OBJECTIVE: To understand differences in length of stay for asthma patients between New York State and Pennsylvania across children's and general hospitals in order to better guide policy. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: All pediatric admissions for asthma in the states of Pennsylvania and New York using claims data obtained from each state for the years 1996-1998, n = 38,310. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort design to model length of stay (LOS), the probability of prolonged stay, conditional length of stay (CLOS or the LOS after stay is prolonged), and the probability of readmission, controlling for patient factors, state, location and hospital type. ANALYTIC METHODS: Logit models were used to estimate the probability of prolonged stay and readmission. The LOS and the CLOS were estimated with Cox regression. Model variables included comorbidities, income, race, distance from hospital, and insurance type. Prolonged stay was based on a Hollander-Proschan "New-Worse-Than-Used" test, corresponding to a three-day stay. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The LOS was longer in New York than Pennsylvania, and the probabilities of prolonged stay and readmission were much higher in New York than Pennsylvania. However, once an admission was prolonged, there were no differences in CLOS between states (when readmissions were not added to the LOS calculation). In both states, children's hospitals and general hospitals had similar adjusted LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Management of asthma appears more efficient in Pennsylvania than New York: Less severe patients are discharged faster in Pennsylvania than New York; once discharged, patients are less likely to be readmitted in Pennsylvania than New York. However, once a stay is prolonged, there is little difference between New York and Pennsylvania, suggesting medical care for severely ill patients is similar across states. Differences between children's and general hospitals were small as compared to differences between states. We conclude that policy initiatives in New York, and other states, should focus their efforts on improving the care provided to less severe patients in order to help reduce overall length of stay.
OBJECTIVE: To understand differences in length of stay for asthmapatients between New York State and Pennsylvania across children's and general hospitals in order to better guide policy. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: All pediatric admissions for asthma in the states of Pennsylvania and New York using claims data obtained from each state for the years 1996-1998, n = 38,310. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort design to model length of stay (LOS), the probability of prolonged stay, conditional length of stay (CLOS or the LOS after stay is prolonged), and the probability of readmission, controlling for patient factors, state, location and hospital type. ANALYTIC METHODS: Logit models were used to estimate the probability of prolonged stay and readmission. The LOS and the CLOS were estimated with Cox regression. Model variables included comorbidities, income, race, distance from hospital, and insurance type. Prolonged stay was based on a Hollander-Proschan "New-Worse-Than-Used" test, corresponding to a three-day stay. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The LOS was longer in New York than Pennsylvania, and the probabilities of prolonged stay and readmission were much higher in New York than Pennsylvania. However, once an admission was prolonged, there were no differences in CLOS between states (when readmissions were not added to the LOS calculation). In both states, children's hospitals and general hospitals had similar adjusted LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Management of asthma appears more efficient in Pennsylvania than New York: Less severe patients are discharged faster in Pennsylvania than New York; once discharged, patients are less likely to be readmitted in Pennsylvania than New York. However, once a stay is prolonged, there is little difference between New York and Pennsylvania, suggesting medical care for severely ill patients is similar across states. Differences between children's and general hospitals were small as compared to differences between states. We conclude that policy initiatives in New York, and other states, should focus their efforts on improving the care provided to less severe patients in order to help reduce overall length of stay.
Authors: D M Mannino; D M Homa; C A Pertowski; A Ashizawa; L L Nixon; C A Johnson; L B Ball; E Jack; D S Kang Journal: MMWR CDC Surveill Summ Date: 1998-04-24
Authors: C J Homer; P Szilagyi; L Rodewald; S R Bloom; P Greenspan; S Yazdgerdi; J M Leventhal; D Finkelstein; J M Perrin Journal: Pediatrics Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Anne Marie Rafferty; Sean P Clarke; James Coles; Jane Ball; Philip James; Martin McKee; Linda H Aiken Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2006-10-24 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Morgan M Sellers; Luke J Keele; Catherine E Sharoky; Christopher Wirtalla; Elizabeth A Bailey; Rachel R Kelz Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Jeffrey H Silber; Lisa M Bellini; Judy A Shea; Sanjay V Desai; David F Dinges; Mathias Basner; Orit Even-Shoshan; Alexander S Hill; Lauren L Hochman; Joel T Katz; Richard N Ross; David M Shade; Dylan S Small; Alice L Sternberg; James Tonascia; Kevin G Volpp; David A Asch Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jeffrey H Silber; Paul R Rosenbaum; Amy K Rosen; Patrick S Romano; Kamal M F Itani; Liyi Cen; Lanyu Mi; Michael J Halenar; Orit Even-Shoshan; Kevin G Volpp Journal: Med Care Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Amol S Navathe; Jeffrey H Silber; Dylan S Small; Amy K Rosen; Patrick S Romano; Orit Even-Shoshan; Yanli Wang; Jingsan Zhu; Michael J Halenar; Kevin G Volpp Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2012-08-02 Impact factor: 3.402