Literature DB >> 12823792

Birth certificate methods in five hospitals.

Sally Northam1, Shea Polancich, Elizabeth Restrepo.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the methods of data collection of birth certificate information by five high-delivery hospitals in northern Texas. Research purposes were to identify sources and methods of birth certificate data collection and identify the most-reliable methods. This descriptive study involved interviews of each hospital's data collectors and review of 1999 Texas birth certificate data. Medical record clerks, whose training varied, but usually consisted of orientation by another medical record clerk, collected birth certificate data within 24 hours of birth. There was no standard method for training, nor was there a minimum level of education required. In four of the five hospitals studied, a birth certificate clerk collected most of the information with limited input from other medical sources. The information obtained on birth certificates therefore varied according to the collector and the priority placed upon the accuracy of information. Birth certificate data contain questionable reliability, which undermines data use in research, funding, and policy decisions.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12823792     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1446.2003.20409.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nurs        ISSN: 0737-1209            Impact factor:   1.462


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of gestational age estimate method on the calculation of preterm birth rates.

Authors:  Eric S Hall; Alonzo T Folger; Elizabeth A Kelly; Beena Devi Kamath-Rayne
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-04

2.  Unexpected complications of low-risk pregnancies in the United States.

Authors:  Valery A Danilack; Anthony P Nunes; Maureen G Phipps
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Reliability of gestational weight gain reported postpartum: a comparison to the birth certificate.

Authors:  Stefanie N Hinkle; Andrea J Sharma; Laura A Schieve; Usha Ramakrishnan; Deanne W Swan; Aryeh D Stein
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-05

4.  Validity of infant race/ethnicity from birth certificates in the context of U.S. demographic change.

Authors:  Lisa Reyes Mason; Yunju Nam; Youngmi Kim
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Reliability and validity of birth certificate prepregnancy weight and height among women enrolled in prenatal WIC program: Florida, 2005.

Authors:  Sohyun Park; William M Sappenfield; Connie Bish; Diana M Bensyl; David Goodman; Jane Menges
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-10

6.  Reviewing performance of birth certificate and hospital discharge data to identify births complicated by maternal diabetes.

Authors:  Heather M Devlin; Jay Desai; Anne Walaszek
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-09-03

7.  Reliability of variables on the North Carolina birth certificate: a comparison with directly queried values from a cohort study.

Authors:  Lisa C Vinikoor; Lynne C Messer; Barbara A Laraia; Jay S Kaufman
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.980

8.  Inclusion of non-viable neonates in the birth record and its impact on infant mortality rates in Shelby County, Tennessee, USA.

Authors:  Bryan L Williams; Melina S Magsumbol
Journal:  Pediatr Rep       Date:  2010-06-18

9.  Preterm birth among the Hmong, other Asian subgroups and non-Hispanic whites in California.

Authors:  Zoua M Vang; Irma T Elo; Makoto Nagano
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Examining interpregnancy intervals and maternal and perinatal health outcomes using U.S. vital records: Important considerations for analysis and interpretation.

Authors:  Marie E Thoma; Dane A De Silva; Marian F MacDorman
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.980

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.