Literature DB >> 12827260

[The value of ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer].

F Frauscher1, A Klauser, A P Berger, E J Halpern, G Feuchtner, F Koppelstaetter, L Pallwein, G M Pinggera, H Weirich, W Horninger, G Bartsch, D zur Nedden.   

Abstract

The value of ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer has increased in importance in the past decade, which is mainly related due to the increasing incidence of prostate cancer, the most common malignancy in men. The value of conventional gray-scale US for prostate cancer detection has been extensively investigated. The introduction of US contrast agents has dramatically changed the role of US for prostate cancer detection. Advances in US techniques were introduced to further increase the role of US contrast agents. Although most of these advances in US techniques, which use the interaction of the contrast agent with the transmitted US waves are very sensitive for the detection of microbubbles, are mostly unexplored, in particular for prostate applications. First reports of contrast-enhanced US investigations of blood flow of the prostate have shown that contrast-enhanced US adds important information to the conventional US technique. We present a critical evaluation of the current status of transrectal US imaging for prostate cancer detection. Furthermore, we give background information on US contrast agents and imaging modalities. Early results of contrast-enhanced US suggest the feasibility of the use of US contrast agents to enhance US imaging of the prostate. The application of US contrast agents for the detection and clinical staging of prostate cancer is promising. However, future clinical trials will be needed to determine the promise of contrast-enhanced US of the prostate evolves into clinical application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12827260     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-003-0914-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  8 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of perfusion using ultrasound.

Authors:  David Cosgrove; Nathalie Lassau
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  A comparison of the diagnostic performance of systematic versus ultrasound-guided biopsies of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Hilco van Moerkerk; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; J Alfred Witjes; Ferdinand Frauscher; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  [Vascular imaging with contrast-enhanced sonography for experimental use].

Authors:  M Krix; H-U Kauczor; S Delorme
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  [Rising PSA level and negative prostate biopsy. Can prostate elastography help?].

Authors:  T Eggert; M Brock; J Noldus; H Ermert
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Transrectal real-time elastography-guided transperineal prostate biopsy as an improved tool for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Ren Wang; Jin-Jin Chen; Bing Hu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

Review 6.  [Ultrasound contrast agents and prostate cancer].

Authors:  F Frauscher; L Pallwein; A Klauser; A P Berger; F Koppelstaetter; J Gradl; M Schurich; J Bektic; G M Pinggera; E J Halpern; W Horninger; G Bartsch; D zur Nedden
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 7.  [Ultrasound contrast agents. Pharmaceutical drug safety and bioeffects].

Authors:  M Krix; J W Jenne
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 8.  [Prostate carcinoma].

Authors:  H-P Schlemmer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.635

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.