Antianginal and anti-ischemic efficacy of nicorandil in comparison with isosorbide-5-mononitrate and isosorbide dinitrate: results from two multicenter, double-blind, randomized studies with stable coronary heart disease patients.

The purpose of the two double-blind studies summarized in this article was to compare the antianginal and anti-ischemic effects of nicorandil with those of two different nitrate preparations. A total of 129 patients with stable New York Heart Association functional class II or III coronary heart disease were enrolled in the studies. Ninety-five patients received nicorandil, 34 received isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN), and 63 received isosorbide-5-mononitrate (MN). In study 1, nicorandil was compared with MN in a crossover design with 54 protocols eligible for efficacy assessment of MN and 52 eligible for nicorandil, respectively. Twenty milligrams of nicorandil and 20 mg MN administered b.i.d. for 4 weeks were equally effective in the treatment of stress-induced angina. Both drugs prolonged bicycle exercise tolerance and reduced weekly anginal attack rates. In study 2, nicorandil and ISDN were administered to two parallel groups of patients at a dose of 10 mg t.i.d. for 2 weeks and then 20 mg t.i.d. for 4 weeks. Under the assumption that the repetitive administration of nitrates with short dosing intervals might induce the development of tolerance to the nitrate mechanism of action, the t.i.d.-dosing regimen had been chosen in this study. Thirty-two protocols from those receiving nicorandil and 34 protocols from those receiving ISDN were eligible for efficacy assessment. Both drugs increased exercise capacity and reduced ST-segment depression at identical work loads with no significant difference between groups (p > 0.05). For both drugs, the higher doses were more effective than the lower doses. tolerance to the nitrate mechanism of action did not develop with either drug.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes