Literature DB >> 12833454

Evidence of a preferred molecular pathway in patients with synchronous colorectal cancer.

Sharon L Dykes1, Hongming Qui, David A Rothenberger, Julio García-Aguilar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A small proportion of patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) have synchronous tumors at the time of diagnosis. A subset of sporadic CRCs display microsatellite instability (MSI) that is associated with MLH1 silencing due to promoter methylation. In the current study, the authors investigated the proportion of tumors with MSI in patients with synchronous colorectal carcinoma (SCRC) and the concordance in MSI status among tumors in a given individual. In addition, the authors examined MLH1 and MSH2 expression and MLH1 promoter methylation in SCRCs.
METHODS: The current study included 77 patients, with a combined total of 170 invasive SCRCs, who were identified from a database of 2884 patients with CRC. Instability was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification using a set of five markers. Tumors that were unstable at two or more markers were considered unstable (MSI); otherwise, they were considered microsatellite stable (MSS). Expression of MLH1 and MSH2 was determined by immunohistochemistry. Methylation of the MLH1 gene promoter was determined by a methylation-specific PCR assay. Statistical comparisons were made using the chi-square test or the Student t test.
RESULTS: Of the 77 patients in the study, 21 (27%) had a family history of hereditary nonpolyposis colon carcinoma-related malignancy, but none fulfilled the Amsterdam II criteria. Fifty-four of 170 tumors (32%) were found to be MSI. Patients with MSI tumors were older and more frequently female. All but 1 MSI tumor lacked expression of MLH1 (n = 44) or MSH2 (n = 8), or both (n = 1). All MLH1-negative tumors, compared with only 3 MLH1-positive tumors, were methylated at the MLH1 promoter. Most patients (n = 67; 87%) had either all MSS tumors (n = 48; 62%) or all MSI tumors (n = 19; 25%); 10 patients (13%) had both MSS and MSI tumors. The observed MSI/MSS distribution was significantly different from the distribution expected based on an assumption of independence (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong concordance in MSI/MSS status among tumors in the same individual. This finding suggests that the tumors in patients with SCRC develop along a preferred molecular pathway. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.11445

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12833454     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  14 in total

1.  Redefining synchronous colorectal cancers based on tumor clonality.

Authors:  José Perea; Juan L García; Luis Corchete; Eva Lumbreras; María Arriba; Daniel Rueda; Sandra Tapial; Jessica Pérez; Victoria Vieiro; Yolanda Rodríguez; Lorena Brandáriz; Mariano García-Arranz; Damián García-Olmo; Ajay Goel; Miguel Urioste; Rogelio González Sarmiento
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 2.  Multiple primary colorectal cancer: Individual or familial predisposition?

Authors:  José A Pajares; José Perea
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12-15

3.  A Prospective Study of Smoking and Risk of Synchronous Colorectal Cancers.

Authors:  David A Drew; Reiko Nishihara; Paul Lochhead; Aya Kuchiba; Zhi Rong Qian; Kosuke Mima; Katsuhiko Nosho; Kana Wu; Molin Wang; Edward Giovannucci; Charles S Fuchs; Andrew T Chan; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  The mechanism of microsatellite instability is different in synchronous and metachronous colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Fernando S Velayos; Suk-Hwan Lee; Hongming Qiu; Sharon Dykes; Raymond Yiu; Jonathan P Terdiman; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  A prospective cohort study shows unique epigenetic, genetic, and prognostic features of synchronous colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Katsuhiko Nosho; Shoko Kure; Natsumi Irahara; Kaori Shima; Yoshifumi Baba; Donna Spiegelman; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Edward L Giovannucci; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  Synchronous colorectal cancer: clinical, pathological and molecular implications.

Authors:  Alfred King-Yin Lam; Sally Sze-Yan Chan; Melissa Leung
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Risk of multiple colorectal cancer development depends on age and subgroup in individuals with hereditary predisposition.

Authors:  Lars J Lindberg; Wia Wegen-Haitsma; Steen Ladelund; Lars Smith-Hansen; Christina Therkildsen; Inge Bernstein; Mef Nilbert
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 8.  MLH1 promoter methylation frequency in colorectal cancer patients and related clinicopathological and molecular features.

Authors:  Xia Li; Xiaoping Yao; Yibaina Wang; Fulan Hu; Fan Wang; Liying Jiang; Yupeng Liu; Da Wang; Guizhi Sun; Yashuang Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Multiple sporadic colorectal cancers display a unique methylation phenotype.

Authors:  Victoria Gonzalo; Juan Jose Lozano; Virginia Alonso-Espinaco; Leticia Moreira; Jenifer Muñoz; Maria Pellisé; Sergi Castellví-Bel; Xavier Bessa; Montserrat Andreu; Rosa M Xicola; Xavier Llor; Clara Ruiz-Ponte; Angel Carracedo; Rodrigo Jover; Antoni Castells; Francesc Balaguer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Molecular heterogeneity and prognostic implications of synchronous advanced colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  A Malesci; G Basso; P Bianchi; L Fini; F Grizzi; G Celesti; G Di Caro; G Delconte; F Dattola; A Repici; M Roncalli; M Montorsi; L Laghi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.