Literature DB >> 12834093

Do video sounds interfere with auditory event-related potentials?

G M McArthur1, D V M Bishop, M Proudfoot.   

Abstract

To make the electroencephalogram (EEG) recording procedure more tolerable, listeners have been allowed in some experiments to watch an audible video while their auditory P1, N1, P2, and mismatch negativity (MMN) event-related potentials (ERPs) to experimental sounds have been measured. However, video sounds may degrade auditory ERPs to experimental sounds. This concern was tested with 19 adults who were instructed to ignore standard and deviant tones presented through headphones while they watched a video with the soundtrack audible in one condition and silent in the other. Video sound impaired the size, latency, and split-half reliability of the MMN, and it decreased the size of the P2. However, it had little effect on the P1 or N1 or on the split-half reliability of the P1-N1-P2 waveform, which was significantly more reliable than the MMN waveform regardless of whether the video sound was on or off. The impressive reliability of the P1 and N1 components allows for the use of video sound during EEG recording, and they may prove useful for assessing auditory processing in listeners who cannot tolerate long testing sessions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12834093     DOI: 10.3758/bf03202561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput        ISSN: 0743-3808


  9 in total

1.  Effects of visual attentional load on low-level auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dyson; Claude Alain; Yu He
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Measurement of cognitive dynamics during video watching through event-related potentials (ERPs) and oscillations (EROs).

Authors:  Emel Erdogdu; Elif Kurt; Adil Deniz Duru; Atilla Uslu; Canan Başar-Eroğlu; Tamer Demiralp
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Individual differences in auditory processing in specific language impairment: a follow-up study using event-related potentials and behavioural thresholds.

Authors:  Dorothy V M Bishop; Genevieve M McArthur
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Measurement of mismatch negativity in individuals: a study using single-trial analysis.

Authors:  D V M Bishop; M J Hardiman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Effects of background noise on cortical encoding of speech in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Nicole Russo; Steven Zecker; Barbara Trommer; Julia Chen; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2009-04-08

6.  Case study: auditory brain responses in a minimally verbal child with autism and cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Shu H Yau; Genevieve McArthur; Nicholas A Badcock; Jon Brock
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Are the literacy difficulties that characterize developmental dyslexia associated with a failure to integrate letters and speech sounds?

Authors:  Hannah M Nash; Debbie Gooch; Charles Hulme; Yatin Mahajan; Genevieve McArthur; Kurt Steinmetzger; Margaret J Snowling
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2016-08-06

8.  Deficits in Letter-Speech Sound Associations but Intact Visual Conflict Processing in Dyslexia: Results from a Novel ERP-Paradigm.

Authors:  Sarolta Bakos; Karin Landerl; Jürgen Bartling; Gerd Schulte-Körne; Kristina Moll
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Validation of the Emotiv EPOC(®) EEG gaming system for measuring research quality auditory ERPs.

Authors:  Nicholas A Badcock; Petroula Mousikou; Yatin Mahajan; Peter de Lissa; Johnson Thie; Genevieve McArthur
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.