Literature DB >> 12827123

Validation of the Ottawa Knee Rule in children: a multicenter study.

Blake Bulloch1, Gina Neto, Amy Plint, Rodrick Lim, Per Lidman, Martin Reed, Cheri Nijssen-Jordan, Milton Tenenbein, Terry P Klassen, Ravi Bhargava.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the Ottawa Knee Rules when they were applied to children. The secondary objective was to determine post hoc whether use of the rules would reduce the number of knee radiographs ordered.
METHODS: This prospective, multicenter validation study included children aged 2 to 16 years who presented to the emergency department with a knee injury sustained in the preceding 7 days. Children were assessed for the variables comprising the Ottawa Knee Rules, and physicians ordered radiographs at their discretion. A positive outcome was defined as any fracture. A negative outcome was defined as children who did not have a fracture on radiograph or, if no radiograph was obtained, were asymptomatic after 14 days.
RESULTS: A total of 750 children were enrolled. The mean age was 11.8+/-3.1 years, and 443 (58.7%) were male patients. Seventy children had fractures. Radiography was performed for 670 children, whereas 80 children had only a structured telephone interview. The Ottawa Knee Rules were 100% sensitive (95% confidence interval [CI] 94.9% to 100%), with a specificity of 42.8% (95% CI 39.1% to 46.5%). Only 460 children would have required a radiograph if radiographs had been performed according to the Ottawa Knee Rules, which would have resulted in an absolute reduction of 209 (31.2%) radiographs.
CONCLUSION: The Ottawa Knee Rules are valid in children and have the potential to decrease the use of radiography in children with knee injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12827123     DOI: 10.1067/mem.2003.196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  9 in total

Review 1.  Imaging strategies in paediatric musculoskeletal trauma.

Authors:  Marianne Alison; Robin Azoulay; Bogdana Tilea; Amina Sekkal; Ana Presedo; Guy Sebag
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-06

2.  CATCH: a clinical decision rule for the use of computed tomography in children with minor head injury.

Authors:  Martin H Osmond; Terry P Klassen; George A Wells; Rhonda Correll; Anna Jarvis; Gary Joubert; Benoit Bailey; Laurel Chauvin-Kimoff; Martin Pusic; Don McConnell; Cheri Nijssen-Jordan; Norm Silver; Brett Taylor; Ian G Stiell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Imaging utilization commentary: a radiology perspective.

Authors:  Martin H Reed
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-09-23

4.  Use of radiographic imaging protocols by canadian memorial chiropractic college interns.

Authors:  Amy Butt; Jordanna Clarfield-Henry; Loan Bui; Kim Butler; Cynthia Peterson
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2007

5.  Sideline coverage: when to get radiographs? A review of clinical decision tools.

Authors:  Sara J Gould; Dennis A Cardone; John Munyak; Philipp J Underwood; Stephen A Gould
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.843

6.  Validation of the Ottawa knee rule in adults: A single centre study.

Authors:  Jordan I Sims; Minh Chau; Josephine Davies
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2020-06-21

7.  Adolescent knee pain: fracture or normal? A case report.

Authors:  Melissa Corso; Scott Howitt
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2018-08

8.  The Ottawa knee rule: examining use in an academic emergency department.

Authors:  Bryan G Beutel; Samir K Trehan; Robert M Shalvoy; Michael J Mello
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-09

Review 9.  Developing a framework for evidence-based grading and assessment of predictive tools for clinical decision support.

Authors:  Mohamed Khalifa; Farah Magrabi; Blanca Gallego
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.796

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.