Literature DB >> 12830056

Radial artery patency and clinical outcomes: five-year interim results of a randomized trial.

Brian F Buxton1, Jai S Raman, Permyos Ruengsakulrach, Ian Gordon, Alex Rosalion, Rinaldo Bellomo, Mark Horrigan, David L Hare.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare elective angiographic patency and cardiac event-free survival of the radial artery graft with that of the free right internal thoracic artery or saphenous vein during a 10-year period after primary coronary artery bypass surgery.
METHODS: This prospective, randomized, single-center trial was conducted on two groups of patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass surgery. In a younger group (group 1, n = 285, <70 years), the radial artery was compared with the free right internal thoracic artery. In an older group (group 2, n = 153, >/=70 years), the radial artery was compared with the saphenous vein. The trial conduit was grafted to the largest available coronary artery other than the left anterior descending coronary artery. Angiography was scheduled at intervals between 0 and 10 years according to a second random assignment. Patients were followed up at yearly intervals to assess clinical outcomes. Clinical outcomes were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis during the 10-year follow-up with time-related analyses. This interim study reports angiographic and clinical outcome results during the first 5 years.
RESULTS: Graft patency estimates were as follows: 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.85-0.99) in 39 radial arteries versus 1.0 in 29 right internal thoracic arteries (P =.4) in group 1, and 0.86 (95% confidence interval 0.67-0.99) in 24 radial arteries versus 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.83-0.99) in 22 saphenous veins (P =.5) in group 2. Cardiac event-free survival estimates were as follows: 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0.76-0.99) for the radial artery versus 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.63-0.99) for the right internal thoracic artery (P =.7) in group 1, and 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.64-0.99) for the radial artery versus 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.72-0.99) for the saphenous vein (P =.9) in group 2.
CONCLUSION: The 5-year interim results do not support the hypothesis that the radial artery has superior patency to or is associated with fewer clinical events than free right internal thoracic artery or saphenous vein grafts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12830056     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(02)73241-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  24 in total

1.  [ECG-gated bypass CT angiography--application in imaging arterial bypasses].

Authors:  B J Wintersperger; G Bastarrika; K Nikolaou; C Rist; A Huber; A Knez; M F Reiser; C R Becker; C Vicol
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Will drug-eluting stents replace coronary artery bypass surgery?

Authors:  Ross M Reul
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2005

Review 3.  Stents or surgery: the case for stents.

Authors:  James M Wilson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2005

4.  The history of arterial revascularization: from Kolesov to Tector and beyond.

Authors:  Brian F Buxton; Sean D Galvin
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07

Review 5.  Radial artery graft vs. saphenous vein graft for coronary artery bypass surgery : which conduit offers better efficacy?

Authors:  H Zhang; Z W Wang; H B Wu; X P Hu; Z Zhou; P Xu
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  Systematic comparison of the effectiveness of radial artery and saphenous vein or right internal thoracic artery coronary bypass grafts in non-left anterior descending coronary arteries.

Authors:  Xiang Hu; Qiang Zhao
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.066

7.  Association of Radial Artery Graft vs Saphenous Vein Graft With Long-term Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mario Gaudino; Umberto Benedetto; Stephen Fremes; Karla Ballman; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Art Sedrakyan; Giuseppe Nasso; Jai Raman; Brian Buxton; Philip A Hayward; Neil Moat; Peter Collins; Carolyn Webb; Miodrag Peric; Ivana Petrovic; Kyung J Yoo; Irbaz Hameed; Antonino Di Franco; Marco Moscarelli; Giuseppe Speziale; John D Puskas; Leonard N Girardi; David L Hare; David P Taggart
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Radial artery grafts for lower limb revascularisation.

Authors:  M Griffin; A Karthikesalingam; J Brownrigg; R J Hinchliffe
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Optical coherence tomography imaging as a quality assurance tool for evaluating endoscopic harvest of the radial artery.

Authors:  Nicholas S Burris; Emile N Brown; Michael Grant; Zachary N Kon; Marc Gibber; Junyen Gu; Kimberly Schwartz; Seeta Kallam; Ashish Joshi; Richard Vitali; Robert S Poston
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Mid-term results of the Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes randomized trial.

Authors:  Philip A Hayward; Brian F Buxton
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.