Literature DB >> 12821343

A phase II trial of arzoxifene, a selective estrogen response modulator, in patients with recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer.

D Scott McMeekin1, Alan Gordon, Jeffrey Fowler, Allen Melemed, Richard Buller, Thomas Burke, Jeffery Bloss, Paul Sabbatini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine response rate and evaluate toxicity of LY353381 (arzoxifene) in patients with recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer (EC).
METHODS: A phase II, open-labeled study with arzoxifene was performed at 13 centers. Patients with measurable recurrent/advanced EC not amenable to curative therapies were eligible if either the primary tumor or recurrent tumor was ER+ and/or PR+. If receptor status could not be determined, patients with well or moderately well-differentiated EC were also permitted. Prior use of salvage chemotherapy was not allowed; however, prior use of progestagens was permitted and patients were stratified by prior exposure to progestagen. Patients received 20 mg/day PO, and were treated for at least 8 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Efficacy was based on the frequency of complete (CR) and partial (PR) responses, and a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze time to progression and duration of response.
RESULTS: From February 1999 through April 2001, 37 patients were entered of whom 34 received treatment. Efficacy was evaluated for the 29 patients who received at least 4 weeks of therapy and at least one tumor response assessment. Safety was assessed in all 34 patients who received any drug. Thirty patients were defined as progestagen sensitive, and 4 patients were defined as progestagen failures. Twenty-six patients were ER+, and 22 were PR+. Nine (1 CR + 8 PR) of 29 patients responded (31%, CI 25-51%), with a median duration of response of 13.9 months. All 9 responses occurred in progestagen-sensitive patients. Two additional patients (one from each progestagen cohort) had stable disease for >or=6 months. The median progression-free interval was 3.7 months (CI 1.9-6.6 months) for all 29 patients. Toxicity was minimal with no grade 3-4 toxic effects, and 9 patients had only grade 1-2 toxic effects (7 grade 1, 2 grade 2). Hot flashes were the most common toxic effect and, in all 3 reported cases, were grade 1.
CONCLUSIONS: Arzoxifene has demonstrated a high response rate with the longest median duration of response reported in a phase II trial of this patient population. The ease of administration and extremely favorable toxicity profile make this an agent warranting further evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12821343     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00203-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  19 in total

Review 1.  Bioactivation of Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs).

Authors:  Tamara S Dowers; Zhi-Hui Qin; Gregory R J Thatcher; Judy L Bolton
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  Comparative methods for analysis of protein covalent modification by electrophilic quinoids formed from xenobiotics.

Authors:  Bolan Yu; Zhihui Qin; Gihani T Wijewickrama; Praneeth Edirisinghe; Judy L Bolton; Gregory R J Thatcher
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.774

Review 3.  Chemotherapy for Endometrial Cancer in Adjuvant and Advanced Disease Settings.

Authors:  Christine M Bestvina; Gini F Fleming
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-07-13

4.  Selective Human Estrogen Receptor Partial Agonists (ShERPAs) for Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Rui Xiong; Hitisha K Patel; Lauren M Gutgesell; Jiong Zhao; Loruhama Delgado-Rivera; Thao N D Pham; Huiping Zhao; Kathryn Carlson; Teresa Martin; John A Katzenellenbogen; Terry W Moore; Debra A Tonetti; Gregory R J Thatcher
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Construction of a database for the evaluation and the clinical management of patients with breast cancer treated with antiestrogens and/or aromatase inhibitors.

Authors:  Francesca Giusti; Silva Ottanelli; Laura Masi; Antonietta Amedei; Maria Luisa Brandi; Alberto Falchetti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2011-01

Review 6.  Emerging selective estrogen receptor modulators: special focus on effects on coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Tatjana Elène Vogelvang; Marius Jan van der Mooren; Velja Mijatovic; Peter Kenemans
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Potential of selective estrogen receptor modulators as treatments and preventives of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jing Peng; Surojeet Sengupta; V Craig Jordan
Journal:  Anticancer Agents Med Chem       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Designing the ideal selective estrogen receptor modulator--an achievable goal?

Authors:  Hugh S Taylor
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Endometrial cancer: what is new in adjuvant and molecularly targeted therapy?

Authors:  Flora Zagouri; George Bozas; Eftichia Kafantari; Marinos Tsiatas; Nikitas Nikitas; Meletios-A Dimopoulos; Christos A Papadimitriou
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-02-02

10.  From empirical to mechanism-based discovery of clinically useful Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs).

Authors:  Suzanne E Wardell; Erik R Nelson; Donald P McDonnell
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.