Literature DB >> 12831920

A case-controlled study of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the detection of pelvic recurrence in previously irradiated rectal cancer patients.

Harvey G Moore1, Tim Akhurst, Steven M Larson, Bruce D Minsky, Madhu Mazumdar, Jose G Guillem.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although effective at detecting locally recurrent colorectal cancer, the accuracy of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for detecting rectal cancer recurrence in an irradiated pelvis has not been systematically studied. STUDY
DESIGN: Records of surgically resected rectal cancer patients who underwent FDG-PET imaging at least 6 months after external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) were reviewed. Cases (n = 19) were defined as scans from patients in whom a pelvic recurrence was confirmed (histologically, n = 14, radiologic followup, n = 5). Controls (n = 41), defined as scans from patients without clinical or radiologic evidence of pelvic recurrence, were compared with cases for the time interval between completion of EBRT and FDG-PET imaging (RT/PET interval, mean 25.1 months versus 27.5 months, respectively), as well as EBRT dose (mean 5,084 cGy versus 5,062 cGy, respectively). All 60 FDG-PET scans were iteratively reconstructed and reinterpreted by a single nuclear medicine physician blinded to original FDG-PET interpretation and disease status. Certainty of disease was scored on a five-point scale (1 to 5), with scores greater than or equal to 4 considered positive.
RESULTS: FDG-PET correctly identified 16 of 19 recurrences, for a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 88%. Overall accuracy was 87%. Positive predictive value was 76% and negative predictive value was 92%. Positive predictive value and accuracy improved in scans performed more than 12 months after EBRT.
CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data suggest that FDG-PET is an accurate modality for detecting pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer after full-dose EBRT. Its reliability appears to improve with time, perhaps because of resolution of early postradiation inflammation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12831920     DOI: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00337-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  17 in total

1.  [Locally recurrent rectal carcinoma].

Authors:  Th Lehnert; M Golling; J Buchholz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  The essence of the Japan Radiological Society/Japanese College of Radiology Imaging Guideline.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Yamashita; Sadayuki Murayama; Masahiro Okada; Yoshiyuki Watanabe; Masako Kataoka; Yasushi Kaji; Keiko Imamura; Yasuo Takehara; Hiromitsu Hayashi; Kazuko Ohno; Kazuo Awai; Toshinori Hirai; Kazuyuki Kojima; Shuji Sakai; Naofumi Matsunaga; Takamichi Murakami; Kengo Yoshimitsu; Toshifumi Gabata; Kenji Matsuzaki; Eriko Tohno; Yasuhiro Kawahara; Takeo Nakayama; Shuichi Monzawa; Satoru Takahashi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Re: Salvaging a linear staple line defect in ultra-low anterior resection.

Authors:  Y-H Ho
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  [Rectal cancer - local staging and imaging under neoadjuvant therapy].

Authors:  M Karpitschka
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  FDG-PET/MRI in patients with pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer: first clinical experiences.

Authors:  Verena Plodeck; Nuh N Rahbari; Juergen Weitz; Christoph G Radosa; Michael Laniado; Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann; Klaus Zöphel; Bettina Beuthien-Baumann; Joerg Kotzerke; Joerg van den Hoff; Ivan Platzek
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Surveillance after curative treatment for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Eric P van der Stok; Manon C W Spaander; Dirk J Grünhagen; Cornelis Verhoef; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 7.  [Therapy of locally recurrent rectal carcinoma].

Authors:  H G Hempen; H R Raab
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Value of CT, FDG PET-CT and serum tumor markers in staging recurrent colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Meltem Caglar; Can Yener; Erdem Karabulut
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Role of multidetector CT and FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis of local and distant recurrence of resected rectal cancer.

Authors:  M Bellomi; S Rizzo; L L Travaini; L Bazzi; G Trifirò; M G Zampino; D Radice; G Paganelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 10.  18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in oncology.

Authors:  Ahmad Almuhaideb; Nikolaos Papathanasiou; Jamshed Bomanji
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.