Literature DB >> 12822130

Olfactory function in workers exposed to styrene in the reinforced-plastics industry.

Pamela Dalton1, Beverly Cowart, Daniel Dilks, Michele Gould, Peter S J Lees, Aleksandr Stefaniak, Edward Emmett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Impairment of olfactory function in humans has been associated with occupational exposure to volatile chemicals. To investigate whether exposure to styrene was associated with olfactory impairment, olfactory function was examined in workers with a minimum of 4 years exposure to styrene in the reinforced-plastics industry (current mean exposure: 26 ppm, range: 10-60 ppm; historic mean dose: 156 ppm-years, range: 13.8-328 ppm-years) and in a group of age- and gender-matched, unexposed controls.
METHODS: Olfactory function was assessed using a standardized battery that included tests of threshold sensitivity for phenylethyl alcohol (PEA), odor identification ability, and retronasal odor perception. Odor detection thresholds for styrene were also obtained as a measure of specific adaptation to the work environment.
RESULTS: No differences were observed between exposed workers and controls on tests of olfactory function. Elevation of styrene odor detection thresholds among exposed workers indicated exposure-induced adaptation.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study found no evidence among a cross-section of reinforced-plastics industry workers that current or historical exposure to styrene was associated with impairment of olfactory function. Taken together with anatomical differences between rodent and human airways and the lack of evidence for styrene metabolism in human nasal tissue, the results strongly suggest that at these concentrations, styrene is not an olfactory toxicant in humans. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12822130     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.10102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  8 in total

1.  Editorial: Evaluation of chemosensory effects due to occupational exposures.

Authors:  Christoph van Thriel; Gerhard Triebig; Hermann M Bolt
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 2.  Olfactory dysfunction and its measurement in the clinic and workplace.

Authors:  Richard L Doty
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 3.  Olfactory toxicity: long-term effects of occupational exposures.

Authors:  Fabriziomaria Gobba
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Odor identification ability and self-reported upper respiratory symptoms in workers at the post-9/11 World Trade Center site.

Authors:  Kenneth W Altman; Shaun C Desai; Jacqueline Moline; Rafael E de la Hoz; Robin Herbert; Patrick J Gannon; Richard L Doty
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Toxin-induced chemosensory dysfunction: a case series and review.

Authors:  Wendy M Smith; Terence M Davidson; Claire Murphy
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.467

6.  Chemosensory loss: functional consequences of the world trade center disaster.

Authors:  Pamela H Dalton; Richard E Opiekun; Michele Gould; Ryan McDermott; Tamika Wilson; Christopher Maute; Mehmet H Ozdener; Kai Zhao; Edward Emmett; Peter S J Lees; Robin Herbert; Jacqueline Moline
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Retronasal Olfaction Test Methods: A Systematic Review

Authors:  Hüseyin Özay; Aslı Çakır; Mustafa Cenk Ecevit
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.021

Review 8.  Olfactory dysfunction revisited: a reappraisal of work-related olfactory dysfunction caused by chemicals.

Authors:  Sabine Werner; Eberhard Nies
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.646

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.