Literature DB >> 12825040

Evaluation of middle meatal stenting after minimally invasive sinus techniques (MIST).

Peter J Catalano1, Eric J Roffman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we compared postoperative synechia rates and morbidity for different middle meatal (MM) stents after minimally invasive sinus techniques (MIST). STUDY
DESIGN: In a prospective study, we included 100 patients with bilateral chronic sinusitis undergoing MIST at a tertiary care facility with a single surgeon.
METHODS: For all patients, MeroGel stents were placed in the right MM, Gelfilm stents were placed in the left MM. Follow-up consisted of 3 postoperative visits between weeks 1 and 12 with endoscopic evaluation for synechia, granulation tissue, stent retention, nasal obstruction, headache, and infection.
RESULTS: Synechia developed in 4 patients on the left and in none on the right (P = 0.04). There were no significant side-specific differences regarding postoperative nasal congestion, headache, or sinusitis. Mean stent retention time was 7.9 days for MeroGel and 5.6 days for Gelfilm (P = 0.0004).
CONCLUSION: Compared with Gelfilm, Merogel MM stents produced less synechia; Merogel retains its position in the MM longer than Gelfilm; and the incidence of postoperative MM synechia can be reduced when absorbable MM stents are used in conjunction with MIST.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12825040     DOI: 10.1016/S0194-59980300469-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   5.591


  8 in total

Review 1.  ENT assessment in the integrated management of candidate for (maxillary) sinus lift.

Authors:  L Pignataro; M Mantovani; S Torretta; G Felisati; G Sambataro
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.124

2.  Comparative analysis of Cutanplast and Spongostan nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.

Authors:  Kyu-Sup Cho; Chan-Hwi Park; Sung-Lyong Hong; Min-Jung Kim; Joo-Yeon Kim; Yong-Wan Kim; Soo-Kweon Koo; Hwan-Jung Roh
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Clinical benefits of polyurethane nasal packing in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Zalan Piski; Imre Gerlinger; Nelli Nepp; Peter Revesz; Andras Burian; Kornelia Farkas; Laszlo Lujber
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Potential risk factors associated with the development of synechiae following functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Jamil Manji; Al-Rahim R Habib; Ameen A Amanian; Saad Alsaleh; Andrew Thamboo; Amin R Javer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Long-term effects of postoperative measures after sinus surgery.

Authors:  Vegard Bugten; Ståle Nordgård; Sverre Steinsvåg
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Endoscopic outcomes of resorbable nasal packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Marco Berlucchi; Paolo Castelnuovo; Andrea Vincenzi; Bruno Morra; Ernesto Pasquini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  How effective is postoperative packing in FESS patients? A critical analysis of published interventional studies.

Authors:  Petros V Vlastarakos; Emily Iacovou; Melina Fetta; Marios Tapis; Thomas P Nikolopoulos
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Nasal packing and stenting.

Authors:  Rainer K Weber
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.