Literature DB >> 12823649

Narrowing gender differences in procedure use for acute myocardial infarction: insights from the Worcester heart attack study.

Leslie R Harrold1, Julian Esteban, Darleen Lessard, Jorge Yarzebski, Jerry H Gurwitz, Joel M Gore, Robert J Goldberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine age-specific gender differences and trends over time in the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of patients admitted with AMI from a community-wide perspective over a 10-year period (1990-1999).
SETTING: All hospitals in the Worcester (Mass) metropolitan area (1990 census = 437000). PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: We identified 2037 women and 2645 men who were hospitalized in the Worcester metropolitan area with confirmed AMI during six 1-year periods between 1990 and 1999. Four age groups (<55, 55 to 64, 65 to 74 and >or=75 years) of men and women were studied.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Use of echocardiography, exercise treadmill testing (ETT), cardiac catheterization, percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) during the index hospitalization was examined in relation to age and gender. Overall, women were less likely to undergo ETT, cardiac catheterization, and CABG than were men, and these trends remained after controlling for potentially confounding factors. Between 1990 and 1999, there was a dramatic decrease in ETT, whereas the use of echocardiography remained unchanged. There were marked increases over time in the use of cardiac catheterization and PCI in women and men. Use of cardiac catheterization and PCI increased to a greater extent in women as compared to men. In patients who underwent cardiac catheterization, rates of coronary revascularization were similar between men and women.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that women and men with AMI are treated differently with respect to use of diagnostic and revascularization procedures. However, gender differences in the use of these diagnostic and interventional approaches have narrowed over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12823649      PMCID: PMC1494881          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20929.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  25 in total

Review 1.  Exercise tolerance testing.

Authors:  Jonathan Hill; Adam Timmis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-04

2.  Trends in survival of hospitalized myocardial infarction patients between 1970 and 1985. The Minnesota Heart Survey.

Authors:  P G McGovern; A R Folsom; J M Sprafka; G L Burke; K M Doliszny; J Demirovic; J D Naylor; H Blackburn
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease.

Authors:  J Z Ayanian; A M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Incidence and case fatality rates of acute myocardial infarction (1975-1984): the Worcester Heart Attack Study.

Authors:  R J Goldberg; J M Gore; J S Alpert; J E Dalen
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Sex-related differences in patients undergoing direct angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J L Vacek; T L Rosamond; P H Kramer; L J Crouse; C B Porter; O W Robuck; J L White; G D Beauchamp
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Sex differences in the management and long-term outcome of acute myocardial infarction. A statewide study. MIDAS Study Group. Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System.

Authors:  J B Kostis; A C Wilson; K O'Dowd; P Gregory; S Chelton; N M Cosgrove; A Chirala; T Cui
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Recent changes in attack and survival rates of acute myocardial infarction (1975 through 1981). The Worcester Heart Attack Study.

Authors:  R J Goldberg; J M Gore; J S Alpert; J E Dalen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986 May 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  A community-wide perspective of gender differences and temporal trends in the use of diagnostic and revascularization procedures for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  D E Chiriboga; J Yarzebski; R J Goldberg; Z Chen; J Gurwitz; J M Gore; J S Alpert; J E Dalen
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Absence of sex bias in the referral of patients for cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  D B Mark; L K Shaw; E R DeLong; R M Califf; D B Pryor
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-04-21       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  A communitywide perspective of sex differences and temporal trends in the incidence and survival rates after acute myocardial infarction and out-of-hospital deaths caused by coronary heart disease.

Authors:  R J Goldberg; E J Gorak; J Yarzebski; D W Hosmer; P Dalen; J M Gore; J S Alpert; J E Dalen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  9 in total

1.  Women's health education: progress and promises.

Authors:  Deborah S Kwolek
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  The role of gender and other factors as predictors of not receiving reperfusion therapy and of outcome in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Marc Cohen; Gian Franco Gensini; Frans Maritz; Enrique P Gurfinkel; Kurt Huber; Ari Timerman; Jose Santopinto; Giancarlo Corsini; Pierfranco Terrosu; Florence Joulain
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Age difference explains gender difference in cardiac intervention rates after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Randall R Fransoo; Patricia J Martens; Heather J Prior; Elaine Burland; Dan Château; Alan Katz
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-08

4.  Sex differences in coronary catheterization and revascularization following acute myocardial infarction: time trends from 1994 to 2003 in British Columbia.

Authors:  Tara L Sedlak; Aihua Pu; Eve Aymong; Min Gao; Nadia Khan; Hude Quan; Karin H Humphries
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 5.  A comprehensive view of sex-specific issues related to cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Louise Pilote; Kaberi Dasgupta; Veena Guru; Karin H Humphries; Jennifer McGrath; Colleen Norris; Doreen Rabi; Johanne Tremblay; Arsham Alamian; Tracie Barnett; Jafna Cox; William Amin Ghali; Sherry Grace; Pavel Hamet; Teresa Ho; Susan Kirkland; Marie Lambert; Danielle Libersan; Jennifer O'Loughlin; Gilles Paradis; Milan Petrovich; Vicky Tagalakis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Current trends in coronary revascularization.

Authors:  Shannon M Dunlay; Charanjit S Rihal; Thoralf M Sundt; Yariv Gerber; Véronique L Roger
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2009-02

Review 7.  Acute coronary syndromes in women: is treatment different? Should it be?

Authors:  Susan K Bennett; Rita F Redberg
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Age and Sex Differences and Temporal Trends in the Use of Invasive and Noninvasive Procedures in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Vu Hoang Tran; Jordy Mehawej; Donna M Abboud; Mayra Tisminetzky; Essa Hariri; Andreas Filippaios; Joel M Gore; Jorge Yarzebski; Jordan H Goldberg; Darleen Lessard; Robert Goldberg
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 6.106

9.  Three-year follow-up and event rates in the international REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health Registry.

Authors:  Mark J Alberts; Deepak L Bhatt; Jean-Louis Mas; E Magnus Ohman; Alan T Hirsch; Joachim Röther; Geneviève Salette; Shinya Goto; Sidney C Smith; Chiau-Suong Liau; Peter W F Wilson; Ph Gabriel Steg
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 29.983

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.