaction. Forty-three graduate nurse students were surveyed using a 59-item Student Satisfaction Survey (SSS). Learner attribute predictors included: (1) previous technology courses, (2) technology competence, (3) between-class technology usage, (4) age, and (5) remote-site group size. Instructional predictors were clustered into 3 dimensions: instructor/instruction, technology, and course management. Student satisfaction was a composite of overall satisfaction with the course and comparison with conventional classroom courses. Instructor/instruction explained 21 percent of the variance in course satisfaction scores. Overall instructor rating strongly correlated with satisfaction. The most potent finding was that good pedagogy is important to students' perceived satisfaction with distance education. Students acclimate to the instructional reality-traditional, campus-based face-to-face instruction, or technology-mediated distance education-and once accustomed, it is the quality and effectiveness of instructor and instruction, not the technology, that is associated with satisfaction. The findings of this study provide essential information to faculty responsible for the design and delivery of effective instruction and to students pursuing flexible and convenient options for advanced education.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12836145     DOI: 10.1016/s8755-7223(03)00072-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prof Nurs        ISSN: 8755-7223            Impact factor:   2.104


  8 in total

1.  Promoting occupational health nursing training: an educational outreach with a blended model of distance and traditional learning approaches.

Authors:  Julie A Ward; Randal D Beaton; Annie M Bruck; A B de Castro
Journal:  AAOHN J       Date:  2011-09

2.  Developing a blended course on dying, loss, and grief.

Authors:  Karen Kavanaugh; V Ann Andreoni; Diana J Wilkie; Sandra Burgener; Mary Beth Tank Buschmann; Gloria Henderson; Yi-Fang Yvonne Hsiung; Zhongsheng Zhao
Journal:  Nurse Educ       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.082

3.  An e-learning reproductive health module to support improved student learning and interaction: a prospective interventional study at a medical school in Egypt.

Authors:  Rehab Abdelhai; Sahar Yassin; Mohamad F Ahmad; Uno G H Fors
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Subjective outcome evaluation and factors related to perceived effectiveness of the project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Daniel T L Shek; Lu Yu; Vicky Y T Ho
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-01

5.  Factors Influencing Learning Satisfaction of Migrant Workers in Korea with E-learning-Based Occupational Safety and Health Education.

Authors:  Young Joo Lee; Dongjoo Lee
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2015-06-05

6.  Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID 19.

Authors:  Ram Gopal; Varsha Singh; Arun Aggarwal
Journal:  Educ Inf Technol (Dordr)       Date:  2021-04-21

7.  The Influence of Teacher-Student Interaction on the Effects of Online Learning: Based on a Serial Mediating Model.

Authors:  Hai-Long Sun; Ting Sun; Feng-Yi Sha; Xiao-Yu Gu; Xin-Ru Hou; Fei-Yan Zhu; Pei-Tao Fang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-16

8.  Satisfaction with web-based training in an integrated healthcare delivery network: do age, education, computer skills and attitudes matter?

Authors:  Ashish Atreja; Neil B Mehta; Anil K Jain; Cm Harris; Hemant Ishwaran; Michel Avital; Andrew J Fishleder
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.