Literature DB >> 12821414

Phonology and syntax in specific language impairment: evidence from a connectionist model.

Marc F Joanisse1, Mark S Seidenberg.   

Abstract

Difficulties in resolving pronominal anaphora have been taken as evidence that Specific Language Impairment (SLI) involves a grammar-specific impairment. The present study explores an alternative view, that grammatical deficits in SLI are sequelae of impaired speech perception. This perceptual deficit specifically affects the use of phonological information in working memory, which in turn leads to poorer than expected syntactic comprehension. This hypothesis was explored using a connectionist model of sentence processing that learned to map sequences of words to their meanings. Anaphoric resolution was represented in this model by recognizing the semantics of the correct antecedent when a bound pronoun was input. When the model was trained on distorted phonological inputs-simulating a perceptual deficit-it exhibited marked difficulty resolving bound anaphors. However, many other aspects of sentence comprehension were intact; most importantly, the model could still resolve pronouns using gender information. In addition, the model's deficit was graded rather than categorical, as it was able to resolve pronouns in some sentences, but not in others. These results are consistent with behavioral data concerning syntactic deficits in SLI. The model provides a causal demonstration of how a perceptual deficit could give rise to grammatical deficits in SLI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12821414     DOI: 10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00533-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  27 in total

1.  Individual differences in language ability are related to variation in word recognition, not speech perception: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Cheyenne Munson; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Contextual Influences on Phonetic Categorization in School-Aged Children.

Authors:  Jean A Campbell; Heather L McSherry; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  Front Commun (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-09-19

3.  Speaking up for vocabulary: reading skill differences in young adults.

Authors:  David Braze; Whitney Tabor; Donald P Shankweiler; W Einar Mencl
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2007 May-Jun

Review 4.  Uses and interpretations of non-word repetition tasks in children with and without specific language impairments (SLI).

Authors:  Jeffry A Coady; Julia L Evans
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 5.  The P-chain: relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition.

Authors:  Gary S Dell; Franklin Chang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Computational modeling of interventions for developmental disorders.

Authors:  Michael S C Thomas; Anna Fedor; Rachael Davis; Juan Yang; Hala Alireza; Tony Charman; Jackie Masterson; Wendy Best
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 7.  Increasing the odds: applying emergentist theory in language intervention.

Authors:  Gerard H Poll
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Individual Differences in Distributional Learning for Speech: What's Ideal for Ideal Observers?

Authors:  Rachel M Theodore; Nicholas R Monto; Stephen Graham
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Adults with Specific Language Impairment fail to consolidate speech sounds during sleep.

Authors:  F Sayako Earle; Nicole Landi; Emily B Myers
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Individual differences in online spoken word recognition: Implications for SLI.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Vicki M Samelson; Sung Hee Lee; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.